Susan Marie Viet1, Jill C Falman2, Lori S Merrill1, Elaine M Faustman3, David A Savitz4, Nancy Mervish5, Dana B Barr6, Lisa A Peterson7, Robert Wright5, David Balshaw8, Barbara O'Brien1. 1. Westat, Rockville, MD, USA. 2. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: faustman@uw.edu. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA. 5. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 6. Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, Atlanta, GA, USA. 7. University of Minnesota, Division of Environmental Health Sciences and Masonic Cancer Center, Minnesota, MN, USA. 8. Division of Extramural Research and Training, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Durham, NC, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Characterizing the complexity of environmental exposures in relation to human health is critical to advancing our understanding of health and disease throughout the life span. Extant cohort studies open the door for such investigations more rapidly and inexpensively than launching new cohort studies and the Human Health Exposure Analysis Resource (HHEAR) provides a resource for implementing life-stage exposure studies within existing study populations. Primary challenges to incorporation of environmental exposure assessment in health studies include: (1) lack of widespread knowledge of biospecimen and environmental sampling and storage requirements for environmental exposure assessment among investigators; (2) lack of availability of and access to laboratories capable of analyzing multiple environmental exposures throughout the life-course; and (3) studies lacking sufficient power to assess associations across life-stages. HHEAR includes a consortium of researchers with expertise in laboratory analyses, statistics and logistics to overcome these limitations and enable inclusion of exposomics in human health studies. OBJECTIVE: This manuscript describes the structure and strengths of implementing the harmonized HHEAR resource model, and our approaches to addressing challenges. We describe how HHEAR incorporates analyses of biospecimens and environmental samples and human health studies across the life span - serving as a model for incorporating environmental exposures into national and international research. We also present program successes to date. DISCUSSION: HHEAR provides a full-service laboratory and data analysis exposure assessment resource, linking scientific, life span, and toxicological consultation with both laboratory and data analysis expertise. HHEAR services are provided without cost but require NIH, NCI, NHLBI, or ECHO funding of the original cohort; internal HHEAR scientific review and approval of a brief application; and adherence to data sharing and publication policies. We describe the benefits of HHEAR's structure, collaborative framework and coordination across project investigators, analytical laboratories, biostatisticians and bioinformatics specialists; quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) including integrated sample management; and tools that have been developed to support the research (exposure information pages, ontology, new analytical methods, common QA/QC approach across laboratories, etc.). This foundation supports HHEAR's inclusion of new laboratory and statistical analysis methods and studies that are enhanced by including targeted analysis of specific exposures and untargeted analysis of chemicals associated with phenotypic endpoints in biological and environmental samples. CONCLUSION: HHEAR is an interdisciplinary team of toxicologists, epidemiologists, laboratory scientists, and data scientists across multiple institutions to address broad and complex questions that benefit from integrated laboratory and data analyses. HHEAR's processes, features, and tools include all life stages and analysis of biospecimens and environmental samples. They are available to the wider scientific community to augment studies by adding state of the art environmental analyses to be linked to human health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Characterizing the complexity of environmental exposures in relation to human health is critical to advancing our understanding of health and disease throughout the life span. Extant cohort studies open the door for such investigations more rapidly and inexpensively than launching new cohort studies and the Human Health Exposure Analysis Resource (HHEAR) provides a resource for implementing life-stage exposure studies within existing study populations. Primary challenges to incorporation of environmental exposure assessment in health studies include: (1) lack of widespread knowledge of biospecimen and environmental sampling and storage requirements for environmental exposure assessment among investigators; (2) lack of availability of and access to laboratories capable of analyzing multiple environmental exposures throughout the life-course; and (3) studies lacking sufficient power to assess associations across life-stages. HHEAR includes a consortium of researchers with expertise in laboratory analyses, statistics and logistics to overcome these limitations and enable inclusion of exposomics in human health studies. OBJECTIVE: This manuscript describes the structure and strengths of implementing the harmonized HHEAR resource model, and our approaches to addressing challenges. We describe how HHEAR incorporates analyses of biospecimens and environmental samples and human health studies across the life span - serving as a model for incorporating environmental exposures into national and international research. We also present program successes to date. DISCUSSION: HHEAR provides a full-service laboratory and data analysis exposure assessment resource, linking scientific, life span, and toxicological consultation with both laboratory and data analysis expertise. HHEAR services are provided without cost but require NIH, NCI, NHLBI, or ECHO funding of the original cohort; internal HHEAR scientific review and approval of a brief application; and adherence to data sharing and publication policies. We describe the benefits of HHEAR's structure, collaborative framework and coordination across project investigators, analytical laboratories, biostatisticians and bioinformatics specialists; quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) including integrated sample management; and tools that have been developed to support the research (exposure information pages, ontology, new analytical methods, common QA/QC approach across laboratories, etc.). This foundation supports HHEAR's inclusion of new laboratory and statistical analysis methods and studies that are enhanced by including targeted analysis of specific exposures and untargeted analysis of chemicals associated with phenotypic endpoints in biological and environmental samples. CONCLUSION: HHEAR is an interdisciplinary team of toxicologists, epidemiologists, laboratory scientists, and data scientists across multiple institutions to address broad and complex questions that benefit from integrated laboratory and data analyses. HHEAR's processes, features, and tools include all life stages and analysis of biospecimens and environmental samples. They are available to the wider scientific community to augment studies by adding state of the art environmental analyses to be linked to human health outcomes.
Authors: Ghalib A Bello; Manish Arora; Christine Austin; Megan K Horton; Robert O Wright; Chris Gennings Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Shelley H Liu; Jennifer F Bobb; Kyu Ha Lee; Chris Gennings; Birgit Claus Henn; David Bellinger; Christine Austin; Lourdes Schnaas; Martha M Tellez-Rojo; Howard Hu; Robert O Wright; Manish Arora; Brent A Coull Journal: Biostatistics Date: 2018-07-01 Impact factor: 5.899
Authors: Peter K Gilbertson; Susan Forrester; Linda Andrews; Kathleen McCann; Lydia Rogers; Christina Park; Jack Moye Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-03-05
Authors: Kristine K Dennis; Scott S Auerbach; David M Balshaw; Yuxia Cui; Margaret Daniele Fallin; Martyn T Smith; Avrum Spira; Susan Sumner; Gary W Miller Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: P Vineis; M Chadeau-Hyam; H Gmuender; J Gulliver; Z Herceg; J Kleinjans; M Kogevinas; S Kyrtopoulos; M Nieuwenhuijsen; D H Phillips; N Probst-Hensch; A Scalbert; R Vermeulen; C P Wild Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: Sara M Amolegbe; Danielle J Carlin; Heather F Henry; Michelle L Heacock; Brittany A Trottier; William A Suk Journal: Exp Biol Med (Maywood) Date: 2022-03-07
Authors: Erin Lebow-Skelley; Lynne Young; Yomi Noibi; Karla Blaginin; Margaret Hooker; Dana Williamson; Martha Scott Tomlinson; Michelle C Kegler; Melanie A Pearson Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-04-12
Authors: Stefanie A Busgang; Lance A Waller; Elena Colicino; Ralph D'Agostino; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Chris Gennings Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 4.614