Literature DB >> 34031850

Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and Micronutrient Deficiency in Bariatric Patients: Midterm Outcomes of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass/Mini Gastric Bypass.

Costantino Voglino1, Andrea Tirone2, Cristina Ciuoli3, Nicoletta Benenati3, Annalisa Bufano3, Federica Croce4, Ilaria Gaggelli2, Maria Laura Vuolo2, Simona Badalucco2, Giovanna Berardi5, Roberto Cuomo6, Maria Grazia Castagna3, Giuseppe Vuolo2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two of the most common bariatric procedures performed worldwide are Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Comparative data regarding nutritional status are lacking and no previous study focus on malnutrition according to a validated score.
METHODS: Retrospective data from a single institution were reviewed. Anthropometric variables and nutritional data were assessed. The primary aim was to analyze and compare the nutritional status before and 3 years after RYGB vs OAGB using the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score. The incidence of micronutrient deficiency and the remission of comorbidities in each group were defined as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients in each arm were enrolled. A 3-year mild malnutrition (CONUT score 2-3) was found in 38% and 37.05% in the RYGB and OAGB groups, respectively (p > 0.05). In terms of percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) and percentage of adjustable weight loss (%AWL), no differences were found between OAGB and RYGB groups. OAGB and RYGB patients had similar vitamin deficiencies. Anemia, hypoproteinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hypocalcemia were comparable between groups. At 3-year follow-up, total protein and albumin values were similar between arms while prealbumin deficit was more frequent after OAGB than after RYGB. The rate of type 2 diabetes (87.5% in OAGB and 92% in RYGB), arterial hypertension (51.6% in OAGB and 58.3% in RYGB), and dyslipidemia (69.7% in OAGB and 78.6% in RYGB) remission was not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative CONUT score, micronutrient deficiency, comorbidity remission, and improvement of anthropometric parameters 3 years postoperatively were comparable between RYGB and OAGB groups.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric bypass; Malnutrition; Metabolic surgery; Obesity; Obesity surgery; One anastomosis gastric bypass; Roux-en-Y; Vitamin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34031850     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05486-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  53 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass, Roux-en-Y: Preliminary Report of Five Cases.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  The mini-gastric bypass: experience with the first 1,274 cases.

Authors:  R Rutledge
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Controversy surrounding 'mini' gastric bypass.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar; William R J Carr; Shlok Balupuri; Peter K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  A prospective comparison of gastric and jejunoileal bypass procedures for morbid obesity.

Authors:  W O Griffen; V L Young; C C Stevenson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Cardiovascular Benefits and Lipid Profile Changes 5 Years After Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Study Between Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Costantino Voglino; Andrea Tirone; Cristina Ciuoli; Nicoletta Benenati; Barbara Paolini; Federica Croce; Ilaria Gaggelli; Maria Laura Vuolo; Roberto Cuomo; Luca Grimaldi; Giuseppe Vuolo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Gastric bypass in obesity.

Authors:  E E Mason; C Ito
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Mechanick; Adrienne Youdim; Daniel B Jones; W Timothy Garvey; Daniel L Hurley; M Molly McMahon; Leslie J Heinberg; Robert Kushner; Ted D Adams; Scott Shikora; John B Dixon; Stacy Brethauer
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  Optimizing results of gastric bypass.

Authors:  E E Mason; K J Printen; C E Hartford; W C Boyd
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Viktoria L Gloy; Matthias Briel; Deepak L Bhatt; Sangeeta R Kashyap; Philip R Schauer; Geltrude Mingrone; Heiner C Bucher; Alain J Nordmann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-10-22

10.  Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents.

Authors:  Emanuele Di Angelantonio; Shilpa Bhupathiraju; David Wormser; Pei Gao; Stephen Kaptoge; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Benjamin Cairns; Rachel Huxley; Chandra Jackson; Grace Joshy; Sarah Lewington; JoAnn Manson; Neil Murphy; Alpa Patel; Jonathan Samet; Mark Woodward; Wei Zheng; Maigen Zhou; Narinder Bansal; Aurelio Barricarte; Brian Carter; James Cerhan; George Smith; Xianghua Fang; Oscar Franco; Jane Green; Jim Halsey; Janet Hildebrand; Keum Jung; Rosemary Korda; Dale McLerran; Steven Moore; Linda O'Keeffe; Ellie Paige; Anna Ramond; Gillian Reeves; Betsy Rolland; Carlotta Sacerdote; Naveed Sattar; Eleni Sofianopoulou; June Stevens; Michael Thun; Hirotsugu Ueshima; Ling Yang; Young Yun; Peter Willeit; Emily Banks; Valerie Beral; Zhengming Chen; Susan Gapstur; Marc Gunter; Patricia Hartge; Sun Jee; Tai-Hing Lam; Richard Peto; John Potter; Walter Willett; Simon Thompson; John Danesh; Frank Hu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional Complications After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mohamed Tourky; Mohamed Issa; Mohamed A Salman; Ahmed Salman; Hossam El-Din Shaaban; Ahmed Safina; Abd Al-Kareem Elias; Ahmed Elewa; Khaled Noureldin; Ahmed Abdelrahman Mahmoud; Ahmed Dorra; Mohamed Farah; Mahmoud Gebril; Mujahid Gasemelseed Fadlallah Elhaj; Hesham Barbary
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-11

2.  Nutritional Status after Roux-En-Y (Rygb) and One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (Oagb) at 6-Month Follow-Up: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Paolo Gentileschi; Leandro Siragusa; Federica Alicata; Michela Campanelli; Chiara Bellantone; Tania Musca; Emanuela Bianciardi; Claudio Arcudi; Domenico Benavoli; Bruno Sensi
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 6.706

3.  Follow-up after bariatric surgery: is it time to tailor it? Analysis of early predictive factors of 3-year weight loss predictors of unsuccess in bariatric patients.

Authors:  Costantino Voglino; Simona Badalucco; Andrea Tirone; Cristina Ciuoli; Silvia Cantara; Nicoletta Benenati; Annalisa Bufano; Caterina Formichi; Federica Croce; Ilaria Gaggelli; Maria Laura Vuolo; Giuseppe Vuolo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-07-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.