Literature DB >> 34031251

Aging as a consequence of selection to reduce the environmental risk of dying.

Stig W Omholt1, Thomas B L Kirkwood2.   

Abstract

Each animal in the Darwinian theater is exposed to a number of abiotic and biotic risk factors causing mortality. Several of these risk factors are intimately associated with the act of energy acquisition as such and with the amount of reserve the organism has available from this acquisition for overcoming temporary distress. Because a considerable fraction of an individual's lifetime energy acquisition is spent on somatic maintenance, there is a close link between energy expenditure on somatic maintenance and mortality risk. Here, we show, by simple life-history theory reasoning backed up by empirical cohort survivorship data, how reduction of mortality risk might be achieved by restraining allocation to somatic maintenance, which enhances lifetime fitness but results in aging. Our results predict the ubiquitous presence of senescent individuals in a highly diverse group of natural animal populations, which may display constant, increasing, or decreasing mortality with age. This suggests that allocation to somatic maintenance is primarily tuned to expected life span by stabilizing selection and is not necessarily traded against reproductive effort or other traits. Due to this ubiquitous strategy of modulating the somatic maintenance budget so as to increase fitness under natural conditions, it follows that individuals kept in protected environments with very low environmental mortality risk will have their expected life span primarily defined by somatic damage accumulation mechanisms laid down by natural selection in the wild.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; evolution; life-history modeling; mortality risk; senescence

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34031251      PMCID: PMC8179188          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2102088118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  46 in total

1.  Effect of extrinsic mortality on the evolution of senescence in guppies.

Authors:  David N Reznick; Michael J Bryant; Derek Roff; Cameron K Ghalambor; Dionna E Ghalambor
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Slow life-history strategies are associated with negligible actuarial senescence in western Palaearctic salamanders.

Authors:  Hugo Cayuela; Kurtuluş Olgun; Claudio Angelini; Nazan Üzüm; Olivier Peyronel; Claude Miaud; Aziz Avcı; Jean-François Lemaitre; Benedikt R Schmidt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  SELECTION FOR DELAYED SENESCENCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Leo S Luckinbill; Robert Arking; Michael J Clare; William C Cirocco; Steven A Buck
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  LABORATORY EVOLUTION OF POSTPONED SENESCENCE IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Michael R Rose
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Predation risk shapes thermal physiology of a predaceous damselfly.

Authors:  Lauren E Culler; Mark A McPeek; Matthew P Ayres
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Mitochondrial DNA copy number and function decrease with age in the short-lived fish Nothobranchius furzeri.

Authors:  Nils Hartmann; Kathrin Reichwald; Ilka Wittig; Stefan Dröse; Sebastian Schmeisser; Claudia Lück; Christin Hahn; Michael Graf; Ulrike Gausmann; Eva Terzibasi; Alessandro Cellerino; Michael Ristow; Ulrich Brandt; Matthias Platzer; Christoph Englert
Journal:  Aging Cell       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 9.304

7.  The forms and fitness cost of senescence: age-specific recapture, survival, reproduction, and reproductive value in a wild bird population.

Authors:  Sandra Bouwhuis; Rémi Choquet; Ben C Sheldon; Simon Verhulst
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  The heritability of human longevity: a population-based study of 2872 Danish twin pairs born 1870-1900.

Authors:  A M Herskind; M McGue; N V Holm; T I Sørensen; B Harvald; J W Vaupel
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  The growth/predation risk trade-off: so what is the mechanism?

Authors:  Mark A McPeek
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Large differences in aging phenotype between strains of the short-lived annual fish Nothobranchius furzeri.

Authors:  Eva Terzibasi; Dario Riccardo Valenzano; Mauro Benedetti; Paola Roncaglia; Antonino Cattaneo; Luciano Domenici; Alessandro Cellerino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.