| Literature DB >> 34035955 |
Yani Wang1,2, Dongfang Li2, Wenjie Su2, Yunhai Dai2,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and therapy of epithelial keratitis after cataract surgery.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34035955 PMCID: PMC8121559 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6636228
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ophthalmol ISSN: 2090-004X Impact factor: 1.909
Comparison of the preoperative tear film function between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups.
| Diabetic group ( | Nondiabetic group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 0.447† | ||
| <60 | 5 (13.51%) | 3 (5.77%) | |
| 60–70 | 11 (29.73%) | 16 (30.77%) | |
| >70 | 21 (56.76%) | 33 (63.46%) | |
| BUT, s | 0.517† | ||
| <10 | 34 (91.89%) | 45 (86.54%) | |
| ≥10 | 3 (8.11%) | 7 (13.46%) | |
| LTMH, mm | |||
| ≤0.2 | 8 (21.62%) | 4 (7.69%) | 0.068† |
| >0.2 | 29 (78.38%) | 48 (92.31%) | |
| Meibomian gland atrophy score | <0.001 | ||
| <2 | 7 (18.92%) | 32 (61.54%) | |
| ≥2 | 30 (81.08%) | 20 (38.46%) |
y = year; s = second; mm = millimeter. Chi-square test. †Chi-square test with continuity correction.
Comparison of predisposing factors related to EK between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups.
| Diabetic group ( | Nondiabetic group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| Age, y | 73.72 ± 5.71 | 66.83 ± 9.92 | 0.102§ |
| Preoperative BUT, s | 5.35 ± 1.93 | 7.05 ± 1.95 | <0.001§ |
| Preoperative meibomian gland atrophy score | 1.97 ± 0.78 | 1.42 ± 0.60 | <0.001§ |
| Preoperative LTMH, mm | 0.22 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.06 | <0.001§ |
| Phacoemulsification power, % | 9.64 ± 10.55 | 8.51 ± 8.10 | 0.921§ |
| Phacoemulsification time, s | 31.13 ± 14.76 | 30.4 ± 16.21 | 0.947§ |
| Duration of postoperative use of topical NSAIDs, d | 44.69 ± 10.51 | 33.35 ± 5.16 | <0.001§ |
s = second; mm = millimeter; y = year; d = day. §Mann–Whitney U test.
Diagnosis and staging of MGD between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups.
| Before surgery | After surgery |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diabetic group ( | Nondiabetic group ( | Diabetic group ( | Nondiabetic group ( | ||
| Absence of MGD | 6 (16.22%) | 30 (57.69%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Presence of MGD and staging |
| ||||
| 1 | 21 (56.76%) | 15 (28.85%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| 2 | 10 (27.03%) | 7 (13.46%) | 2 (5.41%) | 23 (44.23%) | |
| 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 8 (21.62%) | 5 (9.62%) | |
| 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (24.32%) | 11 (21.15%) | |
| ˝Plus˝ disease | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 18 (48.65%) | 13 (25.00%) |
|
Chi-square test. P1: comparison of patients with MGD before cataract surgery between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups. P2: comparison of patients at the “Plus” disease stage of MGD after surgery between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups.
Comparison of clinical characteristics of epithelial keratitis between the diabetic and nondiabetic groups.
| Clinical characteristics | Diabetic group ( | Nondiabetic group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Progress of epithelial damage | <0.001† | ||
| Dot superficial erosion | 4 (10.81%) | 31 (59.62%) | |
| Progress to diffuse superficial erosion | 15 (40.54%) | 8 (15.38%) | |
| Progress to epithelial defects | 18 (48.65%) | 13 (25.00%) | |
|
| |||
| Location of epithelial lesions at early stage | 0.600† | ||
| Nearby the main incision | 1 (2.70%) | 3 (5.77%) | |
| Central cornea | 24 (64.86%) | 24 (46.15%) | |
| Inferior cornea | 12 (32.43%) | 25 (48.08%) | |
|
| |||
| Time of occurrence for EK, w | 0.908† | ||
| <1 | 2 (5.41%) | 3 (5.77%) | |
| 1–2 | 7 (18.92%) | 8 (15.38%) | |
| >2 | 28 (75.68%) | 41 (78.85%) | |
| Time to corneal epitheliopathy progression, d | 0.025† | ||
| ≤2 | 3 (8.11%) | 6 (11.54%) | |
| 3–4 | 22 (59.46%) | 16 (30.77%) | |
| ≥5 | 12 (32.43%) | 30 (57.69%) | |
|
| |||
| Complications | |||
| Corneal ulcer | 1 (2.70%) | 0 (0%) | 0.233Ψ |
| Epithelial HSK | 2 (5.41%) | 0 (0%) | 0.090Ψ |
| Corneal nebulae after epithelial healing | 11 (29.73%) | 6 (11.54%) | 0.031 |
d = day; w = week; cm = centimeter. †Chi-square test with continuity correction. Chi-square test. ΨFisher's exact test.
Figure 1Fluorescence staining photographs of an eye with epithelial keratitis. Progression of an epithelial defect near the temporal clear corneal incision ((a) upon the initial visit; (b) after 4 days; (c) after 10 days). Healing of the corneal epithelial defect after topical antiviral treatment ((d) one month after the initial visit).
Figure 2Comparison of patients suffering epithelial keratitis combined with diabetes or not. Fluorescence staining of the corneal epithelial damage in a diabetic patient (a) and a nondiabetic patient (d). Confocal microscopic images from patient (a) showing the stromal edema and absence of subbasal nerve fibers in the area of corneal epithelial lesions (b) before the treatment for keratitis and obviously slender subbasal nerve fibers after the corneal epithelial healing (c). Confocal microscopic images from patient (d) showing the absence of subbasal nerve fibers in the area of corneal epithelial lesions (e) before the treatment for keratitis and sparse subbasal nerve fibers after the healing of the corneal epithelium (f). All confocal microscopic images are in the scale of 400 × 400 μm.