| Literature DB >> 34036460 |
Eleni Papakokkinou1,2, Marta Piasecka1,2, Hanne Krage Carlsen3, Dimitrios Chantzichristos1,2, Daniel S Olsson1,2, Per Dahlqvist4, Maria Petersson5,6, Katarina Berinder5,6, Sophie Bensing5,6, Charlotte Höybye5,6, Britt Edén Engström7, Pia Burman8, Cecilia Follin9, David Petranek9, Eva Marie Erfurth9, Jeanette Wahlberg10,11, Bertil Ekman10, Anna-Karin Åkerman11, Erik Schwarcz11, Gudmundur Johannsson1,2, Henrik Falhammar5,6, Oskar Ragnarsson12,13.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bilateral adrenalectomy (BA) still plays an important role in the management of Cushing's disease (CD). Nelson's syndrome (NS) is a severe complication of BA, but conflicting data on its prevalence and predicting factors have been reported. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of NS, and identify factors associated with its development. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature search in four databases. STUDY SELECTION: Observational studies reporting the prevalence of NS after BA in adult patients with CD. DATA EXTRACTION: Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by three independent investigators. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirty-six studies, with a total of 1316 CD patients treated with BA, were included for the primary outcome. Pooled prevalence of NS was 26% (95% CI 22-31%), with moderate to high heterogeneity (I2 67%, P < 0.01). The time from BA to NS varied from 2 months to 39 years. The prevalence of NS in the most recently published studies, where magnet resonance imaging was used, was 38% (95% CI 27-50%). The prevalence of treatment for NS was 21% (95% CI 18-26%). Relative risk for NS was not significantly affected by prior pituitary radiotherapy [0.9 (95% CI 0.5-1.6)] or pituitary surgery [0.6 (95% CI 0.4-1.0)].Entities:
Keywords: Bilateral adrenalectomy; Corticotroph adenoma; Cushing’s disease; Nelson’s syndrome
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34036460 PMCID: PMC8416875 DOI: 10.1007/s11102-021-01158-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pituitary ISSN: 1386-341X Impact factor: 4.107
Characteristics of the included studies
| Study | Country | Period | Study population n | Women n (%) | Patients with NS n (%) | Women with NS n (%) | Patients treated for NS n (%) | Follow-up–median/mean, [range] (yr) | Time from BA to NS –mean /median, [range] (yr) | Age at BA in patients with NS-median/Mean (yr) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moore et al. [ | USA | NA | 120 | 89 (74) | 9 (8) | 8 (89) | 8 (7) | 8.0 [2.0–20.0] | 8.0 [0.5–16.0] | NA |
| Scott et al. [ | USA | 1952–1976 | 26 | 19 (73) | 1 (4) | 1 (100) | 1 (4) | 8.0 [0.5–20.0] | 2.0 [NA] | 51.0 |
| Nabarro et al. [ | UK | 1954–1976 | 32 | NA | 6 (19) | 6 (100) | 6 (19) | NA | NA | 26.0 |
| Cohen et al. [ | USA | 1951–1976 | 21 | 19 (90) | 8 (38) | 8 (100) | 8 (38) | 8.0 [1.0–20.0] | 6.5 [1.5–12.0] | 29.5 |
| Jordan et al. [ | USA | 1952–1969 | 12 | 11 (92) | 4 (33) | NA | 4 (33) | NA | NA | NA |
| Barnett et al. [ | New Zealand | 1969–1980 | 15 | 13 (87) | 3 (20) | 1 (33) | NA | 5.0 [2.0–11.0] | NA | NA |
| Kasperlik et al. [ | Poland | 1958–1982 | 50 | 45 (90) | 14 (28) | 12 (86) | 10 (20) | 12.0 [1.0–22.0] | 4.8 [1.5–12.0] | 23.6 |
| Kelly et al. [ | UK | 1960–1980 | 38 | NA | 11 (29) | NA | 7 (18) | 10.0 [1.0–20.0] | 6.0 [3.0–13.0] | 45.0 |
| Kuhn et al. [ | France | NA | 72 | 49 (68) | 20 (28) | 14 (70) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Grabner et al. [ | Norway | 1950–1987 | 80 | NA | 10 (13) | NA | 10 (13) | 12.5 [1.0–34.0] | 9.5 [3.0–20.0] | NA |
| McCance et al. [ | Northern Ireland | 1972–1991 | 26 | 20 (77) | 7 (27) | NA | 7 (27) | 5.3 [0.6–19.1] | NA | NA |
| Zeiger et al. [ | USA | 1983–1993 | 10 | 9 (90) | 1 (10) | NA | NA | 3.3 [NA] | NA | NA |
| Favia et al. [ | Italy | 1975–1991 | 41 | NA | 6 (15) | NA | 4 (10) | NA, [2.0–16.0] | NA | NA |
| Kemink et al. [ | Netherlands | 1962–1991 | 48 | 44 (92) | 8 (17) | 8 (100) | NA | 9.5 [1.0–30.0] | 6.6 [1.5–13.0] | 26.0 |
| Misra et al. [ | India | NA | 16 | 10 (63) | 2 (13) | 1 (50) | 2 (13) | NA | NA | NA |
| Jenkins et al. [ | UK | 1946–1993 | 38 | NA | 11 (29) | NA | 10 (26) | NA | 1.0 [0.3–9.5] | NA |
| Pereira et al. [ | Brazil | NA | 30 | 22 (73) | 14 (47) | 12 (86) | 10 (33) | 6.0 [2.0–21.0] | 4.0 [0.9–10.0] | 31.0 |
| Imai et al. [ | Japan | 1957–1999 | 16 | NA | 4 (25) | NA | 4 (25) | NA | NA | NA |
| Nagesser et al. [ | Netherlands | 1953–1989 | 44 | 33 (75) | 10 (23) | 9 (90) | NA | 19.6 [1.0–41.6] | 15.5 [7.0–24.0] | 33.1 |
| Hofmann et al. [ | Germany | 1997–2004 | 11 | NA | 1 (9) | NA | 1 (9) | NA | NA | NA |
| Assié et al. [ | France | 1991–2002 | 53 | 45 (85) | 21 (40) | NA | 10 (19) | 4.6 [0.5–13.5] | 2 [0.5–7] | NA |
| Gil-Cardenas et al. [ | Mexico | 1990–2005 | 39 | 32 (82) | 11 (28) | 7 (64) | 11 (28) | 4.4 [1–15.7] | 1.3 [0.2–2.8] | NA |
| Thompson et al. [ | USA | 1994–2004 | 35 | NA | 3 (9) | NA | 3 (9) | 3.6 [0.3–10] | NA | NA |
| Smith et al. [ | USA | 1995–2007 | 40 | 34 (85) | 13 (33) | NA | 7 (18) | 5 [0.2–10.2] | NA | NA |
| Ding et al. [ | China | 2000–2008 | 34 | 29 (85) | 6 (18) | 6 (100) | 6 (18) | 4 [1.2–7.7] | NA | NA |
| Mehta et al. [ | USA | NA | 20 | 17 (85) | 1 (5) | NA | 1 (5) | 5.4 [0.6–12] | 0.8 [NA] | NA |
| Oßwald et al. [ | Germany | 1990–2013 | 29 | NA | 7 (24) | NA | 7 (24) | 11 [0.8–51] | 4.3 [NA] | NA |
| Prajapati et al. [ | India | 1991–2013 | 12 | NA | 5 (42) | NA | 5 (42) | 6.7 [0.3–13] | 2.7 [1.7–5] | NA |
| Espinosa-de-Los-Monteros et al. [ | Mexico | 1991–2014 | 10 | NA | 6 (60) | NA | 4 (40) | NA | 2.5 [2–8.5] | 23 |
| Graffeo et al. [ | USA | 1956–2015 | 88 | 64 (73) | 47 (53) | 34 (72) | 14 (16) | NA [2–58] | 3 [1–8] | 35 |
| Nankova et al. [ | Bulgaria | 1965–2016 | 36 | NA | 9 (25) | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Chiloiro et al. [ | Italy | 2003–2017 | 11 | 7 (64) | 1 (9) | NA | 1 (9) | 6 | NA | NA |
| Cohen et al. [ | Argentina | 1974–2011 | 13 | 9 (70) | 6 (46) | 4 (67) | 4 (31) | 14 [5–30] | 2 [0.7–3.9] | 31 |
| Nagendra et al. [ | India | 2005–2018 | 14 | NA | 6 (43) | NA | 4 (29) | NA | NA | NA |
| Ragnarsson et al. [ | Sweden | 1987–2013 | 96 | 71 (74) | 31 (32) | 24 (77) | 30 (31) | 22 [0–53] | 5.9 [0.5–39] | 32.9 |
| Sarkis et al. [ | France | 1990–2015 | 17 | 14 (82) | 5 (29) | NA | NA | NA | 6.1 [NA] | NA |
| Das et al. [ | India | 1984–2019 | 43 | 29 (67) | 17 (40) | 11 (64) | 16 (37) | 7 [1–12] | 3 [NA] | 31.1 |
NS nelson syndrome, BA bilateral adrenalectomy, yr years, NA not available/not applicable
aAdditional data
Data are given as no. (%) unless otherwise indicated
Fig. 1Flowchart of study selection
Fig. 2Forest plot showing individual studies and pooled prevalence of Nelson’s syndrome after bilateral adrenalectomy in patients with Cushing’s disease. *Additional data
Fig. 3Forest plot showing individual studies using magnetic resonance imaging and pooled prevalence of Nelson’s syndrome after bilateral adrenalectomy in patients with Cushing’s disease
Fig. 4Forest plot showing the RR (relative risk) and 95% CI for Nelson’s syndrome in patients treated with radiotherapy prior to bilateral adrenalectomy versus no radiotherapy. RR could not be calculated when there were no cases in the RTX or no RTX arms, and when no events in either arm. *Additional data. RTX, radiotherapy prior to bilateral adrenalectomy or prophylactic radiotherapy
Fig. 5Forest plot showing the RR (relative risk) and 95% CI for Nelson’s syndrome in patients treated with pituitary surgery prior to bilateral adrenalectomy versus no pituitary surgery. RR could not be calculated when there were no cases in the surgery or no surgery arms, and when no events in either arm. *additional data. Abbreviations: Surgery, pituitary surgery prior to bilateral adrenalectomy
Fig. 6Bubble plot showing the influence of age at BA on the prevalence of Nelson’s syndrome. The bubble sizes are proportional to the weight of the studies in the meta-analysis. Coefficient estimate (β) and p value for the effect of age at BA are indicated by the regression line