Shilai Li1, Jijin Zhu1, Ling Pan2, Peiqi Wan3, Quanlin Qin1, Daqing Luo1, Wenhui Pan1, Yuqing Wei1, Yansong Xu1, Liming Shang4, Xinping Ye4. 1. Department of Emergency, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China. 2. Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China. 3. Department of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China. 4. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi 530021, P.R. China.
Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury remains the major cause of liver injury during major liver resection and transplantation (1,2). Oxidative stress is supposed to be the major initiating mechanism (3,4). In recent decades, increasing studiesintended to illuminate the molecular and pathological mechanisms in liver I/R injury have been reported; however, only a partial understanding of these processes is currently available (1,2). I/R injury is a critical condition caused by interrupted blood supply, and potentially, it is caused by hypoxia/reoxygenation (H/R) (5-7). The in vitro H/R-induced injury model is the best model available with which to mimic and study the in vivo I/R injury (5-7). Excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) along with a dramatic decrease in antioxidant defenses is observed during H/R (3,8). Oxidative damage and inflammatory responses are responsible for I/R injury and H/R injury (3,8). Thus, these attributes could serve as therapeutic targets for the prevention and treatment of I/R injury.Hesperidin (HDN) is a bioflavonoid with antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects (9-12). It was reported that HDN has hydrogen radical- and hydrogen peroxide-removal activities and serves an antioxidant role in biological systems (9,10). We and others have revealed that HDN has a protective effect against I/R injury (13-17). It is also reported that HDN protects against H/R injury in vitro in rat cardiomyocytes and a human first-trimester trophoblast cell line (18,19). However, whether HDN protects hepatocytes (HCs) against H/R-induced injury remains unknown.The present study hypothesized that HDN may ameliorate H/R-induced injury in HCs in vitro. HCs were isolated and cultured under H/R conditions with or without HDN exposure. The present study revealed that HDN ameliorated H/R-induced injury in HCs in vitro. Furthermore, the results demonstrated that HDN attenuated HC oxidative stress and inflammatory responses while enhancing autophagy during H/R. Thus, exposure to HDN may have a protective effect on HCs during H/R-induced injury.
Materials and methods
Hepatocyte isolation and culture
A total of 3 male C57BL/6J WT mice aged 8-12 weeks and weighing 22-30 g were purchased from and housed in Guangxi Medical University Laboratory Animal Center (Guangxi, China). The mice were bred in a specific pathogen-free animal facility under controlled conditions at 19-23˚C and 40-60% humidity with a 12-h dark/light cycle and had free access to food and water. HCs were isolated from mice as described previously (17,20). Briefly, the mice wereeuthanized with 5% isoflurane for 5 min in a plexiglass chamber, followed by bilateral thoracotomy for a secondary confirmation of death. Thenthe mice were perfused using an in situ collagenase (type VI; WorthingtonBiochemical Corporation) technique in vivo. HCs were separated from nonparenchymal cells and purified to >99% purity with a viability >95%, as confirmed by trypan blue exclusion. HCs were cultured as described previously (17,21). HCs (1.5x105 cells/ml) were plated on gelatin-coated culture plates with collagen I (BD Pharmingen; BD Biosciences) in cell culture medium. The cell culture media contained Williams medium E (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with 10% calf serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 15 mM HEPES (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 1 µM insulin (Eli Lilly and Company), 2 mM L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 U/ml; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). HCs were cultured overnight at 37˚C, and the culture medium was replaced with fresh medium before the experimental treatment. For H/R treatment, HCs were incubated under hypoxic conditions (1% oxygen for 10 h) following reoxygenation (normoxic conditions for 8 h). HCs were divided into the following groups: Control PBS group (HCs were subjected to normoxia with PBS, 18 h), control HDN group (HCs were subjected to normoxia with 50 µg/ml HDN, 18 h), H/RPBS group (HCs were subjected to H/R with PBS, H/R for 10 and 8 h as aforementioned) and H/RHDN group (HCs were subjected to H/R with 50 µg/ml HDN, H/R for 10 and 8 h as aforementioned).
Reagents
For western blotting, the autophagy antibody sample kit (cat. no. 4445; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.; 1:1,000) was used, which targets the proteins microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3α (MAP1LC3A, also known as LC3), Beclin-1, and sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1, also known as P62). GAPDH (cat. no. ab8245; Abcam; 1:2,500) was used as the internal control. The goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (cat. no. 31430) and goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (cat. no. 31460) (both at 1:20,000 dilution) were from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. HDN (HPLC >98%; cat. no. XW05202631) was obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. The malondialdehyde assay kit (MDA; cat. no. A003-1), superoxide dismutase assay kit (SOD; cat. no. A001-1), glutathione assay kit (GSH; cat. no. A006-1), interleukin-6 assay kit (IL-6; cat. no. H007) and tumor necrosis factor-α assay kit (TNF-α; cat. no. H052) were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute.
Supernatant sample assays
Supernatant alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were measured using an ALT assay kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (cat. no. C009-2-1; Nanjing Jiancheng Institute of Biotechnology) and analyzed byspectrophotometry. The levels of ALT were expressed as units per liter of supernatant (U/l). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released into the medium solution from dead cells was measured by a LDH assay kit (cat. no. A020-2-2; Nanjing Jiancheng Institute of Biotechnology) according to the manufacturer's instructions and analyzed by spectrophotometry. The levels of LDH were expressed as units per liter of supernatant (U/l).
Cellular viability assay
The images of the cell morphology were captured using a light microscope (XDS-1A; Shanghai Precision Instrument Co., Ltd.). Cell viability was measured using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The MTT assays were quantified by reading the absorbance on a plate reader. The wavelength to measure the absorbance (Abs) of each sample was 492 nm. MTT reduction measured at 492 nm was converted to percentage cell viability according to the following formula: % cell viability=[(Abs 492 nm of treated group-blank)/(Abs 492 nm of control-blank)] x100.
Intracellular ROS assessment
Intracellular ROS levels were assessed using a ROSkit (cat. no. CA1410; Beijing Solarbio Science﹠Technology Co., Ltd.). Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) was diluted (1:1,000) with serum-free medium to 10 µmol/l. After the HCs were treated, the cells were washed and incubated with DCFH-DA for 20 min at 37˚C. Then the cells were washed three times before assessment. Fluorescence was detected and photographed with an inverted fluorescent microscope (magnification, x200; IX71; Olympus Corporation).
Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
RT-qPCR was performed as previously described (17). Briefly, total RNA was extracted with the RNeasy mini kit (QiagenGmbH), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then, complementary DNA (cDNA) was generated from 1 µg of total RNA with 2 µM oligo-dT primersand the Omniscript™ reverse transcriptase (both Qiagen GmbH). The iTaq SYBR-Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) with specific primers for β-actin, IL-6, and TNF-α (Qiagen GmbH) was used to perform qPCR. All samples were assayed in duplicate and normalized to the β-actin mRNA abundance. Gene expression levels were quantified using the 2-ΔΔCq method (22). The primers used for qPCR were the same as previously described (17).
Western blotting analysis
The western blotting protocol was the same as that previously described (17,23). Briefly, HCs were collected in lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), sonicated, and centrifuged (16,000 x g for 15 min, 4˚C), after which the supernatant was collected. Protein concentrations were measured using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Samples were then run on SDS-PAGE and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Then the membrane was incubated with primary and secondary antibodies, before being developed by an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The signal was acquired with a ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-RadLaboratories, Inc.).
Autophagic flux
Autophagic flux was assessed as described previously (23). HCs were first cultured under hypoxic conditions, and then received reoxygenation with exposure to bafilomycin A1 (50 nM) treatment for 1 h (final hour of 8 h reoxygenation procedure). Western blotting was performed to analyse LC3 I: II conversion. In order to measure the accumulation of LC3 in HCs, the GFP-LC3adenovirus was transfected into HCs before hypoxia, and then the HCs received the H/R procedure involving bafilomycin A1 exposure. HCs transfected with GFP-LC3 were photographed with a Zeiss LSM510 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss AG). GFP-LC3 puncta were counted with at least 5 green dots/cell from at least 30 cells/treatment.
Results
Hesperidin protects HCs against H/R injury
To determine the appropriate dose of HDN for HC treatment, HCs were isolated and exposed to different doses of HDN under normoxic conditions. As shown in Fig. 1A, there were significant side effects on cell viability with HDN doses >50 µg/ml. Therefore, the dose 50 µg/ml of HDN was used for subsequent experiments.
Figure 1
HDN protects HCs against H/R injury. (A) Cell viability was determined by MTT assay for HCs exposed to different doses of HDN under normoxic conditions. (B) Morphology of HCs in control PBS group, control HDN group, H/R PBS group and H/R HDN group under a light microscope (scale bar, 50 µm). (C) Cell viability was determined by MTT assayfor HCs in control PBS group, control HDN group, H/R PBS group and H/R HDN group. (D) Levels of supernatant LDH and (E) ALT in control PBS group, control HDN group, H/R PBS group and H/R HDN group. Results areshown as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. ***P<0.001 with comparisons shown by lines. HDN, hesperidin; HC, hepatocyte; H/R, hypoxia/reoxygenation; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ns, not significant.
To determine the role of HDN in H/R-induced HC injury, HCs were isolated and cultured under H/R conditions with or without HDN treatment. HC injury was evaluated by microscopic visualization of cell morphology and measured by an MTT assay and by detecting supernatant LDH and ALT levels. HCs appeared to be swelled into spherical shapes, and exhibited membrane rupture, nuclei pyknotic and nuclear condensation after H/R-induced injury under a light microscope (Fig. 1B). HDN treatment appeared to partially maintain HC cell morphology and numbers (Fig. 1B). The results of the MTT assay revealed that HC damage was significantly induced under H/R (Fig. 1C). As shown in Fig. 1B and C, HDN alone had no effect on HC morphology and cell viability. However, HDN treatment significantly ameliorated the cell viability under H/R conditions (Fig. 1C). Similarly, supernatant LDH levels and ALT levels increased significantly during H/R, and these levels were significantly reversed by HDN treatment (Fig. 1D and E). Taken together, these data indicated that HDN protected HCs against H/R-induced injury.
Hesperidin attenuates HC oxidative stress induced by H/R
The most characteristic mechanism of H/R-induced injury is oxidative stress (3,8). HDN has been reported to attenuate oxidative stress in many situations, such as in I/R injury and toxin-induced damage (17,24). To explore whether HDN attenuates oxidative stress during H/R, the levels of MDA, SOD, GSH and ROS were detected using commercial kits. Notably, compared with that of the control group, the MDA content increased significantly during H/R; however, this change was significantly reversed by exposure to HDN (Fig. 2A). By contrast, compared with that of the control group the antioxidant activities of SOD and GSH decreased significantly during H/R, and these effects were reversed by exposure to HDN (Fig. 2B and C). Similar findings were obtained using a fluorescent dye assay to detect the levels of ROS; H/R significantly induced ROS levels in HCs, while this was effectively reversed by HDN treatment (Fig. 2C). Taken together, these data indicated that HDN attenuated HC oxidative stress induced by H/R.
Figure 2
HDN attenuates hepatocyte oxidative stress induced by H/R. (A) MDA, (B) SOD, (C) GSH and (D) ROSlevels in control PBS group, control HDN group, H/R PBS group and H/R HDN group. ROS (green) was detected by fluorescence microscopy (magnification, x40). Results are shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. ***P<0.001 with comparisons shown by lines. HDN, hesperidin; H/R, hypoxia/reoxygenation; MDA, malondialdehyde; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH, glutathione; ROS, reactive oxygen species; ns, not significant.
Figure 3
HDN ameliorates HC inflammatory responses during H/R. (A) mRNA expression levels of IL-6 in control PBS group, control HDN group, H/R PBS group and H/R HDN group. (B) Levels of IL-6 in supernatants assessed by ELISA. (C) mRNA expression levels of TNF-α. (D) Levels of TNF-α in supernatants assessed by ELISA. Results are shown as the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. ***P<0.001 with comparisons shown by lines. HDN, hesperidin; HC, hepatocyte; H/R, hypoxia/reoxygenation; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; ns, not significant.
Hesperidin ameliorates HC inflammatory responses during H/R
The mechanisms of H/R-induced injury include both direct cellular damage resulting from oxidative stress and injury resulting from non-sterile inflammatory responses (3,8). It has been reported that numerous cytokines are involved in H/R-induced injury (25-27). To ascertain the relationship between HDN and inflammation during H/R-induced injury, the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were assessed by RT-qPCR and ELISA. The results demonstrated that, compared with those of the control group, the mRNA expression levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in HCs and the concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-α in the supernatants increased significantly following H/R, and HDN treatment significantly ameliorated these effects (Fig. 3). Thus, these data indicated that HDN ameliorated HC inflammatory responses during H/R.
Hesperidin induces autophagy to protect HCs against H/R injury
Cell death is the end result of H/R-induced injury and can propagate injury through the activation of inflammatory pathways (25-27). It has been reported that autophagy protects against liver I/R injury in vivo and protects HCs against H/R injury in vitro (23). We and others have demonstrated that HDN protects against I/R injury (13-17). To determine whether HDN may regulate protective autophagy during H/R injury, the present study assessed the levels of specific autophagic markers in HCs with or without HDN exposure during H/R injury. Western blotting results demonstrated that LC3-Ⅱ and Beclin-1 protein expression levels increased, while P62 levels decreased during H/R upon exposure to HDN (Fig. 4A). It is important to know whether autophagosomes were formed from new autophagosome formation or from the blockade of autophagosome degradation during autophagy. To investigate these possibilities, HCs were cultured with or without HDN treatment under exposure to bafilomycin A1, which inhibits autophagolysosomal fusion and degradation, and then the HCs were subjected to normoxia or H/R. Western blotting results demonstrated that LC3-Ⅱ levels increased in HCs with or without HDN treatment under the normoxia condition (Fig. 4B). However, LC3-Ⅱ levels only increased in HCs exposed to HDN under the H/R conditions (Fig. 4C). In addition, GFP-LC3 was transfected into HCs and the accumulation of GFP-LC3 puncta was quantified by confocal microscopy. Consistent with the western blotting results, the numbers of GFP-LC3 puncta in HCs with exposure to HDN were greater compared with those observed in HCs without HDN exposure under the H/R conditions after bafilomycin A1 treatment (Fig. 4D). Taken together, these data indicated that HDN induced autophagy to protect HCs against H/R injury.
Figure 4
HDN induces autophagy to protect HCs against H/R injury. (A) Representative western blots showing the protein expression levels of LC3, Beclin-1 and P62 in control PBS group, control HDN group, H/R PBS group and H/R HDN group. (B) Representative western blots showing the levels of LC3 in HCs subjected to normoxia with or without bafilomycin A1 (50 nM). (C) Representative western blots showing the levels of LC3 in HCs subjected to H/R with or without bafilomycin A1 (50 nM). (D) Confocal microscopy images of HCs overexpressing GFP-LC3 (green) and subjected to normoxia or H/R, with/without bafilomycin A1 (50 nM) treatment (magnification, x40). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). The numbers of GFP-LC3 puncta were counted per cell and represented in the bar graph. Results are shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. **P<0.01 with comparisons shown by lines. HDN, hesperidin; HC, hepatocyte; H/R, hypoxia/reoxygenation; LC3, microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3α; P62, sequestosome 1; ns, not significant.
Discussion
HDN is a flavonoid extracted from plants belonging to the families Lamiaceae and Betulaceae with a variety of bioactivities (9). It has been revealed that HDN has a variety of beneficial qualities, such as attenuating apoptosis, ameliorating hypotension, preventing hepatic steatosis, impairing dengue virus replication, and suppressing cancer proliferation (9-12). Additionally, it ameliorates I/R injury by attenuating oxidative stress and inflammation responses (17). However, whether HDN protects HCs against H/R-induced injury in vitro was largely unknown. The present study provided strong evidence that HDN protected HCs against H/R-induced injury by attenuating oxidative stress and ameliorating inflammatory responses while promoting autophagy. Thus, the current results identified HDN as a potential protective factor for HCs. These findings indicated that HDN may serve as a natural compound for ameliorating HC injury during H/R.I/R injury remains a critical challenge because it results in cell death and organ failure (28-30). Increasing evidence has revealed that the basic pathophysiology of I/R is initiated from anaerobic metabolism and increasing ROS production (31,32). The dramatically increased content of ROS is due to excessive production of ROS and lower levels of antioxidant factors (33,34). Thus, how to balance the oxidative stress is a crucial point in dealing with I/R injury. Increasing studies have revealed that HDN possesses an antioxidant effect (9). The present studydemonstrated that the MDA content and ROS levels increased during H/R and were significantly reversed following exposure to HDN. However, the antioxidant indicators SOD and GSH decreased during H/R and were reversed following exposure to HDN. Taken together, these results suggested that HDN attenuated HC oxidative stress induced by H/R, which is consistent with previous studies (19,35,36). Ebegboni et al (19) found that flavonoids were associated with ROS modulation, reducing the generation of superoxide/hydrogen peroxide during H/R-induced oxidative stress in a human first-trimester trophoblast cell line. Chen et al (35) observed that hesperitin (an active metabolite of HDN) significantly attenuated oxidative stress-induced apoptosis by reducing ROS levels in cisplatin-treated HK-2 cells in vitro. In a sodium arsenite (SA)-induced nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity model, Turk et al (36) observed that HDN co-treatment had an antioxidant effect on SA-induced toxicity and aided in protecting the tissue architecture by decreasing MDA and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine levels and increasing the GSH level and SOD, catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activities. However, the mechanism by which HDN regulates oxidative stress remains unknown.Anti-inflammatory effects are one of the most important effect types of HDN. Excessive inflammatory responses are supposed to be the major mechanism of I/R injury in the later phase (8). Regulating inflammatory responses provides a novel therapeutic and preventive target for I/R injury. The present study found that the mRNA expression levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in HCs and the concentrations of IL-6 and TNF-α in the supernatants increased significantly after H/R, and HDN significantly ameliorated these effects. These results suggested that HDN may ameliorate inflammation in H/R. We and others have confirmed that HDN attenuates inflammatory responses in I/R injury (9,17). In a chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS)-induced rat model, Xie et al (37) found that HDN treatment significantly relieved depressive-like behaviors in CUMS rats by decreasing the expression levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in the prefrontal cortex and microglia. In addition, they found that the relative mechanisms were based on the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 inflammatory signaling pathway (37). Heo et al (38) revealed that HDN treatment in rats with spinal cord injury reduced neuropathological changes (includinghemorrhage, inflammatory cell infiltration, and tissue loss) and levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α. Collectively, these data imply that HDN ameliorates inflammatory responses to protect against tissue injury.Autophagy is required in diverse paradigms of lifespan extension, leading to the prevailing notion that autophagy can maintain cell homeostasis and ensure cell survival under stressful conditions (39,40). We and others have revealed that autophagy has a pivotal role in maintaining cell survival following liver I/R injury (23,41). The present study found that the protein levels of autophagy makers LC3-Ⅱ and Beclin-1 increased, while P62 levels decreased during H/R under exposure to HDN. Under exposure to bafilomycin A1, which inhibits autophagolysosomal fusion and degradation, LC3-Ⅱ levels increased in HCs exposed to HDN under the H/R conditions. Furthermore, the results were confirmed by microscopic evaluation of GFP-LC3 puncta in HCs through confocal microscopy. Taken together, these results suggested that HDN induced autophagy to protect HCs against H/R injury. In a previous study, Saiprasad et al (42) found that HDN supplementation initiated apoptosis via targeted inhibition of constitutively activated Aurora-A-mediated PI3K/Akt/glycogen synthase kinase-3β and mTOR pathways coupled with autophagic stimulation against azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis. Zhu et al (43) revealed that autophagic activation may be involved in the mechanism of hesperidin's therapeutic effects on cognitive impairment. However, Li et al (15) found that excessive autophagy exacerbates myocardial I/R injury and that HDN could reduce myocardial I/R injury by suppressing excessive autophagy. These opposing observations deserve further study and discussion. In a previous study, Turk et al (36) found that HDN could decrease oxidative stress, inhibit inflammation and reduce apoptosis to protect against SA-induced liver toxicity. The present study revealed that HDN attenuated oxidative stress, inhibited the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and induced autophagy to protect hepatocytes against H/R-induced injury. Induction of autophagy may be the underlying mechanism by which HDN aids in hepatoprotection.As aforementioned, the effects of HDN on autophagy appear to be controversial. In the present study, cultured HCs were injured by H/R stimulation, presumably by oxidative stress. HDN exposure rescued the damaging effects of H/R stimulation. Additionally, exposure toHDNincreased autophagy in H/R-treated HCs, as shown in Fig. 4. It would be interesting to know how much death in HCs after H/R treatment was due to autophagy and how much was due to oxidative injury, however this is difficult to determine. It appears that HDN exposure could reduce oxidative stress levels by approximately half, according to Fig. 2. It has been reported that oxidative stress and inflammatory activity are two early events in the cascade of I/R injury and H/R injury (41,44). These two factors also directly trigger the development of autophagy (41,44). Taken together, it can be assumed that appropriate autophagy activity contributes to HC recovery by reducing oxidative stress and inflammatory activity, while autophagy dysfuntion aggravates HC injury (Fig. 5). The detailed mechanisms by which HDN regulates oxidative stress, inflammatory activity and autophagy balance deserve further study in the future.
Figure 5
Schematic demonstrating the interplay among oxidative stress, inflammatory activity, and autophagy following H/R injury. H/R leads to oxidative stress, inflammatory activity, and autophagy, while HDN exposure inhibits these effects. Both oxidative stress and inflammation induce autophagy and HC injury. Appropriate autophagy activity contributes to HC recovery by reducing oxidative stress and inflammatory activity, while autophagy dysfunction aggravates HC injury. HDN exposure promotes the effects of autophagy, thus reducing HCinjury. H/R, hypoxia/reoxygenation; HDN, hesperidin; HC, hepatocyte.
In summary, the present study demonstrated that HDN attenuated HC oxidative stress and inflammatory responses while enhancing autophagy during H/R. HDN may have a protective effect on HCs during H/R-induced injury. These findings broaden our understanding of the functions of HDN in acute sterile inflammation and raise the possibility that HDN may be used to protect organs against I/R injury.
Authors: Gertrude J Nieuwenhuijs-Moeke; Søren E Pischke; Stefan P Berger; Jan Stephan F Sanders; Robert A Pol; Michel M R F Struys; Rutger J Ploeg; Henri G D Leuvenink Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Vinícius de Paiva Gonçalves; Marta Liliana Musskopf; Angeliz Rivera-Concepcion; Christina Yu; Sing Wai Wong; Stephen A Tuin; Yizu Jiao; Cristiano Susin; Luís Carlos Spolidorio; Patricia Almeida Miguez Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-26 Impact factor: 6.208