Literature DB >> 34030767

Shifts in allergy practice in a COVID-19 world: Implications of pre-COVID-19 national health care provider and patient surveys of treatments for nasal allergies.

Tonya Winders, Lawrence DuBuske, Don A Bukstein, Eli O Meltzer, Dana Wallace, Karen Rance.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most U.S. patient and health care provider surveys with regard to nasal allergy treatments were conducted before sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)-tablets and allergy immunotherapy (AIT) shared decision-making tools were available.
OBJECTIVE: Patient and health care provider surveys with regard to current perceptions of nasal allergy burden, symptoms, and treatments were conducted to compare with previous surveys and provide insight into the use of SLIT-tablets and AIT shared decision-making tools.
METHODS: From November-December 2019, adults (N = 510) diagnosed with nasal allergies and health care providers (N = 304) who treated nasal allergies in the United States completed surveys with regard to nasal allergy management.
RESULTS: Of the patient respondents, 42% reported that their symptoms were only somewhat controlled and 48% had avoided activities because of their nasal allergies. In all, 38% were using only over-the-counter (OTC) medications for treatment, and 42%, 7%, and 8% had ever received subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), sublingual allergy drops, or SLIT-tablets, respectively; 56% and 85% reported that they had never discussed SCIT or SLIT, respectively, with their health care provider. Of the health care provider respondents, 45%, 58%, and 20% were very likely to discuss OTC medications, SCIT, or SLIT, respectively. Allergists were more inclined to discuss SCIT with their patients than other health care providers (82% versus 33%, respectively). Most allergists (67%) and other health care providers (62%) reported that they did not use an AIT shared decision-making tool, primarily because of unawareness.
CONCLUSION: The patients with nasal allergies continued to report inadequate symptom control and activity impairment.SLIT-tablets and AIT shared decision-making tools were underused. In the coronavirus disease 2019 era, social distancing may limit office visits, which impacts SCIT administration and prompts increased use of telemedicine and a possible advantage for at-home-administered SLIT-tablets over SCIT.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34030767     DOI: 10.2500/aap.2021.42.210035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc        ISSN: 1088-5412            Impact factor:   2.587


  5 in total

1.  Preference for Immunotherapy with Tablets by People with Allergic Rhinitis.

Authors:  Mike Tankersley; Tonya Winders; Mark Aagren; Henrik Brandi; Mikkel Hasse Pedersen; Anne Sofie Ledgaard Loftager; Mette Bøgelund
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 2.711

2.  Eosinophilic esophagitis: from discovery to effective treatment.

Authors:  Joseph A Bellanti; Russell A Settipane
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.873

3.  COVID-19 pandemic impact on telehealth use and perceptions for atopic and respiratory disease: Survey results.

Authors:  Don A Bukstein; Jacqueline Eghrari-Sabet; Mary Hart; Tanisha Hill; Purvi Parikh; Tonya A Winders
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 2.873

4.  SARS-CoV-2 infection and the human immune system: A continuing journey of discovery.

Authors:  Joseph A Bellanti; Russell A Settipane
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.587

5.  Preference for sublingual immunotherapy with tablets in a Spanish population with allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  Mette Bøgelund; Ana Rosado Ingelmo; Jose María Ausín Ruiz; Adolfo Galán Vivó; Henrik Brandi; Mikkel Hasse Pedersen; Anne Sofie Ledgaard Loftager; Mark Aagren
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.871

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.