Taro Oshikiri1, Hironobu Goto2, Manabu Horikawa2, Naoki Urakawa2, Hiroshi Hasegawa2, Shingo Kanaji2, Kimihiro Yamashita2, Takeru Matsuda3, Tetsu Nakamura2, Yoshihiro Kakeji2. 1. Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. oshikiri@med.kobe-u.ac.jp. 2. Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. 3. Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy is the principal treatment for localized esophageal cancer. Conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (C-MIE) in prone position has spread worldwide as it is less invasive. However, its efficacy remains controversial. Robot-assisted MIE (RAMIE) can have more advantages than C-MIE. Therefore, the current study aimed to validate whether RAMIE is associated with lower incidence of left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy compared with C-MIE in prone position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 404 patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent MIE (353 C-MIEs and 51 RAMIEs) in prone position at Kobe University between 2010 and 2020. Then, propensity score matching was performed, and results showed that 51 patients should be included in each group. Thereafter, the perioperative outcomes between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The RAMIE group had a significantly longer operative time than the C-MIE group (P < 0.0001). However, the number of lymph nodes resected along the left RLN was similar in both groups. Moreover, the incidence of left RLN palsy was significantly lower in the RAMIE group than in the C-MIE [Clavien-Dindo classification grade II; 0 (0%) versus 32 (9%), P = 0.022 in entire cohort, and 0 (0%) versus 5 (10%), P = 0.022 in matched cohort. Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group definitions type I; 8 (16%) versus 101 (29%), P = 0.041 in entire cohort and 8 (16%) versus 18 (35%) in matched cohort, P = 0.023]. CONCLUSION: RAMIE is superior to C-MIE in prone position in decreasing the incidence of left RLN palsy.
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy is the principal treatment for localized esophageal cancer. Conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (C-MIE) in prone position has spread worldwide as it is less invasive. However, its efficacy remains controversial. Robot-assisted MIE (RAMIE) can have more advantages than C-MIE. Therefore, the current study aimed to validate whether RAMIE is associated with lower incidence of left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy compared with C-MIE in prone position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 404 patients with esophageal carcinoma underwent MIE (353 C-MIEs and 51 RAMIEs) in prone position at Kobe University between 2010 and 2020. Then, propensity score matching was performed, and results showed that 51 patients should be included in each group. Thereafter, the perioperative outcomes between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: The RAMIE group had a significantly longer operative time than the C-MIE group (P < 0.0001). However, the number of lymph nodes resected along the left RLN was similar in both groups. Moreover, the incidence of left RLN palsy was significantly lower in the RAMIE group than in the C-MIE [Clavien-Dindo classification grade II; 0 (0%) versus 32 (9%), P = 0.022 in entire cohort, and 0 (0%) versus 5 (10%), P = 0.022 in matched cohort. Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group definitions type I; 8 (16%) versus 101 (29%), P = 0.041 in entire cohort and 8 (16%) versus 18 (35%) in matched cohort, P = 0.023]. CONCLUSION:RAMIE is superior to C-MIE in prone position in decreasing the incidence of left RLN palsy.