Literature DB >> 34035092

Association of socioeconomic status with medical assistance in dying: a case-control analysis.

Donald A Redelmeier1,2, Kelvin Ng2,3, Deva Thiruchelvam2,4, Eldar Shafir5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Economic constraints are a common explanation of why patients with low socioeconomic status tend to experience less access to medical care. We tested whether the decreased care extends to medical assistance in dying in a healthcare system with no direct economic constraints.
DESIGN: Population-based case-control study of adults who died.
SETTING: Ontario, Canada, between 1 June 2016 and 1 June 2019. PATIENTS: Patients receiving palliative care under universal insurance with no user fees. EXPOSURE: Patient's socioeconomic status identified using standardised quintiles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Whether the patient received medical assistance in dying.
RESULTS: A total of 50 096 palliative care patients died, of whom 920 received medical assistance in dying (cases) and 49 176 did not receive medical assistance in dying (controls). Medical assistance in dying was less frequent for patients with low socioeconomic status (166 of 11 008=1.5%) than for patients with high socioeconomic status (227 of 9277=2.4%). This equalled a 39% decreased odds of receiving medical assistance in dying associated with low socioeconomic status (OR=0.61, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.75, p<0.001). The relative decrease was evident across diverse patient groups and after adjusting for age, sex, home location, malignancy diagnosis, healthcare utilisation and overall frailty. The findings also replicated in a subgroup analysis that matched patients on responsible physician, a sensitivity analysis based on a different socioeconomic measure of low-income status and a confirmation study using a randomised survey design.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low socioeconomic status are less likely to receive medical assistance in dying under universal health insurance. An awareness of this imbalance may help in understanding patient decisions in less extreme clinical settings. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult palliative care; cancer pain; health policy; primary care; rationing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34035092     DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  1 in total

1.  Being a safe place: a qualitative study exploring perceptions as to how a rural community hospice could respond to enactment of voluntary assisted dying legislation.

Authors:  Kirsten Auret; Terri Pikora; Kate Gersbach
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.234

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.