| Literature DB >> 34035295 |
Gregory A Wellenius1,2, Swapnil Vispute1, Valeria Espinosa1, Alex Fabrikant1, Thomas C Tsai3,4, Jonathan Hennessy1, Andrew Dai1, Brian Williams1, Krishna Gadepalli1, Adam Boulanger1, Adam Pearce1, Chaitanya Kamath1, Arran Schlosberg1, Catherine Bendebury1, Chinmoy Mandayam1, Charlotte Stanton1, Shailesh Bavadekar1, Christopher Pluntke1, Damien Desfontaines1,5, Benjamin H Jacobson4, Zan Armstrong1, Bryant Gipson1, Royce Wilson1, Andrew Widdowson1, Katherine Chou1, Andrew Oplinger1, Tomer Shekel1, Ashish K Jha4,6, Evgeniy Gabrilovich7.
Abstract
Social distancing remains an important strategy to combat the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. However, the impacts of specific state-level policies on mobility and subsequent COVID-19 case trajectories have not been completely quantified. Using anonymized and aggregated mobility data from opted-in Google users, we found that state-level emergency declarations resulted in a 9.9% reduction in time spent away from places of residence. Implementation of one or more social distancing policies resulted in an additional 24.5% reduction in mobility the following week, and subsequent shelter-in-place mandates yielded an additional 29.0% reduction. Decreases in mobility were associated with substantial reductions in case growth two to four weeks later. For example, a 10% reduction in mobility was associated with a 17.5% reduction in case growth two weeks later. Given the continued reliance on social distancing policies to limit the spread of COVID-19, these results may be helpful to public health officials trying to balance infection control with the economic and social consequences of these policies.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34035295 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23404-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919