Literature DB >> 34035542

The association between guideline adherent radiographic imaging by chiropractic students and the diagnostic yield of clinically significant findings.

Shangavi Parthipan1, Chris Bowles2, Katie de Luca2, Hazel Jenkins2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiographic guidelines aim to increase the diagnostic yield of clinically relevant imaging findings whilst minimising risk. This study assessed the appropriateness of radiographic referrals made by student chiropractors and explored the association between guideline appropriate imaging and clinically significant radiographic findings.
METHODS: Radiographic referral and report findings (n=437) from 2018 were extracted from Macquarie University chiropractic clinics. Appropriateness of radiographic referrals was assessed according to current radiographic guidelines. Radiographic findings were assessed for clinical significance. The association between guideline appropriate radiographic referral and clinically significant radiographic findings was assessed using logistic regression analysis and odds ratios were estimated.
RESULTS: The proportion of guideline appropriate imaging was 55.8% (95%CI: 51.2-60.4). An association between guideline appropriate radiographs and clinically significant findings was found (OR: 2.2; 95%CI: 1.3-4.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of all radiographic referrals made by chiropractic students were guideline concordant. Guideline appropriate imaging was associated with an increase in clinically significant radiographic findings. © JCCA 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appropriate use; chiropractic; diagnostic yield; guidelines; radiographs

Year:  2021        PMID: 34035542      PMCID: PMC8128328     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc        ISSN: 0008-3194


  26 in total

1.  Imaging for low back pain: is clinical use consistent with guidelines? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hazel J Jenkins; Aron S Downie; Chris G Maher; Niamh A Moloney; John S Magnussen; Mark J Hancock
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  Non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Chris Maher; Martin Underwood; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Views on radiography use for patients with acute low back pain among chiropractors in an Ontario community.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Claire Bombardier; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Richard Glazier
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Prevalence of radiographic findings in individuals with chronic low back pain screened for a randomized controlled trial: secondary analysis and clinical implications.

Authors:  Robert D Vining; Eric Potocki; Ian McLean; Michael Seidman; A Paige Morgenthal; James Boysen; Christine Goertz
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Health care utilization and costs associated with adherence to clinical practice guidelines for early magnetic resonance imaging among workers with acute occupational low back pain.

Authors:  Janessa M Graves; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Jeffrey G Jarvik; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Imaging studies in patients with spinal pain: Practice audit evaluation of Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations.

Authors:  Robert Ferrari
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults--an evidence-based approach: introduction.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Cynthia Peterson; John A M Taylor
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Identifying factors likely to influence compliance with diagnostic imaging guideline recommendations for spine disorders among chiropractors in North America: a focus group study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Andrea M Patey; Jill J Francis; Anne E Sales; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Melissa Brouwers; Gaston Godin; Jan Hux; Marie Johnston; Louise Lemyre; Marie-Pascale Pomey; Anne Sales; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  Red flags to screen for malignancy and fracture in patients with low back pain: systematic review.

Authors:  Aron Downie; Christopher M Williams; Nicholas Henschke; Mark J Hancock; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Henrica C W de Vet; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Maurits W van Tulder; Bart W Koes; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-12-11

Review 10.  Current evidence for spinal X-ray use in the chiropractic profession: a narrative review.

Authors:  Hazel J Jenkins; Aron S Downie; Craig S Moore; Simon D French
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2018-11-21
View more
  2 in total

1.  Physical Therapists Are Routinely Performing the Requisite Skills to Directly Refer for Musculoskeletal Imaging: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Lance M Mabry; Richard Severin; Angela S Gisselman; Michael D Ross; Todd E Davenport; Brian A Young; Aaron P Keil; Don L Goss
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2022-08-13

2.  Adherence to spinal imaging guidelines and utilization of lumbar spine diagnostic imaging for low back pain at a Canadian Chiropractic College: a historical clinical cohort study.

Authors:  Ali Smith; Varsha Kumar; Jeffrey Cooley; Carlo Ammendolia; Joyce Lee; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Silvano Mior
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2022-09-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.