Literature DB >> 34032000

New strategy for diagnosing abnormal glucose tolerance before 24 gestational weeks during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Yoshifumi Kasuga1, Yoshifumi Saisho2, Masumi Tamagawa1, Satoru Ikenoue1, Mamoru Tanaka1, Daigo Ochiai1.   

Abstract

The Japanese abnormal glucose tolerance before 24 gestational weeks diagnostic strategy in the evolving coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic published by the Japanese Society of Diabetes and Pregnancy.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34032000      PMCID: PMC8242597          DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Investig        ISSN: 2040-1116            Impact factor:   3.681


Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Currently, the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is on the rise, and cases have been increasing worldwide. The societies associated with gestational diabetes (GDM) in several countries have recommended new strategies to diagnose abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT; i.e., overt diabetes and GDM) after 24 gestational weeks (late GDM) during the evolving COVID‐19 pandemic . As early GDM has been screened and diagnosed for more than 20 years in Japan, and perinatal outcomes might be worse than those of late GDM . The Japanese Society of Diabetes and Pregnancy (JSDP) published the Japanese early AGT diagnostic strategy in the evolving COVID‐19 pandemic on 10 April 2020 . Although we evaluated the Japanese strategy to diagnose late GDM , we have not validated the Japanese early GDM diagnostic strategy in the evolving COVID‐19 pandemic. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the JSDP criteria to diagnose early AGT. We retrospectively investigated the records of a cohort of 304 women diagnosed with GDM before 24 gestational weeks using the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology criteria, who received perinatal care at Keio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, between January 2013 and December 2019. Those screening positive for GDM in the first trimester at our hospital were defined if one or more values reached or exceeded the following thresholds: random plasma glucose level≥95 mg/dL (5.3 mmol/L), glycated hemoglobin ≥5.9% (40 mmol/mol), glycoalbumin ≥15.8%, women with a history of GDM or macrosomia delivery, family history of type 2 diabetes or pre‐pregnancy body mass index ≥25 kg/m2. When the patients are positive for early GDM screening, they have to undergo an oral glucose tolerance test to diagnose GDM immediately. We re‐classified them using the Japanese early AGT diagnostic strategy in the evolving COVID‐19 pandemic published by the JSDP (Figure 1). We defined the patients who re‐classified as overt diabetes (COVID‐19‐ovDM) and early GDM (COVID‐19‐EGDM) as COVID‐19‐EAGT. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between COVID‐19‐EAGT and frequencies of insulin requirement, cesarean section or large for gestational age were evaluated using logistic regression analysis adjusted for maternal age ≥40 years, nulliparity and pregravid body mass index ≥25 kg/m2.
Figure 1

The Japanese abnormal glucose tolerance before 24 gestational weeks diagnostic strategy in the evolving coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic published by the Japanese Society of Diabetes and Pregnancy. *Glucose before meal is defined as fasting glucose or glucose >4 h after a meal. GDM, gestational diabetes; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.

The Japanese abnormal glucose tolerance before 24 gestational weeks diagnostic strategy in the evolving coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic published by the Japanese Society of Diabetes and Pregnancy. *Glucose before meal is defined as fasting glucose or glucose >4 h after a meal. GDM, gestational diabetes; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin. Of the 304 patients, they were re‐classified as COVID‐19‐ovDM (n = 3, 1%), COVID‐19‐EGDM (n = 38, 13%) and non‐early AGT (COVID‐19‐non‐EAGT; n = 263, 86%). According to the adjusted logistic regression analysis, the incidence of insulin requirement in the COVID‐19‐EAGT group was significantly higher than that in the COVID‐19‐non‐EAGT group (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.10–4.73, P < 0.05). However, the incidence of cesarean section (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.76–3.14, P = 0.23) and large for gestational age (OR 1.74, 95% CI 0.46–6.61, P = 0.41) was equal between the two groups. Although just 14% of participants were diagnosed with COVID‐19‐EAGT using the new JSDP criteria, they might also detect more severe GDM patients who required insulin treatment during pregnancy; however, as GDM is one of the most important perinatal complications not only for mothers, but also for neonates, the diagnostic criteria might have to be re‐considered to improve the diagnosis rate.
  3 in total

1.  The Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  H David McIntyre; Robert G Moses
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between women with early-onset and late-onset gestational diabetes in a retrospective multi-institutional study in Japan.

Authors:  Tomoka Usami; Maki Yokoyama; Megumi Ueno; Noriyuki Iwama; Norimasa Sagawa; Reo Kawano; Masako Waguri; Hiroshi Sameshima; Yuji Hiramatsu; Takashi Sugiyama
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.232

3.  A new diagnostic strategy for gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic for the Japanese population.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Kasuga; Yoshifumi Saisho; Satoru Ikenoue; Daigo Ochiai; Mamoru Tanaka
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 8.128

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.