Kaja I Ritzau-Reid1, Christopher D Spicer2, Amy Gelmi3, Christopher L Grigsby4, James F Ponder5, Victoria Bemmer1, Adam Creamer1, Ramon Vilar5, Andrea Serio6, Molly M Stevens7. 1. Department of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 2. Department of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden; Department of Chemistry, York Biomedical Research Institute, University of York, Heslington YO10 5DD, UK. 3. Department of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; Applied Chemistry and Environmental Science, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia. 4. Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden. 5. Department of Chemistry, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK. 6. Department of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; Centre for Craniofacial & Regenerative Biology, King's College London and The Francis Crick Institute, Tissue Engineering and Biophotonics Division, Dental Institute, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK. 7. Department of Materials, Department of Bioengineering, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden.
Abstract
The unique electrochemical properties of the conductive polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) make it an attractive material for use in neural tissue engineering applications. However, inadequate mechanical properties, and difficulties in processing and lack of biodegradability have hindered progress in this field. Here, the functionality of PEDOT:PSS for neural tissue engineering is improved by incorporating 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) oligomers, synthesized using a novel end-capping strategy, into block co-polymers. By exploiting end-functionalized oligoEDOT constructs as macroinitiators for the polymerization of poly(caprolactone), a block co-polymer is produced that is electroactive, processable, and bio-compatible. By combining these properties, electroactive fibrous mats are produced for neuronal culture via solution electrospinning and melt electrospinning writing. Importantly, it is also shown that neurite length and branching of neural stem cells can be enhanced on the materials under electrical stimulation, demonstrating the promise of these scaffolds for neural tissue engineering.
The unique electrochemical properties of the conductive polymer poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) make it an attractive material for use in neural tissue engineering applications. However, inadequate mechanical properties, and difficulties in processing and lack of biodegradability have hindered progress in this field. Here, the functionality of PEDOT:PSS for neural tissue engineering is improved by incorporating 3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT) oligomers, synthesized using a novel end-capping strategy, into block co-polymers. By exploiting end-functionalized oligoEDOT constructs as macroinitiators for the polymerization of poly(caprolactone), a block co-polymer is produced that is electroactive, processable, and bio-compatible. By combining these properties, electroactive fibrous mats are produced for neuronal culture via solution electrospinning and melt electrospinning writing. Importantly, it is also shown that neurite length and branching of neural stem cells can be enhanced on the materials under electrical stimulation, demonstrating the promise of these scaffolds for neural tissue engineering.
To investigate fundamental questions in human brain development and disease,
tissue engineering approaches have employed 3D polymer based biomaterial scaffolds
as guidance cues to grow 3D neuronal cultures in conditions resembling the in vivo
environment.[ Yet, fully recapitulating all
functional aspects of neuronal networks within an in vitro system still presents
significant challenges, due to the complex physiological environment of the brain.
An ideal biomaterial for complex functional neural cultures must be able to provide
both precise architectural control to guide neural growth and effective electrical
communication to interface with electrically excitable neural cells.[ There is therefore a pressing need
for new 3D electroactive biomaterials able to mediate neural tissue engineering.Advances in bio-fabrication technologies have led to promising developments
in specialized 3D architectures for neural tissue engineering, including 3D
scaffolds with microscale or nanoscale topography to guide cellular
interactions.[ Techniques such as
electrospinning have been used to create biomimetic fibrous matrices which have
successfully been applied for the growth of neural networks, as suitably aligned
nanoscale fibers can provide directionality for the growth of neurons.[ More
recently, melt electrospinning writing (MEW) has emerged as a promising method to
deposit highly defined fibrous scaffolds.[ This technique has so far been minimally used in neural
tissue engineering, yet has numerous advantages including reproducible and precise
control over fiber diameter and scaffold architecture. MEW therefore provides
exciting opportunities for specific cell guidance and the creation of networks with
precise alignment and directionality.[ The absence of solvents during fabrication by MEW also
minimizes toxicity issues during cell culture.Incorporating electroactive functionality into neural scaffolds has been
shown to aid recapitulation of in vivo biological environments.[ Neurons are connected to each other via synapses, which
are used to translate changes in membrane potential into biochemical messages that
are exchanged between neighboring neurons and propagate ongoing signals within the
network. Although the membrane potential is determined by ion exchange, exogenous
electrical stimulation can be a useful tool to interface with living neurons, and in
previous studies it has been shown to enhance neuronal differentiation and neurite
outgrowth.[ Conjugated polymer (CP)-based materials have therefore
recently gained significant attention in the field of neural tissue engineering due
to their capacity to conduct charge through the transport of both electrons and
ions.[ The versatility and flexibility
of polymer synthesis also enables the production of varied scaffold architectures,
in contrast to traditional metal electrodes, bridging the communication gap between
biology and electronics.[ When compared to metal
electrodes, CPs have been shown to be beneficial for neural tissue engineering due
to their ability to modulate material stiffness and impedance to better match that
of neural tissue.[ The lower
stiffness of CPs compared to metal electrodes has been shown to improve long-term
contact with neuronal cells and the electrode, by reducing the mechanical mismatch
and reactive tissue response to stiff metal devices, prolonging electrical
stimulation and extending beneficial effect on neuronal growth.[ This can
potentially be further improved by incorporating CPs into conjugated hydrogel (CH)
materials, as hydrated hydrogel networks provide an ideal substrate for 3D cell
culture, recreating the environment of native soft tissue, and allowing the
diffusion of nutrients and signaling biomacromolecules.[
Electroactive hydrogels have been shown to permit electrical stimulation of cells in
3D and to mediate biological signaling.[ However, continued issues with
low conductivity have hindered translation of CHs into biomedical
applications.[In the last decade, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate
(PEDOT:PSS) has dominated the CP field, due to its excellent electrical properties,
chemical and thermal stability and low oxidation potential.[ However, despite the promise of CPs as attractive
materials for in vitro models of functional brain tissue, challenges with their use
continue to hinder widespread application in tissue engineering. Difficulties in
functionalization, lack of biodegradability, poor material reproducibility due to
low solubility and processability, and inadequate mechanical properties are
particularly prominent.[Recently, electroactive oligomers have emerged as a promising alternative to
full length CPs.[ Typically they share similar
electrical properties after doping to the corresponding conducting polymer formed
from doping of the parent CP, yet have more potential to install versatile chemical
functionality for further derivatization.[ The use of
conjugated oligomers has several desirable advantages. First, they provide a
precisely defined structure that is in stark contrast to the polydisperse nature of
CPs. This provides improved control and homogeneity of material structure and
function, which is essential to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of signal
transduction at the material-cell interface. Second, the greatly improved solubility
and processability offered by oligomeric structures provides opportunities to
exploit many emerging techniques for advanced biomaterial preparation, and for
synergistically regulating physical, topographical, and electrical cues within a
single scaffold.[ Finally, unlike full length CPs,
short oligomers, typically <10 monomers, can be consumed by macrophages,
allowing the production of materials that are both electroactive and biodegradable.
The benefits of degradable scaffolds for both in vivo and in vitro applications have
been highlighted by a number of recent reports demonstrating the benefits of
material remodeling and degradation by growing cells on tissue development, as well
as for the long term tolerance of hybrid materials.[In 2002, Schmidt and colleagues first demonstrated the feasibility of
incorporating pyrrole oligomers into a fully biodegradable polymer, via degradable
ester linkages.[ Recent studies
from this group reported an oligoaniline based electroactive polymer, with simple
and scalable synthesis and purification, that could be used for electrochemically
triggered delivery of anti-inflammatory drugs.[ Aniline
oligomers have also been explored for use in electroactive biodegradable scaffolds
for soft tissue repair, including a dopant-free conjugated elastomer polymer,
generated by chemically linking conjugated aniline oligomers, biodegradable
poly(caprolactone) (PCL) segments and a dopant component.[ Polyester-based scaffolds are particularly
attractive due to the tunability of polymer degradation rate based on monomer
composition.[ However, it has so far proven
difficult to apply such an approach to PEDOT due to the reported chemical
instability of oligoEDOTs and the lack of free functional groups for further
functionalization. Our group have recently offered a potential solution to this
problem, by reporting the synthesis of precisely defined, glyoxyl-capped,
bifunctional oligoEDOT constructs that are stable, possess tunable properties, and
provide diverse reactive handles for further derivatization.[In the present study, we utilized our oligoEDOT constructs to provide a
modular platform for biomaterial synthesis. End functionalized oligoEDOTs were used
as macroinitiators for the synthesis of PCL block co-polymers and as crosslinkers
for hydrogelation. We show that solvent electrospinning and MEW can be used to
fabricate fibrous scaffolds, with defined nanotopography. This represents a major
advantage of our approach, as these methods cannot typically be applied directly to
PEDOT-based materials, due to their poor processability. Moreover, we demonstrate
that oligoEDOT-PCL is a permissive substrate for neuronal cell culture, and that
electrical stimulation enhances neurite length and branching of neuronal cells.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of End-Functionalized OligoEDOTs
To construct end-functionalized oligoEDOTs we adopted a synthetic
approach recently reported by our group.[ The iterative process consists of thiophene
glyoxylation, bromination, chain extension, and oligomer cross-coupling, and
yields end-functionalized EDOT oligomers of defined chain lengths (Figure S1, Supporting
Information). We previously demonstrated that a variety of functional
end-capping handles could be easily incorporated, enabling the generation of a
diverse range of functionalized alkoxy-thiophene monomers and
oligomers.[ We
reasoned that amino derivatives would provide a versatile reactive handle for
further derivatization, while incorporation of a short triethylene-glycol linker
would provide flexibility and enhanced solubility, facilitating processing and
subsequent modification (Figure 1a). After
treatment of EDOT with oxalyl chloride, the intermediate glyoxylyl chloride
1, was reacted with a mono-Boc (tert-butyloxycarbonyl)
protected, diaminotriethylene-glycol linker 2, to generate the
N-protected, mono-functionalized EDOT monomer
3 (Figure S1,
Supporting Information). Subsequent bromination yielded di-functional
monomer 4, which could undergo subsequent chain extension and
oligomer couplings via palladium-catalyzed direct arylation (Figure S1, Supporting
Information). The use of direct arylation, over alternative
strategies such as Stille or Kumada couplings, limited potential problems with
poor functional group compatibility and residual catalyst toxicity.[ Through this strategy, we
were able to generate a range of protected amine-functionalized oligoEDOTs in an
iterative manner, with defined chain lengths (n =
2–5, 5–8) (Figure S1, Supporting
Information).
Figure 1
Schematic use of oligoEDOTs as components of functional biomaterials.
a) Amine-capped oligoEDOTs synthesized during this study, n
= 2–5. b) Use of amino-oligoEDOT as an initiator for ring-opening
polymerization to generate fibrous ABA-block co-polymers with poly(caprolactone)
(PCL). c) Crosslinking of multi-arm polyethylene glycol (PEG) macromers to form
oligoEDOT based hydrogels.
oligoedot-pcl characterization
To prepare constructs suitable for further processing and scaffold
fabrication, we selected PCL as a suitable co-polymer, due to its biodegradable
properties and well-established use in tissue engineering. Boc-protected dimer
(5), tetramer (7), and pentamer (8)
oligoEDOTs were deprotected under acidic conditions to yield the free amines
(9, 11, and 12 respectively), (Figure S1, Supporting
Information). Ring-opening polymerization of
ε-caprolactone was then undertaken using the
amino-oligoEDOT as a macroinitiator (Figures
1b and 2a). The new ABA block
co-polymer structures (subsequently named oligoEDOT-PCL
16a–c) were synthesized with a total molecular weight of
≈25 kDa (i.e., two PCL chains of ≈12 kDa off a central oligoEDOT
core of ≈1kDa, weight dictated by monomer:oligoEDOT ratio). This
molecular weight was chosen to provide sufficient PCL for improved
processability while maximizing the electroactivity of the oligoEDOT block. To
investigate the optoelectronic properties of the oligoEDOT-PCL constructs,
UV–vis spectra were recorded on thin films (Figure S2, Supporting
Information). Chemically synthesized PEDOT in the neutral (undoped)
state typically absorbs in the visible region from 400 to 600 nm.[ Accordingly, the maximum
absorbance in samples of the three oligoEDOT-PCL films were between 450 and 500
nm, with the absorbance spectra red-shifted with increasing oligomer chain
length as expected with increasing conjugation length (Figure S2, Supporting
Information). The optical band gap
(E
g,opt) was calculated from the onset of
absorption for the three oligoEDOT-PCL films, which ranged from 2.48 eV for
diEDOT-PCL to 2.03 eV for pentaEDOT-PCL, as further detailed in Table S1, Supporting
Information. These observations are consistent with the optical
spectra range of the parent amino-oligoEDOTs and the structures recently
reported by us.[ This
confirmed that incorporation of the oligoEDOT into a PCL ABA block co-polymer
did not significantly alter the optical properties of the EDOT-block.
Figure 2
OligoEDOT-PCL polymerization and characterization.
a) oligoEDOT-PCL synthesis by ring opening polymerization. b) Cyclic voltammogram
(100 mV s−1) of tetramer oligoEDOT-PCL in propylene carbonate
with 0.5 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate as the supporting
electrolyte. c) Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) image of tetramer
oligoEDOT-PCL spin coated film. Scale bar: 10 μm d) KPFM line scan of
surface potential along the black dashed line. e) Tapping mode AFM image of
tetramer oligoEDOT-PCL, high M
w PCL and low
M
w PCL. Scale bars: 500 nm.
Next, we conducted cyclic voltammetry to elucidate the electrochemical
properties of dimer, tetramer and pentamer oligoEDOT-PCL films in organic and
aqueous solutions (Figure 2b and Figure S3, Supporting
Information). TetraEDOT-PCL 16 films provided the most
stable electrochemical behavior over several samples. We therefore used
tetraEDOT-PCL for more in-depth thin film characterization, scaffold
preparation, and neuronal cell culture. The tetraEDOT-PCL film exhibited a broad
anodic (0.8–1.1 V) and a broad cathodic (0.4–1 V) peak, with
tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6) as the supporting
electrolyte at a scan rate of 0.1 V s−1, demonstrating redox
activity corresponding to the formation of a radical cation (Figure 2b).To further examine the electronic properties of the oligoEDOT-PCL films,
we applied Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) to investigate changes in
surface potential at the localized micro-scale. Such experiments provide a more
accurate reflection of the local electrical environment experienced by
individual cells than bulk material measurements. Figure 2c shows a heterogenous surface potential map of the
tetraEDOT-PCL 16b polymer film, with a local surface potential,
V
CPD, obtained from the contact potential
difference (CPD) between the conductive tip and sample. Distinct regions of
lower and higher work functions were evident on the surface of the film. Figure 2d illustrates a line scan along the
black dotted line, depicting the difference in work function between the bright
and dark areas. These results suggest nanoscale aggregation of the conjugated
oligoEDOT on the PCL co-polymer surface.Subsequently, we used atomic force microscopy (AFM) scanning to further
examine the effects of polymerizing PCL with conjugated EDOT oligomers on
surface topography (Figure 2e).
TetraEDOT-PCL films were compared with pure PCL films with a comparable
molecular weight ≈25 kDa, and high molecular weight PCL ≈c75 kDa.
High molecular weight PCL films displayed lamellar structures, which aggregated
into compact spherules of ≈1.5–2 m in size, consistent with
previous reports (Figure 2e).[ Image scans of low molecular
weight PCL films showed a similar surface morphology, with evidence of more
striated lamellar, indicating increased crystallinity, consistent with the
reduced molecular weight. AFM scans of tetraEDOT-PCL revealed distinct
differences in the surface morphology compared to both pure PCL samples, as
individual fibrils of ≈40 nm were resolved on the polymer surface. These
image scans demonstrate that the inclusion of EDOT oligomers influences the
surface morphology. Additionally, by blending oligoEDOT-PCL films with higher
molecular weight PCL at different blend ratios, we were able to tune the
morphological properties of the films (Figure S4, Supporting Information). Polymer blending has
emerged as a versatile technique to adjust material properties, and has
previously been used to combine certain favorable material
properties.[ By
blending oligoEDOT-PCL with high molecular weight PCL, we demonstrate the
possibility to adjust the mechanical properties of the material according to the
application and scaffold type. It is important to note that the addition of
increasing volumes of insulating PCL will also negatively influence the
electrical properties of the material. Further studies are required to elucidate
the PCL:oligoEDOT ratio window in which both beneficial electroactivity and
enhanced material processability are maintained.
OligoEDOT Crosslinked Hydrogels
We next wanted to test whether our oligoEDOTs could be effectively used
as hydrogel crosslinkers, to demonstrate the versatility of our approach for
materials preparation. We therefore set out to undertake the gelation of
complementary polyethylene glycol (PEG) macromers (Figure 1c). While amine salts 9–12
were able to provide partial water solubility, upon buffering to physiological
pHs the oligomers quickly became insoluble at the concentrations required for
hydrogelation. Attempts to form hydrogels with 8-arm PEG succinimide esters
therefore yielded highly heterogeneous, mechanically weak gels encapsulating
areas of precipitated oligomer (Figure S5, Supporting Information). We therefore sought to
make use of the synthetic versatility of our amino-oligoEDOT series to introduce
water solubilizing functionalities.Thiol groups provide convenient reactive handles for hydrogelation via a
number of mechanisms, including nucleophilic Michael addition and radical
thiol-ene reactions.[ These
reactions often proceed with high specificity and rapid reaction kinetics,
leading to their widespread use in the biomaterial community. Moreover, it has
been widely shown that simple changes in gelation conditions such as pH and
temperature, or alterations to thiol or alkene chemistry, can dramatically
influence gel properties providing tunability.[ Amino-triEDOT 10 was therefore derivatized
with cysteine 13 in an attempt to both enhance water solubility and
increase hydrogelation efficiency (Figure S6, Supporting Information). We attempted gelation
with 8-arm PEG-maleimide, however water solubility continued to limit efficiency
and gel homogeneity. A Glu-Glu-Cys tripeptide 14 was therefore
ligated at the oligomer termini to provide additional charge at physiological pH
(Figure S6, Supporting
Information). Functionalized oligomer 15 was found to be
water soluble over a wide pH range, even at the high concentrations necessary
for hydrogelation. Mechanically stable hydrogels (5% by polymer weight) were
immediately formed upon mixing with 8-arm PEG-maleimide in PBS (Figure S5, Supporting
Information). A slight improvement in gel homogeneity could be
achieved by undertaking gelation at pH 6, due to an increase in gelation time
that allowed efficient mixing. Gel stability was high, as monitored through
leaching of the triEDOT crosslinker 15 out of the gel (Figure S7, Supporting
Information). Although a slight pH dependence on gel swelling ratio
(relative to the lyophilized gels) was observed, the effect was minimal and
likely due to the presence of the EEC tripeptide (Figure S8, Supporting
Information).The same peptide-modified oligomer strategy was then applied to the
formation of tetra- and penta-EDOT crosslinked gels. However, the increase in
oligomer length was found to be sufficient to reduce water solubility and
prevent gelation, with oligomer precipitation resulting instead. For this
reason, further hydrogel processing and characterization was not pursued, and we
instead chose to focus on the generation of fibrous oligoEDOT-based scaffolds as
described in subsequent sections.These results highlight the importance of overcoming the hydrophobicity
of extended π-systems to allow the synthesis of
electroactive hydrogels.[
Although this hydrophobicity IS limiting in the work presented here, the high
modularity of our oligoEDOT derivatization strategy offers a potential means to
address this difficulty. As demonstrated above, water solubilizing chains can be
easily ligated to oligomer building blocks. Furthermore, we have previously
demonstrated that our oligoEDOT synthesis strategy is applicable to alternative
dialkoxythiophene monomers.[ The use of reported water soluble EDOT derivatives,
bearing carboxyl or sulfonate group is particularly attractive.[ It is therefore likely that optimization of
this process will allow the future synthesis of tetra- and penta-oligomers with
sufficient solubility for gelation.
OligoEDOT-PCL Films Support Neural Stem Cell Growth and
Differentiation
To investigate the suitability of oligoEDOT-PCL films as substrates for
neural scaffolds, human iPSC-derived neural stem cells (NSCs) were seeded onto
spin-cast films.[ Seeded
scaffolds were cultured in fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) containing media to
promote NSC proliferation, or media without any mitogens to promote
differentiation (Basal Medium) (Figure
3a).[ After
7 days of culture, cells were stained for βIII-tubulin
(a marker of differentiated neurons), nestin (a marker of neuronal progenitors
and stem cells) and ki-67 (a proliferation marker). The addition of FGF2 media
showed that cells were proliferating and promoted the expression of ki-67 (Figure 3a). The total cell count on the
oligoEDOT-PCL films in basal and FGF2 media showed no significant difference to
the PCL scaffolds or glass controls (Figure
3b). Immunostaining revealed a significant increase in
βIII-tubulin positive cells cultured in basal media
on all substrates, with no significant difference being observed between NSCs
cultured on oligoEDOT-PCL films compared to the control groups (Figure 3c). Together, these results
demonstrate that oligoEDOT-PCL films are biocompatible and are a suitable
substrate for NSC differentiation and proliferation.
Figure 3
OligoEDOT-PCL scaffolds are biocompatible and support NSC proliferation and
differentiation.
a) Widefield fluorescence images of NSCs cultured on oligoEDOT-PCL, PCL, and ITO
glass at day 7 either in basal media (to promote differentiation) or FGF2 media
(to promote proliferation) (βIII-tubulin, green; nestin,
red; Ki67, magenta; DAPI, blue). Scale bar: 100 μm. b) Total cell count
of NSCs on substrates after 7 days. c) Neuronal differentiation on substrates as
evaluated by the percentage of βIII-tubulin+
cells over the total number of cells after 7 days. (Data shown as mean ∓
S.E.M. N = 2, n = 3 with a
minimum of 15 images analyzed for each condition. One-way ANOVA with post hoc
Tukey’s test was used. * represents p < 0.05 and
** represents p < 0.001).
Scaffold Preparation of OligoEDOT-PCL
Electrospun fibrous membranes have been used extensively in tissue
engineering applications, due to the architectural resemblance of micrometer
diameter fibers to the fibrils found in native extracellular matrix.[ To generate electroactive 3D
fibrous scaffolds from our oligoEDOT-PCL constructs, membranes were prepared
using solvent electrospinning, and MEW. Typically, these methods cannot be
applied directly to PEDOT due to its poor solubility and processability. Our
block co-polymer approach therefore offers an opportunity to address these
limitations and construct electroactive, fibrous, EDOT-based scaffolds for
neuronal culture. For solution electrospinning, tetraEDOT-PCL films were blended
at a 50% ratio with high molecular weight PCL, and polymer solutions were spun
at a 20% w/v concentration in a 9:1 mixture of CHCl3:
CH3OH, following our previously reported protocol.[ This resulted in the
deposition of pink colored fibrous mats after electrospinning (Figure S9, Supporting
Information). Fiber diameters were measured by scanning electron
microscopy (SEM), with an average diameter of ≈400 nm (Figure 4a). In order to assess the
suitability of the produced mats for neuronal culture, NSCs were seeded on
electrospun tetraEDOT-PCL scaffolds and cultured in basal medium to promote
differentiation for 24 h prior to fixing (Figure
4b). Immunostaining for βIII-tubulin and
nestin indicated that NSCs adhered to the membrane and underwent neuronal
differentiation (Figure S10,
Supporting Information). Interestingly, the oligoEDOT-PCL fibers were
found to be fluorescent in the red channel (Figure S10, Supporting
Information). We reasoned that this may be due to the shear forces or
exposure to high voltages during electrospinning, affecting the molecular
properties of the polymer. Current studies in our group are trying to elucidate
the physical processes that occur to cause this change in oligomer emission.
Figure 4
3D oligoEDOT-PCL scaffold fabrication.
a) SEM image of oligoEDOT-PCL scaffold created using solution electrospinning.
Scale bar: 20 m. b) NSC differentiation on solution electrospun scaffold after
24 h. Scale bar: 5 μm. c) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of
oligoEDOT-PCL lattice scaffold created using melt electrospinning writing (MEW).
Scale bar: 20 μm. d) Neural stem cell (NSC) differentiation on melt
electrospun 3D lattice scaffold after 24 h. Scale bar: 10 μm. e) Confocal
laser scanning microscopy image of NSCs on melt electrospun 3D lattice scaffold
for 24 h stained with βIII-tubulin (green), nestin (red)
and DAPI (blue). Scale bar: 20 μm.
Recent studies have reported that low pore size in electrospun scaffolds
can act as a barrier to cell penetration.[ Studying
cell behavior in complex 3D environments can also be challenging due to randomly
orientated fibers and heterogenous architectures.[ To investigate the suitability of
oligoEDOT-PCL for the production of scaffolds with defined microarchitectures,
we also used MEW to construct a 5 cm × 5 cm 3D lattice, which comprised
of 10 stacked layers, with an approximate spacing of 100 μm between grids
and a fiber diameter of 5 μm (Figure
4c). Interestingly, the scaffold color here was gold, further
suggesting that factors during the fabrication process, such as shear stress and
voltage, may have an effect on the molecular packing of the oligoEDOT-PCL
polymer (Figure S11,
Supporting Information).We examined cell adherence by seeding NSCs on oligoEDOT-PCL scaffolds
for 24 h in differentiation media, and SEM imaging revealed that NSCs adhered to
individual fibers in the scaffold (Figure
4d). Consistent with previous studies, neurites within our scaffolds
preferentially extended in the same directions as the fibers (Figure 4d,e).[
Electrical Stimulation Enhances Neurite Outgrowth
The key advantage of CP-based scaffolds for neural tissue engineering
are the opportunities they provide to electrically stimulate cells. Previous
studies have shown that switching the redox state of CPs by applying a voltage
can change neuronal behavior, including cell adherence, proliferation, and
differentiation, though the precise mechanism is not yet fully
understood.[ However, the poor mechanical properties of
conventional CPs can limit the ability to fabricate complex scaffolds and
sustain long term electrical stability. Our oligoEDOT platform provides an
exciting opportunity to overcome this challenge. To investigate the effects of
electrical stimulation on NSCs cultured on oligoEDOT-PCL films, we examined
neurite length and branching in NSCs after applying a pulsed direct current (DC)
(Figure 5a). To prepare the films,
tetraEDOT-PCL 16b films were deposited by spin coating directly on
to indium tin oxide (ITO) glass, a conductive substrate serving as the working
electrode. We chose to use PCL films spin coated on ITO glass as the
non-conductive control to eliminate possible contributions from electrochemical
processes in the cell culture medium. For the conductive control, bare ITO was
used, which has previously been used as a substrate to stimulate neural cells in
vitro and has been shown to evoke an electrical response in cultured
neurons.[ An
electrode cell assembly, constructed in-house, was used for in vitro NSC
stimulation (Figure S12,
Supporting Information), and NSCs were seeded in the chambers for 24
h prior to stimulation. A platinum wire counter electrode was placed inside the
cell culture medium in the micro chambers, at a distance of 1 cm from the
oligoEDOT-PCL films. To better mimic physiological conditions of neural network
activity, we used pulsed electrical stimulation. We also reasoned that this
would avoid a build-up of charge, thereby allowing long term electrical
stimulation, limiting any adverse effects on cell viability. Trains of 1 ms
pulses of 600 mV at 1 Hz were applied for 24 h, followed by fixing and
immunostaining of cells.
Figure 5
Effect of electrical stimulation (ES) on NSCs cultured on oligoEDOT-PCL
films.
a) Widefield fluorescence images of stimulated (left panel) and unstimulated
(right panel) (βIII-tubulin, green; nestin, red; DAPI,
blue). Scale bar: 100 μm. b) Mean neurite length of NSCs on substrates
with or without electrical stimulation. c) Neurite branching of NSCs on
substrates with or without electrical stimulation. (Data shown as mean ∓
S.E.M. N = 3, n = 2 with a
minimum of 12 images analyzed for each condition. Student’s
t-test was used. * represents p < 0.05).
We observed an increase in mean NSC neurite length following stimulation
on tetraEDOT-PCL films (142.1 ± 10.4 μm) compared to unstimulated
tetraEDOT-PCL films (111.4 ± 8.7 μm) (Figure 5b and Figure S13, Supporting Information). Similarly, neurite
length increased when NSCs were stimulated on ITO glass control substrates,
compared to the unstimulated group (140.1 ± 10.7 and 109.9 ± 8.06
μm respectively) (Figure 5b and
Figure S13, Supporting
Information). Surprisingly, neurite length was found to decrease upon
stimulation of NSCs on the PCL negative control group (60.5 ± 5.2 and
82.4 ± 6.45 μm) for stimulated and unstimulated groups
respectively, emphasizing the important role of the oligoEDOT block in promoting
neurite extension. Neurite branching was similarly increased on stimulated
oligoEDOT-PCL films and ITO control substrates, compared to their respective
unstimulated groups (Figure 5c).These results are consistent with previous studies which have reported
an increase in neurite outgrowth following electrical stimulation on
conventional CPs.[ Our substrates, exhibiting greatly improved
processability and more versatile material properties, therefore offer an
exciting alternative to pure CP scaffolds for stimulating neuronal cultures. It
has previously been proposed that cellular changes in response to electrical
stimulation are initiated at the cell surface, altering cell surface receptors
and protein adsorption, or modulating the growth cone morphology.[ In our study, it is also plausible that electrical
stimulation causes changes in the redox states of the EDOT oligomer, changing
the bulk properties and surface tension of the polymer, thereby causing changes
in NSC behavior. Further investigations into the origins of these effects are
currently underway. Critically, such studies are facilitated by the precisely
defined molecular structure provided by our oligoEDOT strategy.
Conclusion
In a search for electroactive materials suitable for the fabrication of
complex architectures in tissue engineering, we have developed a new electroactive
ABA block co-polymer, oligoEDOT-PCL. We have achieved a route to synergistically
apply electrical cues and create controlled topographies by combining the
electroactive properties of oligoEDOT structures, with the favorable processability
of PCL. The combination of these features is critical to achieving more complex
architectures for in vitro models of the developing brain, and we are currently
exploring the application of this material to develop highly defined scaffolds to
guide 3D neuronal growth. Future work should focus on harnessing the well-defined
molecular structure offered by our oligoEDOT synthesis strategy for precise control
over chemical functionalization, and the redox active properties for controlled
delivery of soluble growth factors and charged small molecules. This will provide
the opportunity to better mimic native tissue and provide spatio-temporally
controlled chemical guidance cues, such as patterning factors. Significantly, this
study demonstrates that oligoEDOT based biomaterials have potential for neural
tissue engineering, by providing a modular platform for biomaterial synthesis,
thereby improving processability and the potential to generate complex 3D
architectures for tissue engineering scaffolds.
Experimental Section
Details of oligoEDOT synthesis and their PCL co-polymers, electrical
stimulation device design and setup are included in the Supporting Information.Preparation of OligoEDOT-PCL FILMS: Thin films were
prepared by spin coating using oligoEDOT-PCL polymer solutions. Namely, diEDOT-PCL,
tetraEDOT-PCL, pentaEDOT-PCL and control PCL polymer solutions, including high
M
w PCL (70–90 kDa) and low
M
w PCL (24 kDa) were spin coated at 6 w/v %. Polymer
solutions were prepared in CHCl3, sonicated for 15 min and left overnight
to aid polymer dissolution. For UV–vis, microscope glass slides (10 mm
× 10 mm) were cut with a diamond tip. The glass slides were cleaned by
sonicating for 15 min each in acetone and isopropanol, dried under a nitrogen stream
and treated with oxygen plasma before spin coating. 100 μL of polymer
solution was spin coated on glass substrates for 20 s at 1500 rpm and placed in a
fume hood overnight.UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Absorbance spectra were
recorded with a Shimadzu UV-1601 UV/vis spectrophotometer, in the range between 300
and 900 nm. The spectra diEDOT-PCL, tetraEDOT-PCL and pentaEDOT-PCL films were
measured, and film samples were attached with blue tac to the outside of the cuvette
holder. In order to calculate the optical band gap energy, the longest absorption
wavelength λ
onset was used, according to the
following equation.[Cyclic Voltammetry: Cyclic voltammograms were conducted
using an Autolab PGSTAT101 potentiostat. Recordings were carried out using a
conventional three-electrode setup, using an isolated Ag/AgCl reference, platinum
counter electrode, and a glassy carbon working electrode. Films were deposited on
the glassy carbon electrode via drop casting. The measurements were carried out in
0.5 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate dissolved in propylene
carbonate as the supporting electrolyte. Samples were measured over the potential
range of −0.45 to 1.20 V at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1.SEM: OligoEDOT-PCL solution electrospun and MEW scaffolds
were mounted on a SEM pin mount, and sputter coated with a thin gold layer. Images
were obtained using a JSM 6010LA SEM (JEOL). NSCs on oligoEDOT-PCL scaffolds were
pre-fixed with 3.7% (w/v) paraformaldehyde and washed in 0.1 M sodium
cacodylate buffer for 5 min. NSCs were then fixed in 2.5% (w/v) glutaraldehyde in
0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 1 h at room temperature, and washed 2 }
5 min in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. For osmium tetroxide staining, a
solution of 1% (v/v) OsO4 was prepared in 0.1 M sodium
cacodylate buffer, and samples were incubated for 1 h. Samples were rinsed with
milli-Q water twice for 5 min. Samples were then serially dehydrated in graded
series of ethanol, as described, and treated with hexamethyldizilazane for 5 min.
Samples were then attached to SEM pin mount and coated with 24 nm chromium in a
sputter coater (Q150T S Quorum). Images were obtained using a Zeiss Sigma 300.AFM: AFM measurements were performed on an Agilent 5500
AFM. Topographical images were obtained in tapping mode using Micromasch HQ-NSC
cantilevers (nominal spring constant of 40 N m−1) at a resonant
frequency of 260 kHz. Images were taken at 40, 10, and 2 μm scale, and were
processed using Gwyddion software.KPFM: KPFM was used to obtain information about the surface
potential of the oligoEDOT-PCL films, and was performed using an Asylum MFP-3d
microscope. Images were obtained using Nanosensors PPP-EFM cantilevers (nominal
spring constant of 2.8 N m−1), coated in Pt/Ir with an applied DC
bias of 0.2 V. CPD on the sample was calculated using the following equation
where e is the electron charge.
OligoEDOT-PCL samples were spincoated on ITO glass.Cell Culture: Human episomal iPSC line (Epi-hiPSC) (Thermo
Fisher Scientific, U.K.), were maintained in feeder-free conditions on Matrigel
substrate with Essential 8 media (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and passaged when they
reached 80–90% confluence with EDTA solution (0.5 mM EDTA/PBS).
Neural induction was based on a previously published protocol.[ iPSCs were differentiated into
neuroectoderm when they reached 80–90% confluence by dual SMAD signaling
inhibition using neural induction medium [(Advanced DMEM/F-12 medium (Thermo Fisher
Scientific), 0.2% (v/v) B27 Supplement (Invitrogen), 1% (v/v) N2 supplement
(Invitrogen, U.K.), 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen), dorsomorphin (2
μM; Calbiochem, U.K.), 1% (v/v) GlutaMAX (Invitrogen)
supplemented with SB431542 (10 μM; Tocris, U.K.), and
N-acetylcysteine (1 mM; Sigma-Aldrich)] for 7 d, as previously
described.[ NSCs were
then passaged and plated on laminin-coated plates NSCR base medium[ (DMEM/F-12 medium (Thermo Fisher
Scientific), 1% (v/v) N2 supplement, 0.2% B27 supplement, 1% (v/v) nonessential
amino acids, 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin and 1% (v/v) GlutaMax solution (all
from Invitrogen), and B-27 medium (Neurobasal medium (Thermo fisher scientific), 2%
(v/v) B27 supplement, 1% (v/v) nonessential amino acids, 1% (v/v)
penicillin/streptomycin and 1% (v/v) GlutaMAX solution). After 3–5 days, iPSC
derived NSCs formed neural rosette structures, and NSCs were then maintained in F20
medium (NSCR neural maintenance base medium supplemented with 20 ng
mL−1 of FGF2 [PeproTech]) to promote expansion of NSCs. NSCs
were typically passaged every 5 days on matrigel coated plates, and the medium was
changed every 48 h, until cells reached 80–90% confluence.: TetraEDOT-PCL was blended with high molecular weight PCL
(M
w ≈ 75 000) at a 50:50 ratio and dissolved
at 6% (w/v) in chloroform. Polymer films were prepared by spin coating on cover
glass as described above and transferred into coverslip bottom 24 well plates
(ibidi). Silicone O-rings (10.77 mm diameter) were autoclaved, placed over glass
coverslips in the 24 well plates, followed by three washes in sterile PBS and
sterilized by cell culture-grade UV-light irradiation for 30 min. 500 μL of
matrigel (at a dilution of 1:120 in DMEM/F12 medium) was added to each well and
incubated for 30 min at 37°C in a cell culture incubator. For electrical
stimulation experiments, a custom-made cell culture device was designed using teflon
microchambers, which were autoclaved prior to use. Polymer films were prepared by
spin coating 6% (w/v) TetraEDOT-PCL on ITO glass electrodes, as described, and
assembled in the microchambers in a cell culture hood. The wells were washed three
times in sterile PBS and sterilized by cell culture-grade UV light irradiation for
30 min followed by 500 μL of matrigel (at a dilution of 1:120 in DMEM/F12
medium). NSCs were seeded on the polymer film samples at a density of 10 ×
104 per well using a dry plating method and left to incubate at
37°C for 20 min. For NSC proliferation and differentiation experiments, F20
media and 50:50 media was added, respectively, and medium was changed every 48 h.
For electrical stimulation experiments, 50:50 media was added to promote neuronal
differentiation.Electrical Stimulation of NSCs on OligoEDOT-PCL Films:
After 24 h of NSC seeding for cell attachment, a counter electrode platinum wire was
suspended into the microchamber well, parallel to the oligoEDOT-PCL film seeded with
NSCs. The platinum wire and ITO were connected to an eDaq potentiostat (EA163) and
trains of 1 ms electrical pulses of 600 mV at 1 Hz were applied for a period of 24
h. After stimulation, NSCs were fixed with 3.7% (v/v) paraformaldehyde for 15 min
followed by immunostaining.Immunostaining: For NSC proliferation and differentiation
experiments on oligoEDOT-PCL films, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 3.7%
(v/v) paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min at room temperature, and then
washed three times with sterile PBS. OligoEDOT-PCL films were permeabilized with
0.2% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 10 min, and then blocked with 3%
(v/v) goat serum (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min, followed with primary antibodies,
nestin (1:500; Millipore, U.K.), βIII-tubulin (1:1000;
Sigma-Aldrich), and Ki67 (1:1000; Abcam), followed with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) and
secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor dyes; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h. For
electrical stimulation experiments, cells were fixed, permeabilized and blocked as
described, followed with primary antibodies, nestin (1:500; Millipore, U.K.),
βIII-tubulin (1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich), followed with DAPI
(Sigma-Aldrich) and secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor dyes; Thermo Fisher
Scientific) for 1 h. For electrical stimulation experiments, stained samples on ITO
glass were mounted with coverslip slides with FluorSave Reagent (Millipore) and
stored at 4°C. Images of NSCs on polymer films were obtained with Inverted
Widefield Microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer), and Z stacks of
≈30 slices were obtained. Images on electrospun fibrous mats were acquired
with a Zeiss LSM 510 inverted confocal microscope.Imaging Analysis and Statistical Analysis: Images analysis
was performed with ImageJ software. Z stack images were deconvolved
using Huygens software. Neural stem cell (NSC) proliferation and differentiation was
analyzed by counting the percentage of
βIII-tubulin+ cells over the total number of
cells, using the cell counter plugin. Neurite outgrowth was analyzed using the
Neurite tracings plugin. Neurite outgrowth was analyzed by measuring individual
neurites for each soma, using the Neurite tracings plugin in Fiji. Neurite branching
was quantified using the cell counter plugin in Fiji. 3 or 4 random images were
taken for each sample. For statistical analysis all experiments were conducted at
least four times. Biocompatibility experiments were conducted with a minimum of 2
biological replicates and 3 technical replicates, and a minimum of 15 images were
analyzed for each condition. Neurite length and branching experiments were conducted
with a minimum of 3 biological replicates and 2 technical replicates, except where
replicates without quantifiable cells were excluded from the analysis. A minimum of
12 images were analyzed for each condition. One-way ANOVA with post hoc
Tukey’s test was used, and a p-value of <0.05 was
considered statistically significant.Solution Electrospinning: TetraEDOT-PCL was blended with
high molecular weight PCL (M
w ≈ 75 000 Da) at a
50:50 ratio and dissolved at 20% (w/v) in a 9:1 mixture of chloroform and methanol.
OligoEDOT-PCL polymer solutions were processed into fibrous scaffolds using a custom
build electrospinning device, as previous described.[ Scaffolds were spun at 12 kV, 20 μL
min−1 flow rate, with a distance of 15 cm between the needle
and collector plate. Fiber diameters were measured using ImageJ, based on SEM.MEW: TetraEDOT-PCL was blended with PCL
(M
w ≈ 75 000 Da) at a 50:50 ratio, by
dissolving in CHCl3, and precipitating in diethyl ether. The blended
polymer was loaded into a 3 cc polypropylene syringe (Nordson #7 012 074) and heated
overnight at 75°C in a vacuum oven to remove bubbles. A 23G needle (Nordson
#7 018 302) was installed, and the syringe was inserted into the spinneret. After
equilibrating for 30 min at 70°C, scaffolds were printed using a 10 kV
accelerating voltage, 10 mm collector distance, axis velocity of 1500 mm
min−1, feeding air pressure of 1.0 Bar, and heating
temperatures between 60 and 80°C. Printing was controlled by MACH 3 CNC
software (ARTSOFT, Livermore Falls, USA), and dimensions were specified by G-code.
Each scaffold consisted of 10 stacked layers.Scaffolds were detached from the collector plate using a drop of ethanol and
moved to a petri-dish. For cell culture experiments, scaffolds were sterilized by
cell culture-grade UV light irradiation for 30 min.
Supplementary Material
Supporting Information is available from the Wiley Online Library or from
the author.
Authors: Rylie A Green; Rachelle T Hassarati; Josef A Goding; Sungchul Baek; Nigel H Lovell; Penny J Martens; Laura A Poole-Warren Journal: Macromol Biosci Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 4.979
Authors: Marcel Alexander Heinrich; Wanjun Liu; Andrea Jimenez; Jingzhou Yang; Ali Akpek; Xiao Liu; Qingmeng Pi; Xuan Mu; Ning Hu; Raymond Michel Schiffelers; Jai Prakash; Jingwei Xie; Yu Shrike Zhang Journal: Small Date: 2019-04-29 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: Laleh Ghasemi-Mobarakeh; Molamma P Prabhakaran; Mohammad Morshed; Mohammad Hossein Nasr-Esfahani; Hossein Baharvand; Sahar Kiani; Salem S Al-Deyab; Seeram Ramakrishna Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 3.963
Authors: Erfan Soliman; Fabio Bianchi; James N Sleigh; Julian H George; M Zameel Cader; Zhanfeng Cui; Hua Ye Journal: Biotechnol Lett Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 2.461
Authors: Anthony R D'Amato; Devan L Puhl; Alexis M Ziemba; Christopher D L Johnson; Janneke Doedee; Jonathan Bao; Ryan J Gilbert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christopher M Madl; Bauer L LeSavage; Ruby E Dewi; Cong B Dinh; Ryan S Stowers; Margarita Khariton; Kyle J Lampe; Duong Nguyen; Ovijit Chaudhuri; Annika Enejder; Sarah C Heilshorn Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Timir Datta-Chaudhuri; Theodoros Zanos; Eric H Chang; Peder S Olofsson; Stephan Bickel; Chad Bouton; Daniel Grande; Loren Rieth; Cynthia Aranow; Ona Bloom; Ashesh D Mehta; Gene Civillico; Molly M Stevens; Eric Głowacki; Christopher Bettinger; Martin Schüettler; Chris Puleo; Robert Rennaker; Saroj Mohanta; Daniela Carnevale; Silvia V Conde; Bruno Bonaz; David Chernoff; Suraj Kapa; Magnus Berggren; Kip Ludwig; Stavros Zanos; Larry Miller; Doug Weber; Daniel Yoshor; Lawrence Steinman; Sangeeta S Chavan; Valentin A Pavlov; Yousef Al-Abed; Kevin J Tracey Journal: Bioelectron Med Date: 2021-05-24
Authors: Maradhana Agung Marsudi; Ridhola Tri Ariski; Arie Wibowo; Glen Cooper; Anggraini Barlian; Riska Rachmantyo; Paulo J D S Bartolo Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Eva Šafaříková; Jiří Ehlich; Stanislav Stříteský; Martin Vala; Martin Weiter; Jiří Pacherník; Lukáš Kubala; Jan Víteček Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 5.923