| Literature DB >> 34035878 |
Pamela N Modesto1, Bertha F Polegato1, Priscila P Dos Santos1, Leticia D V Grassi1, Leticia C C Molina1, Silmeia G Z Bazan1, Elenize J Pereira1, Ana Angelica H Fernandes2, Alexandre T Fabro3, Vickeline N Androcioli4, Meliza G Roscani5, Sergio A R de Paiva1, Leonardo A M Zornoff1, Marcos F Minicucci1, Paula S Azevedo1.
Abstract
Experimental studies have shown the action of green tea in modulating cardiac remodeling. However, the effects of green tea on the cardiac remodeling process induced by doxorubicin (DOX) are not known. Therefore, this study is aimed at evaluating whether green tea extract could attenuate DOX-induced cardiac remodeling, assessed by cardiac morphological and functional changes and associated with the evaluation of different modulators of cardiac remodeling. The animals were divided into four groups: the control group (C), the green tea group (GT), the DOX group (D), and the DOX and green tea group (DGT). Groups C and GT received intraperitoneal sterile saline injections, D and DGT received intraperitoneal injections of DOX, and GT and DGT were fed chow supplemented with green tea extract for 35 days prior to DOX injection. After forty-eight hours, we performed an echocardiogram and euthanasia and collected the materials for analysis. Green tea attenuated DOX-induced cardiotoxicity by increasing cardiac function and decreasing the concentric remodeling. Treatment with DOX increased oxidative stress in the heart, marked by a higher level of lipid hydroperoxide (LH) and lower levels of antioxidant enzymes. Treatment with green tea increased the antioxidant enzymes' activity and decreased the production of LH. Green tea extract increased the expression of Top2-β independent of DOX treatment. The activity of ATP synthase, citrate synthase, and complexes I and II decreased with DOX, without the effects of green tea. Both groups that received DOX presented with a lower ratio of P-akt/T-akt and a higher expression of CD45, TNFα, and intermediate MMP-2, without the effects of green tea. In conclusion, green tea attenuated cardiac remodeling induced by DOX and was associated with increasing the expression of Top2-β and lowering oxidative stress. However, energy metabolism and inflammation probably do not receive the benefits induced by green tea in this model.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34035878 PMCID: PMC8116148 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8898919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1Study development. On day one, we received the animals at approximately 100 g. Since then, they started to received their respective chow. When they reached a weight between 250 g and 300 g, we performed the first echocardiogram and intraperitoneal injection of DOX or saline solution according to which group the animals belonged to. On the thirty-fifth day, at forty-eight hours after administering the DOX or saline solution, we euthanized the animals and collected the blood and cardiac samples for analysis.
Concentrations of primary antibodies used for western blot.
| Antibody | Dilution ( | |
|---|---|---|
| TNF | Cell Signaling Technology; cs 11948S | 1/1000 |
| Collagen I | Santa Cruz, sc 293182 | 1/100 |
| Collagen III | Santa Cruz, sc 271249 | 1/100 |
| AMPK | Cell Signaling Technology; cs 2532S | 1/1000 |
| PPAR | Santa Cruz; sc-9000 (H-98) | 1/100 |
| Phosphorylated AKT | Cell Signaling Technology (Ser473); cs 4060S | 1/2000 |
| AKT | Cell Signaling Technology; cs 9272 | 1/1000 |
| Top2- | Abcam; ab109524 | 1/10000 |
| GAPDH | Santa Cruz; sc 32233 | 1/10000 |
Secondary antibody concentrations used for western blot.
| Analyzed protein | Antibody | Dilution ( |
|---|---|---|
| TNF | Mouse anti-rabbit sc-2357 | 1/5000 |
| Collagen I | Mouse anti-rabbit sc-2357 | 1/2000 |
| Collagen III | Mouse anti-mouse sc-2005 | 1/1000 |
| AMPK | Mouse anti-rabbit sc-2357 | 1/5000 |
| PPAR | Mouse anti-mouse sc-2005 | 1/10000 |
| Phosphorylated AKT | Mouse anti-rabbit sc-2357 | 1/5000 |
| AKT | Mouse anti-rabbit sc-2357 | 1/5000 |
| Top2- | Mouse anti-rabbit sc-2357 | 1/5000 |
| GAPDH | Mouse anti-mouse sc-2005 | 1/10000 |
Echocardiography forty-eight hours after doxorubicin injection.
| C ( | GT ( | D ( | DGT ( |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (bpm) | 367 ± 9, 50 | 335 ± 10, 5 | 290 ± 9, 82 | 305 ± 9, 82 | 0,02 | 0,39 | <0,001 |
| LVDD/c (mm) | 20, 5 ± 0, 66 | 19, 9 ± 0, 73 | 20, 9 ± 0, 67 | 21, 0 ± 0, 67 | 0,55 | 0,69 | 0,29 |
| LVSD/c (mm) | 10, 1 ± 0, 72 | 9, 26 ± 0, 79 | 10, 7 ± 0, 74 | 9, 96 ± 0, 74 | 0,94 | 0,28 | 0,39 |
| PWT/c (mm/g) | 4, 39 ± 0, 17 | 4, 15 ± 0, 19 | 4, 76 ± 0, 17 | 3, 97 ± 0, 17 | 0,01 | 0,006 | 0,58 |
| RWT | 0, 42 ± 0, 02 | 0, 42 ± 0, 02 | 0, 46 ± 0, 02 | 0, 38 ± 0, 02 | 0,03 | 0,08 | 0,93 |
| LA/c (mm/g) | 10, 1 ± 0, 45 | 11, 1 ± 0, 48 | 12, 3 ± 0, 45 | 11, 3 ± 0, 48 | 0,004 | 0,93 | 0,01 |
| LA/AO (mm) | 1, 03 ± 0, 05 | 1, 15 ± 0, 05 | 1, 14 ± 0, 05 | 01, 15 ± 0, 05 | 0,26 | 0,22 | 0,27 |
|
| 78, 0 ± 4, 63 | 78, 4 ± 4, 88 | 49, 0 ± 4, 63 | 68, 4 ± 4, 88 | 0,05 | 0,03 | <0,001 |
|
| 88, 1 ± 9, 23 | 82, 7 ± 4, 46 | 72, 8 ± 4, 22 | 74, 2 ± 4, 48 | 0,44 | 0,65 | 0,001 |
|
| 1, 18 ± 0, 11 | 1, 11 ± 0, 12 | 1, 60 ± 0, 11 | 1, 09 ± 0, 12 | 0,07 | 0,02 | 0,09 |
| IRTc (m/s) | 4, 08 ± 0, 06 | 3, 99 ± 0, 06 | 4, 11 ± 0, 06 | 4, 08 ± 0, 06 | 0,60 | 0,30 | 0,35 |
| SF | 0, 51 ± 0, 02 | 0, 53 ± 0, 03 | 0, 49 ± 0, 02 | 0, 53 ± 0, 02 | 0,72 | 0,24 | 0,74 |
| LVMI | 1, 75 ± 0, 33 | 1, 71 ± 0, 39 | 1, 92 ± 0, 39 | 1, 72 ± 0, 39 | 0,37 | 0,19 | 0,35 |
Groups: C: control; GT: green tea; D: doxorubicin; DGT: doxorubicin+green tea. HR: heart rate in beats per minute; LVDD/c: left ventricular diastolic diameter corrected for body weight; LVSD/c: left ventricular systolic diameter corrected for body weight; PWT: posterior wall thickness; LA/c: left atrium diameter corrected for body weight; LA/AO: left atrium diameter corrected for aorta; A: wave ratio (represents the peak velocity of transmitral flow during atrial contraction); E: wave ratio (represents the peak velocity of early ventricular filling); IRTc: isovolumetric relaxation time; SF: shortening fraction. Values are expressed in mean ± standard deviation. P value: two-way ANOVA. Pi: P value of interaction; Pgt: P value of green tea; Pd: P value of doxorubicin. When we observed the interaction between factors doxorubicin and green tea, we considered Pi < 0, 05. HR: C ≠ GT, C ≠ D, and DGT ≠ D. PWT/c: D ≠ DGT. LA/c: D ≠ C, DGT ≠ D. RWT: D ≠ DGT. Comparisons without interaction: a wave and E/A: (GT + DGT) ≠ (C + D), A and E waves: (C + GT) ≠ (D + DGT).
Cardiac oxidative stress forty-eight hours after doxorubicin injection.
| C ( | GT ( | D ( | DGT ( |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LH (nmol/g of tissue) | 206 ± 34, 2 | 181 ± 6, 30 | 265 ± 18, 0 | 166 ± 8, 97 | <0,001 | 0,002 | 0,22 |
| CAT ( | 59, 1 ± 10, 5 | 37, 4 ± 7, 01 | 34, 8 ± 7, 18 | 41, 4 ± 5, 24 | 0,002 | 0,30 | <0,001 |
| SOD (nmol/g of tissue) | 17, 1 ± 1, 40 | 16, 7 ± 2, 46 | 13, 4 ± 0, 10 | 11, 2 ± 2, 82 | 0,01 | 0,01 | <0,001 |
| GPx (nmol/g of tissue) | 27, 6 ± 9, 10 | 28, 3 ± 1, 72 | 13, 7 ± 6, 05 | 20, 5 ± 2, 00 | 0,01 | 0,70 | <0,001 |
Groups: C: control; GT: green tea; D: doxorubicin; DGT: doxorubicin+green tea. LH: lipid hydroperoxide; CAT: catalase; SOD: superoxide dismutase; GPx: glutathione peroxidase. Values are expressed in mean ± standard deviation. P value: two-way ANOVA. Pi: P value of interaction; Pgt: P value of green tea; Pd: P value of doxorubicin. We observed the interaction between factors in all the variables evidenced by Pi < 0, 05. LH: D ≠ DGT, D ≠ C. CAT: C ≠ GT, CP ≠ D. SOD: C ≠ GT, C ≠ D, and GT ≠ DGT. GPx: D ≠ DGT, C ≠ D.
Cardiac energy metabolism forty-eight hours after doxorubicin injection.
| C ( | GT ( | D ( | DGT ( |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFK (nmol/g tissue) | 0, 90 ± 0, 28 | 1, 28 ± 0, 34 | 1, 86 ± 0, 31 | 1, 16 ± 0, 41 | <0,001 | 0,23 | 0,003 |
| LDH (nmol/mg tissue) | 3, 51 ± 0, 25 | 3, 50 ± 0, 15 | 7, 69 ± 1, 41 | 5, 05 ± 0, 51 | <0,001 | <0,001 | <0,001 |
| PDH (nmol/g tissue) | 1, 03 ± 0, 21 | 0, 97 ± 0, 10 | 1, 03 ± 0, 14 | 0, 88 ± 0, 13 | 0,46 | 0,10 | 0,42 |
| CS (nmol/mg tissue) | 48, 22 ± 8, 58 | 45, 52 ± 5, 05 | 29, 05 ± 5, 68 | 35, 48 ± 6, 22 | 0,08 | 0,46 | <0,001 |
| 3-OHADH (nmol/mg tissue) | 20, 91 ± 2, 10 | 19, 79 ± 2, 74 | 10, 60 ± 1, 56 | 18, 89 ± 2, 24 | <0,001 | 0,55 | <0,001 |
| Complex I (nmol/mg tissue) | 44, 38 ± 5, 97 | 45, 9 ± 5, 20 | 34, 2 ± 4, 42 | 30, 20 ± 6, 14 | 0,19 | 0,55 | <0,001 |
| Complex II (nmol/mg tissue) | 9, 16 ± 1, 97 | 8, 53 ± 1, 75 | 4, 80 ± 1, 23 | 5, 57 ± 0, 88 | 0,26 | 0,91 | <0,001 |
| ATPs (nmol/mg tissue) | 25, 39 ± 3, 00 | 21, 86 ± 2, 89 | 16, 55 ± 2, 02 | 18, 83 ± 5, 15 | 0,03 | 0,63 | <0,001 |
Groups: C: control; GT: green tea; D: doxorubicin; DGT: doxorubicin+green tea. PFK: phosphofructokinase; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase; CS: citrate synthase; β-OHADH: L-3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase; complex I (NADH dehydrogenase): nicotinamide adenine nucleotide dehydrogenase; complex II: succinate oxide reductase; ATPs: adenosine triphosphate synthase. Values are expressed in mean ± standard deviation. P value: two-way ANOVA. Pi: P value of interaction; Pgt: P value of green tea; Pd: P value of doxorubicin. When we observed the interaction between factors (Pi < 0, 05), we compared the groups. PFK: C ≠ D, C ≠ GT, and D ≠ DGT; LDH: C ≠ DX, C ≠ GT, and D ≠ DGT; β-OHADH: C ≠ D, C ≠ GT, and D ≠ DGT; ATPs: C ≠ D, C ≠ GT. Comparisons without interactions: CS, complex I, complex II: (C + GT) ≠ (D + DGT).
Figure 2Plot and western blot images showed the expression of proteins in the heart forty-eight hours after injection with doxorubicin (DOX). Groups: C: control; GT: green tea; D: doxorubicin; DGT: doxorubicin+green tea. PPARα: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; AMPKα: activated protein kinase; TNFα: tumor necrosis factor-alpha; P-akt/T-akt: protein kinase B phosphorylated; Top2-β: topoisomerase IIβ. Pi: P value for interaction between factors GT and DOX. Pgt: P value for the differences between the groups with GT and without GT; Pd: P value for the differences between the groups with DOX and without DOX. For PPARα: Pi = 0,001 and AMPKα: Pi = 0, 04, there were interactions between GT and DOX. Thus, for PPARα and AMPKα, we considered ∗DGT ≠ C, ∗∗D ≠ GT, ∗∗∗C ≠ GT, and ∗∗∗∗D ≠ GT. Comparisons without interaction considered the groups #DOX (D + DGT) ≠ no DOX (C + GT); > (GT + DGT) ≠ (C + D). For TNFα, Pd = 0, 01 and for P-akt/T-akt, Pd = 0, 02. For Top2-β, Pgt = 0, 03.
Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-2) activation in myocardial tissue forty-eight hours after injection of doxorubicin.
| C ( | GT ( | D ( | DGT ( |
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMP-2at | 9412 ± 6060 | 7690 ± 3939 | 11413 ± 10306 | 8468 ± 12171 | 0,85 | 0,49 | 0,68 |
| MMP-2int. | 21907 ± 10304 | 23576 ± 11532 | 54553 ± 26211 | 32163 ± 32206 | 0,16 | 0,23 | 0,02 |
| MMP-2inat | 35800 ± 21485 | 34116 ± 32446 | 48421 ± 29076 | 48677 ± 32498 | 0,93 | 0,95 | 0,24 |
| MMP-2at/inat | 2, 41 ± 0, 62 | 1, 14 ± 0, 74 | 1, 94 ± 1, 76 | 1, 11 ± 1, 80 | 0,81 | 0,79 | 0,72 |
| MMP-2int/inat | 0, 89 ± 0, 62 | 0, 86 ± 0, 43 | 1, 94 ± 1, 58 | 0, 57 ± 0, 21 | 0,09 | 0,13 | 0,53 |
Groups: C: control; GT: green tea; D: doxorubicin; DGT: doxorubicin+green tea. MMP-2a: active matrix metalloproteinase; MMP-2int: intermediary matrix metalloproteinase; MMP-2inat: inactive matrix metalloproteinase. Values are expressed in mean ± standard deviation. P value: two-way ANOVA. Pi: P value of interaction; Pgt: P value of green tea; Pd: P value of doxorubicin. When we observed the interaction between factors (Pi < 0, 05), we compared the groups. MMP-2int: D ≠ C, D ≠ GT, DGT ≠ C, and DGT ≠ GT.
Figure 3Inflammatory cells and interstitial collagen fraction. Groups: C: control; GT: green tea; D: doxorubicin; DGT: doxorubicin+green tea. In the microscopic images, animal 1 corresponds to group C; 2, GT; 3, DGT; and 4, D. Col I: collagen I; Col III: collagen III; box and bars are expressed in mean ± standard deviation. Pi: P value of interaction; Pgt: P value of green tea; Pd: P value of doxorubicin. After the statistical analysis using two-way ANOVA, no interactions were observed for these data. CD45: #comparisons without interaction considered the differences between: DOX (D + DGT) ≠ no DOX (C + GT): Pd value < 0,001. Collagen fractional area: Col I, Col III: all the comparisons presented P > 0, 05.