Literature DB >> 34032746

Secondary stone formation 8 weeks after percutaneous nephrolithotomy treatment: A case report.

Qiong Deng1,2, Hongliang Wang1, Yulin Lai1, Hui Liang1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This work reports a patient with recurrent renal calculi subjected to three surgeries in half a year to be in the same position, and the high-throughput sequencing data showed different species in the renal pus and urine samples, which suggested that partial renal infection or stone formation can be judged by the bacteria in urine. PATIENT CONCERNS: The female patient aged 43 years was referred to the authors' department on April 13, 2020, due to left waist pain and fever for 3 days. DIAGNOSIS: Kidney stones and hydronephrosis were determined by a urinary system computed tomography scan.
INTERVENTIONS: On April 20, 2020 and June 15, 2020, the patient was successfully treated with left percutaneous nephrolithotomy twice under general anesthesia. An investigation on the health and eating habits of the patient within 6 months was completed at the last admission. The components of the second renal calculus sample were analyzed with an infrared spectrum analyzer. The third renal stone (renal pus, triplicates) was subjected to microbial metagenome sequencing, and urine samples before and after surgery were subjected to 16S RNA sequencing by SEQHEALTH (Wuhan, China). OUTCOMES: After percutaneous nephrolithotomy, the left kidney stones were basically cleared, stone analysis revealed that the main components were calcium oxalate monohydrate, silica, and a small amount of calcium oxalate dehydrate. Although the urine samples exhibited differences, the renal pus and urine sample shared a single species.
CONCLUSION: It is not clear that the prospects of partial renal infection or stone formation can be judged by the bacteria in urine.
Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34032746      PMCID: PMC8154477          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


Introduction

Renal calculi, also known as nephrolithiasis or urolithiasis, have a prevalence of 1% to 15%, and their incidence is reported to be increasing worldwide.[ The development of kidney stones as a consequence of the exposure of renal epithelial cells to oxalate and calcium oxalate crystals can cause the blockage of the ureter, blood in the urine, vomiting, or painful urination, resulting in damage to the kidneys.[ Once afflicted, renal calculi tend to be recurrent at a rate of up to 50% in the majority of cases within 5 years after the first stone event.[

Case presentation

A 43-year-old woman was referred to the authors’ department on April 13, 2020, due to left waist pain and fever for 3 days. The patient underwent extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatment for left kidney stones >10 years ago, and left ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) 4 months before her visit. After admission, the patient underwent a urinary system computed tomography (CT) scan, which indicated multiple stones in the left kidney and hydronephrosis. The maximum cross-sectional size of the stones was about 13 × 32 mm (Fig. 1, left). On April 20, 2020, the patient was successfully treated with left percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia. Postoperative reexamination of the plain abdominal radiograph and CT scan revealed that the left kidney stones were basically cleared (Fig. 1, middle and right panels). Stone analysis revealed that the main components were calcium oxalate monohydrate, silica, and a small amount of calcium oxalate dehydrates.
Figure 1

Imaging data of the patient's first hospitalization in the authors’ department. Left panel, the computed tomography (CT) scan showed multiple stones in the left kidney and hydronephrosis after admission on April 13, 2020. Postoperative reexamination of the plain abdominal radiograph (Middle panel) and CT scan (Right Panel) revealed that the left kidney stones were basically cleared on April 22, 2020.

Imaging data of the patient's first hospitalization in the authors’ department. Left panel, the computed tomography (CT) scan showed multiple stones in the left kidney and hydronephrosis after admission on April 13, 2020. Postoperative reexamination of the plain abdominal radiograph (Middle panel) and CT scan (Right Panel) revealed that the left kidney stones were basically cleared on April 22, 2020. The patient returned to the hospital on June 10, 2020, for the removal of the ureteral stent, but a reexamination of the CT scan of the urinary system revealed that there were more left renal calyx stones than before (Fig. 2, left). Considering that the left kidney stones were infectious stones, they had relapsed in the short term. On June 15, 2020, left percutaneous nephrolithotomy was performed again under general anesthesia. Postoperative examination of the CT scan of the urinary system revealed that the left kidney stones were significantly reduced (Fig. 2, middle). The patient was discharged smoothly. A CT scan of the urinary system was examined again on August 23, 2020, and it was found that there was no significant change in the residual stones in the left kidney (Fig. 2, right).
Figure 2

The second percutaneous nephrolithotomy computed tomography (CT) images and postoperative reexamination results. Left panel, the CT scan of the urinary system on June 10, 2020 revealed that there were more left renal calyx stones than before (April 13, 2020). Middle panel postoperative examination of the CT scan of the urinary system revealed that the left kidney stones were significantly reduced on June 16, 2020. Right panel, on August 23, 2020, the CT scan shows that there was no significant change in the residual stones with the middle panel.

The second percutaneous nephrolithotomy computed tomography (CT) images and postoperative reexamination results. Left panel, the CT scan of the urinary system on June 10, 2020 revealed that there were more left renal calyx stones than before (April 13, 2020). Middle panel postoperative examination of the CT scan of the urinary system revealed that the left kidney stones were significantly reduced on June 16, 2020. Right panel, on August 23, 2020, the CT scan shows that there was no significant change in the residual stones with the middle panel.

Discussions

It is rare for a patient subjected to 3 surgeries in half a year to be in the same position. The patient was 43 years’ old with a BMI of 21.5 and confirmed Helicobacter pylori infection. The patient self-reported having no alcoholic beverage intake, a stable mood, a regular diet, low- intensity work, and sufficient rest, but less exercise and less daily water consumption (1000–1500 mL/day). A portion of the 16S RNA sequencing data is presented in Figure 3. The urine samples revealed differences in the numbers of ASVs/OTUs (Fig. 3A). Regarding the classes (Fig. 3B), the relative abundance of Betaproteobacteria appeared to be higher in the Urine_In group (urine collected at check-in, June 11, 2020), whereas the Urine_Out group (urine collected post-hospitalization, June 25, 2020) had higher percentages of Bacteroidia, Clostridia, Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, and so on. It has been demonstrated that drinking water contains a high diversity of Betaproteobacteria, whose presence may not be innocuous. Betaproteobacteria are ubiquitous in different habitats, and have the potential to resist antibiotics either due to intrinsic or acquired mechanisms, and possess different virulence factors.[ The increase of Bacteroidia and Clostridia in the Urine_Out group agreed with the results of Kikuchi's study, in which normal control rats were compared with rats with chronic kidney disease.[ Regarding the families (Fig. 3C), more Moraxellaceae, S24-7, and Sphingomonadaceae, but less Comamonadacear, were found in the Urine_Out group. The presence of Moraxellaceae is higher in patients with end-stage renal disease than in control patients, which suggests that it may be used as a negative marker.[ Bacteria belonging to the taxa Oxalobacteraceae, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, S24-7, Lactobacillus, and Clostridiales are known to harbor oxalate-degrading genes.[ Regarding the genera (Fig. 3D), more Auqabacterium was found in the Urine_In group, and more Acinetobacter was found in the Urine_Out group. Regarding the top 20 orders (Fig. 3E), the Urine_Out group had more Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, Pseudomonadales, and Sphingomonadales, and half of the orders in the Urine_In group was Burkholderiales. It has been reported that mice fed with high-salt diets, which induce gut dysbiosis and renal dysfunction, have an enriched abundance of Burkholderiales.[ Regarding the top 20 phyla (Fig. 3F), around two-thirds in the Urine_In group were Proteobacteria, and there were more Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes in the Urine_Out group. These data are consistent with a study that found that the proportions of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes were significantly higher in the healthy controls than in urolithiasis patients[; the bacterial flora in the urine of the patients had changed significantly after treatment. This may have been due to the use of antibiotics, or it may have been because the microflora tended to be more stable.
Figure 3

16S RNA sequencing results of the urine samples. (A) The numbers of ASVs/OTUs in the samples. The relative abundance of the classes (B), families (C), genera (D), top 20 orders (E), top 20 phyla (F) were presented.

16S RNA sequencing results of the urine samples. (A) The numbers of ASVs/OTUs in the samples. The relative abundance of the classes (B), families (C), genera (D), top 20 orders (E), top 20 phyla (F) were presented. Microbial metagenome sequencing was conducted on the renal pus samples collected at June 15, 2020 during the surgery, and the data are presented in Figure 4, as is the joint analysis with the 16S RNA results. Figure 4A shows that GT, GH, and CBM were the dominant classes and families in the renal pus. Chordata occupied half of the abundance, and Homo sapiens, Macaca tascicularis, and Macaca mulatta were the dominant species (Fig. 4B). As exhibited in Figure 4C, the Virulence Factors Database was used to predict the composition, structure, function, pathogenic mechanism, Virulence Island, sequence, and genomic information of the detected virulence factors. The Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins database was utilized, and the predicted proteins from triplicates were annotated, classified, and analyzed for protein evolution (Fig. 4D and F). As presented in Figure 4E, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthology (KO) annotation information from the KEGG database was obtained using DIAMOND to compare the gene set with the KEGG gene database (genes). The data suggested that 294 different types of microorganisms were found in the renal pus, and 158 species were found in the urine. However, surprisingly, the 2 types of samples share only 1 species (Fig. 4G). Previous studies have demonstrated that the outcomes of urine and renal stones are not always identical[; for example, in an American single-center study, Staphylococcus was identified as the most common bacteria in both urine and stones, whereas the bacterial spectrum of urine was not the same as that of stones.[
Figure 4

Microbial metagenome sequencing data of renal pus. (A) GT, GH, and CBM were the dominant classes and families in the renal pus. (B) Chordata, Homo sapiens, Macaca tascicularis, and Macaca mulatta were the dominant species. (C) The prediction of the detected virulence factors by Virulence Factors Database DB. (D and F) The predicted proteins from triplicates were annotated, classified, and analyzed for protein evolution. (E) The gene set with the KEGG gene database was compared using DIAMOND. (G) The renal pus and urine samples shared 1 species.

Microbial metagenome sequencing data of renal pus. (A) GT, GH, and CBM were the dominant classes and families in the renal pus. (B) Chordata, Homo sapiens, Macaca tascicularis, and Macaca mulatta were the dominant species. (C) The prediction of the detected virulence factors by Virulence Factors Database DB. (D and F) The predicted proteins from triplicates were annotated, classified, and analyzed for protein evolution. (E) The gene set with the KEGG gene database was compared using DIAMOND. (G) The renal pus and urine samples shared 1 species. Judging from the results of this case, patients with recurrent stones should pay more attention to anti infection treatment, it is not clear that the prospects of partial renal infection or stone formation can be judged by the bacteria in urine.

Author contributions

Q Deng analyzed and interpreted the patient data, prepared the manuscript. HL Wang was the physician in charge of the patient. YL Lai was a major contributor in revising the manuscript and an assistant in the surgery. H Liang was the chief physician and conceived the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Data curation: Yulin Lai. Investigation: Qiong deng. Methodology: Hongliang Wang. Supervision: Hui Liang. Writing – original draft: Qiong Deng, Yulin Lai. Writing – review & editing: Hui Liang.
  15 in total

1.  Clinical implication of routine stone culture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy--a prospective study.

Authors:  D Margel; Y Ehrlich; N Brown; D Lask; P M Livne; D A Lifshitz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Concordance of renal stone culture: PMUC, RPUC, RSC and post-PCNL sepsis-a non-randomized prospective observation cohort study.

Authors:  Annerleim Walton-Diaz; José Ignacio Vinay; Jaime Barahona; Pieter Daels; Mariano González; Juan Pablo Hidalgo; Cristian Palma; Pablo Díaz; Alfredo Domenech; Rodrigo Valenzuela; Fernando Marchant
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Medical management to prevent recurrent nephrolithiasis in adults: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Guideline.

Authors:  Howard A Fink; Timothy J Wilt; Keith E Eidman; Pranav S Garimella; Roderick MacDonald; Indulis R Rutks; Michelle Brasure; Robert L Kane; Jeannine Ouellette; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora.

Authors:  Nosratola D Vaziri; Jakk Wong; Madeleine Pahl; Yvette M Piceno; Jun Yuan; Todd Z DeSantis; Zhenmin Ni; Tien-Hung Nguyen; Gary L Andersen
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 5.  Medical management of renal stones.

Authors:  Monica S C Morgan; Margaret S Pearle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-03-14

6.  Midstream urine culture and sensitivity test is a poor predictor of infected urine proximal to the obstructing ureteral stone or infected stones: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Paramananthan Mariappan; Chong Wooi Loong
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Microbial Community Transplant Results in Increased and Long-Term Oxalate Degradation.

Authors:  Aaron W Miller; Kelly F Oakeson; Colin Dale; M Denise Dearing
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Genomic characterization of the uncultured Bacteroidales family S24-7 inhabiting the guts of homeothermic animals.

Authors:  Kate L Ormerod; David L A Wood; Nancy Lachner; Shaan L Gellatly; Joshua N Daly; Jeremy D Parsons; Cristiana G O Dal'Molin; Robin W Palfreyman; Lars K Nielsen; Matthew A Cooper; Mark Morrison; Philip M Hansbro; Philip Hugenholtz
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 14.650

9.  Enteric dysbiosis-linked gut barrier disruption triggers early renal injury induced by chronic high salt feeding in mice.

Authors:  Jingjuan Hu; Haihua Luo; Jieyan Wang; Wenli Tang; Junqi Lu; Shan Wu; Zhi Xiong; Guizhi Yang; Zhenguo Chen; Tian Lan; Hongwei Zhou; Jing Nie; Yong Jiang; Peng Chen
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 8.718

10.  The Relationship between Urinary Stones and Gut Microbiomeby 16S Sequencing.

Authors:  Chenhao Zhou; Kai Li; Lun Zhao; Wei Li; Zongbao Guo; Jingyao Xu; Xiaofei Qi; Hexing Yuan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.