| Literature DB >> 34030135 |
Jing-Jing Xu1,2,3, Si Guo4,5,6, Rui Xue7, Lin Xiao1,2,3, Jun-Na Kou1,2,3, Yu-Qiong Liu1,2,3, Jun-Ya Han8, Jing-Jie Fu1, Na Wei1,2,3.
Abstract
Vascular dementia (VaD) is the second most common type of dementia worldwide. Although there are five FDA-approved drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD), none of them have been applied to treat VaD. Adalimumab is a TNF-α inhibitor that is used for the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. In a recent retrospective case-control study, the application of adalimumab for rheumatoid or psoriasis was shown to decrease the risk of AD. However, whether adalimumab can be used for the treatment of VaD is not clear. In this study, we used 2VO surgery to generate a VaD rat model and treated the rats with adalimumab or vehicle. We demonstrated that VaD rats treated with adalimumab exhibited significant improvements in memory. In addition, adalimumab treatment significantly alleviated neuronal loss in the hippocampi of VaD rats. Moreover, adalimumab significantly reduced microglial activation and reversed M1/M2 polarization in VaD rats. Furthermore, adalimumab treatment suppressed the activity of NF-κB, an important neuroinflammatory transcription factor. Finally, adalimumab displayed a protective role against oxidative stress in VaD rats. Our results indicate that adalimumab may be applied for the treatment of human patients with VaD.Entities:
Keywords: adalimumab; neuroinflammation; vascular dementia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34030135 PMCID: PMC8202885 DOI: 10.18632/aging.203009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging (Albany NY) ISSN: 1945-4589 Impact factor: 5.682
Figure 1Experimental diagram of the current study. A total of 40 rats were first acclimated for 2 weeks, and then physiological parameters were evaluated. After being subjected to 2VO or sham surgery, the rats were treated with adalimumab or vehicle for 9 weeks (four times a week). At the end of drug injection, physiological parameters were evaluated again. Then, the rats were subjected to the Morris water maze test and sacrificed after the behavior test. Samples were collected for biochemical and morphological experiments accordingly.
Both the 2VO surgery and adalimumab treatment didn’t alter the physiological parameters.
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |
| BW-Pre | 248.52 ± 13.15 | 243.30 ± 12.12 | 247.88 ± 13.79 | 243.78 ± 21.95 |
| BW-Post | 304.84 ± 17.09 | 302.68 ± 11.17 | 306.48 ± 10.14 | 306.09 ± 12.12 |
| RF | 84.10 ± 4.43 | 82.40 ± 4.60 | 81.80 ± 4.00 | 84.80 ± 3.58 |
| HR | 400.00 ± 13.30 | 404.60 ± 17.24 | 412.00 ± 11.27 | 409.10 ± 11.42 |
| Temp | 36.34 ± 0.33 | 36.70 ± 0.38 | 36.48 ± 0.25 | 36.54 ± 0.38 |
All the data are expressed as the mean ± S.D. Abbreviations: BW-Pre: body weight before the surgery; BW-Post: body weight after all the treatment; RF: respiratory frequency; HR: heart rate; Temp: body temperature; CCH: chronic cerebral hypoperfusion; ADA: Adalimumab treatment.
Figure 2ADA rescued memory impairments in CCH rats. (A) The escape latency to find the visible platform in the first 3 days. (B) Representative traces of rats given different treatments on day 5 of the training phase. (C) Escape latency to find the hidden platform on days 1-5 of the training phase. (D) The swimming speeds of the different groups in the training phase. (E) Representative traces of rats given different treatments in the probe trial. (F) The total amount of time spent in the target quadrant in the probe trial. (G) The number of platform region crossings in the probe trial. (H) The latency to first platform region crossing in the probe trial. All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 10). **p < 0.01 vs. the sham group; ##p < 0.01 vs. the CCH group.
Figure 3ADA rescued neuronal loss in CCH rats. (A) Representative images of Nissl staining for the different groups. Left: the whole hippocampus; Right: magnified images of the CA1, CA3 and DG regions. Bar = 100 μm for the left panel and 20 μm for the right panel. (B–D) Quantification of neuron number in the different groups in the CA1 (B), CA3 (C) and DG (D) regions. All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 8). **p < 0.01 vs. the sham group; ##p < 0.01 vs. the CCH group.
Figure 4ADA alleviated microglial activation in CCH rats. (A) Representative blots of Iba1 in the different groups. β-Actin was used as loading control. (B) Quantification of the optical intensity of Iba1 in (A). (C) mRNA expression of Iba1 in the different groups. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of Iba1 in the different groups. (E) Quantification of Iba1+ cells in (D). All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). **p < 0.01 vs. the sham group; ##p < 0.01 vs. the CCH group.
Figure 5ADA suppressed the expression of M1 markers. The expression of the M1 markers TNFα (A), IL-12 (B), IL-6 (C), IFNγ (D) and IL-1β (E) in the different groups was evaluated by ELISA kits. All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). **p < 0.01 vs. the sham group; ##p < 0.01 vs. the CCH group.
Figure 6ADA elevated the expression of M2 markers. (A–B) The expression of the M2 markers IL-10 (A) and IL-4 (B) was evaluated by ELISA kits. (C–E) The mRNA levels of Arg1 (C), YM1 (D) and TGF-β (E) were evaluated by Q-PCR. All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). **p < 0.01 vs. the sham group; ##p < 0.01 vs. the CCH group.
Figure 7ADA inhibited NF-κB signaling in CCH rats. (A) Representative blots for p-p65, p65 and STAT3 in the different groups are shown. β-Actin was used as loading control. (B–D) Quantification of the optical intensity of p-p65 (B), p65 (C) and STAT3 (D). (E) NF-κB activity was evaluated by ELISA kits. All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). **p < 0.01 vs. the sham group; ##p < 0.01 vs. the CCH group.
Figure 8ADA protected against oxidative stress in CCH rats. The levels of SOD (A), MDA (B), GSH-Px (C) and CAT (D) in the different groups were measured by the commercial kits. All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6). **p < 0.01 vs. the sham group; ##p < 0.01 vs. the CCH group.