| Literature DB >> 34036076 |
Juan Huamani1, Romel Watanabe1, Jose Huamani2, Doris Salcedo-Moncada1, Daniel Alvitez-Temoche3, Frank Mayta-Tovalino4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the accuracy between functional swallowing (FS) and the Knebelman craniometric method (KCM) to measure occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) in total denture wearers.Entities:
Keywords: Accuracy; dentistry; occlusal vertical dimension; quasi-experimental study; total denture
Year: 2021 PMID: 34036076 PMCID: PMC8118056 DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_380_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Soc Prev Community Dent ISSN: 2231-0762
Figure 1Manufacture of upper and lower wax rims
Figure 2Physiological method of swallowing
Figure 3Knebelman craniometric method
Measurement of vertical dimension by functional swallowing and the Knebelman craniometric method on total denture wearers according to sex and age
| Variable | Mean±SD | |
|---|---|---|
| KCM | PMS | |
| Male | 68.1±3.9 | 68.4±3.7 |
| Female | 64.1±3.8 | 63.9±3.6 |
| Adult | 64.1±4.3 | 64.7±4.4 |
| Elderly | 66.2±4.2 | 66.0±4.2 |
All measurements are in mmm. KCM=Knebelman’s craniometric method, PMS=Physiological method of swallowing, SD=Standard deviation
Analysis of the concordance between the physiological method of swallowing and the craniometric method of Knebelman
| ICC | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | 0.97 | 0.31–0.99 | 0.013 |
CI=Confidence interval, 0.97
Graph 1Correlation between the physiological method of swallowing and the craniometric method of Knebelman
Linear regression analysis between the physiological method of swallowing and the craniometric method of Knebelman
| Variables | Coefficient | SE | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.02 | 0.11 | 0.823 | −0.20–0.25 |
| Life stage | 0.78 | 2.83 | 0.784 | −5.01–6.57 |
| KCM | ||||
| Sex | −3.81 | 1.48 | 0.016 | −6.86–−0.77 |
| Cons | 68.82 | 5.30 | 0.001 | 57.95–79.69 |
| Age | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.570 | −0.15–0.28 |
| PMS | ||||
| Life stage | −0.96 | 2.69 | 0.724 | −6.48–4.55 |
| Sex | −4.53 | 1.41 | 0.003 | −7.43–−1.63 |
| Cons | 70.53 | 5.05 | 0.001 | 60.18–80.88 |
KCM=Knebelman’s craniometric method, PMS=Physiological method of swallowing, CI=Confidence interval, SE=Standard error