| Literature DB >> 34031607 |
Jessilyn Dunn1,2,3,4,5, Lukasz Kidzinski6, Ryan Runge7,6, Daniel Witt8,9, Jennifer L Hicks6, Sophia Miryam Schüssler-Fiorenza Rose7,10,11, Xiao Li7,12, Amir Bahmani7, Scott L Delp6,13, Trevor Hastie14, Michael P Snyder15,16.
Abstract
Vital signs, including heart rate and body temperature, are useful in detecting or monitoring medical conditions, but are typically measured in the clinic and require follow-up laboratory testing for more definitive diagnoses. Here we examined whether vital signs as measured by consumer wearable devices (that is, continuously monitored heart rate, body temperature, electrodermal activity and movement) can predict clinical laboratory test results using machine learning models, including random forest and Lasso models. Our results demonstrate that vital sign data collected from wearables give a more consistent and precise depiction of resting heart rate than do measurements taken in the clinic. Vital sign data collected from wearables can also predict several clinical laboratory measurements with lower prediction error than predictions made using clinically obtained vital sign measurements. The length of time over which vital signs are monitored and the proximity of the monitoring period to the date of prediction play a critical role in the performance of the machine learning models. These results demonstrate the value of commercial wearable devices for continuous and longitudinal assessment of physiological measurements that today can be measured only with clinical laboratory tests.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34031607 PMCID: PMC8293303 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01339-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 53.440