Facundo Scordo1, Sudeep Chandra2, Erin Suenaga2, Suzanne J Kelson2, Joshua Culpepper2,3, Lucia Scaff4, Flavia Tromboni2, Timothy J Caldwell2, Carina Seitz2, Juan E Fiorenza5,6, Craig E Williamson7, Steven Sadro8, Kevin C Rose9, Simon R Poulson10. 1. Global Water Center, Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA. scordo@agro.uba.ar. 2. Global Water Center, Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA. 3. Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, USA. 4. Global Water Futures, CFREF, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. 5. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET), Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura, (IFEVA), Buenos Aires, Argentina. 6. Facultad de Agronomía, Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 7. Department of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA. 8. Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. 9. Department of Biological Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, NY, USA. 10. Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
Abstract
Wildfire smoke often covers areas larger than the burned area, yet the impacts of smoke on nearby aquatic ecosystems are understudied. In the summer of 2018, wildfire smoke covered Castle Lake (California, USA) for 55 days. We quantified the influence of smoke on the lake by comparing the physics, chemistry, productivity, and animal ecology in the prior four years (2014-2017) to the smoke year (2018). Smoke reduced incident ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation by 31% and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) by 11%. Similarly, underwater UV-B and PAR decreased by 65 and 44%, respectively, and lake heat content decreased by 7%. While the nutrient limitation of primary production did not change, shallow production in the offshore habitat increased by 109%, likely due to a release from photoinhibition. In contrast, deep-water, primary production decreased and the deep-water peak in chlorophyll a did not develop, likely due to reduced PAR. Despite the structural changes in primary production, light, and temperature, we observed little significant change in zooplankton biomass, community composition, or migration pattern. Trout were absent from the littoral-benthic habitat during the smoke period. The duration and intensity of smoke influences light regimes, heat content, and productivity, with differing responses to consumers.
Wildfire smoke often covers areas larger than the burned area, yet the impacts of smoke on nearby aquatic ecosystems are understudied. In the summer of 2018, wildfire smoke covered Castle Lake (California, USA) for 55 days. We quantified the influence of smoke on the lake by comparing the physics, chemistry, productivity, and animal ecology in the prior four years (2014-2017) to the smoke year (2018). Smoke reduced incident ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation by 31% and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) by 11%. Similarly, underwater UV-B and PAR decreased by 65 and 44%, respectively, and lake heat content decreased by 7%. While the nutrient limitation of primary production did not change, shallow production in the offshore habitat increased by 109%, likely due to a release from photoinhibition. In contrast, deep-n class="Chemical">water, primary production decreased and the deep-water peak in chlorophyll a did not develop, likely due to reduced PAR. Despite the structural changes in primary production, light, and temperature, we observed little significant change in zooplankton biomass, community composition, or migration pattern. Trout were absent from the littoral-benthic habitat during the smoke period. The duration and intensity of smoke influences light regimes, heat content, and productivity, with differing responses to consumers.
Authors: Craig E Williamson; Patrick J Neale; Samuel Hylander; Kevin C Rose; Félix L Figueroa; Sharon A Robinson; Donat-P Häder; Sten-Åke Wängberg; Robert C Worrest Journal: Photochem Photobiol Sci Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Ian M McCullough; Kendra Spence Cheruvelil; Jean-François Lapierre; Noah R Lottig; Max A Moritz; Joseph Stachelek; Patricia A Soranno Journal: Glob Chang Biol Date: 2019-07-13 Impact factor: 10.863
Authors: Volker C Radeloff; David P Helmers; H Anu Kramer; Miranda H Mockrin; Patricia M Alexandre; Avi Bar-Massada; Van Butsic; Todd J Hawbaker; Sebastián Martinuzzi; Alexandra D Syphard; Susan I Stewart Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jennifer K Balch; Bethany A Bradley; John T Abatzoglou; R Chelsea Nagy; Emily J Fusco; Adam L Mahood Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: P W Barnes; T M Robson; P J Neale; C E Williamson; R G Zepp; S Madronich; S R Wilson; A L Andrady; A M Heikkilä; G H Bernhard; A F Bais; R E Neale; J F Bornman; M A K Jansen; A R Klekociuk; J Martinez-Abaigar; S A Robinson; Q-W Wang; A T Banaszak; D-P Häder; S Hylander; K C Rose; S-Å Wängberg; B Foereid; W-C Hou; R Ossola; N D Paul; J E Ukpebor; M P S Andersen; J Longstreth; T Schikowski; K R Solomon; B Sulzberger; L S Bruckman; K K Pandey; C C White; L Zhu; M Zhu; P J Aucamp; J B Liley; R L McKenzie; M Berwick; S N Byrne; L M Hollestein; R M Lucas; C M Olsen; L E Rhodes; S Yazar; A R Young Journal: Photochem Photobiol Sci Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 4.328