Literature DB >> 34029233

Multitarget Stool RNA Test for Noninvasive Detection of Colorectal Neoplasias in a Multicenter, Prospective, and Retrospective Cohort.

Erica K Barnell1,2, Yiming Kang1, Andrew R Barnell1, Kimberly R Kruse1, Jared Fiske1, Zachary R Pittz1, Adnan R Khan3,4, Thomas A Huebner4,5, Faith L Holmes4, Malachi Griffith6,7,8,9, Obi L Griffith6,7,8,9, Aadel A Chaudhuri7,9,10, Elizabeth M Wurtzler1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Effective colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention and screening requires sensitive detection of all advanced neoplasias (CRC and advanced adenomas [AA]). However, existing noninvasive screening approaches cannot accurately detect adenomas with high sensitivity.
METHODS: Here, we describe a multifactor assay (RNA-FIT test) that combines 8 stool-derived eukaryotic RNA biomarkers, patient demographic information (smoking status), and a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) to sensitively detect advanced colorectal neoplasias and other non-advanced adenomas in a 1,305-patient, average-risk, prospective cohort. This cohort was supplemented with a 22-patient retrospective cohort consisting of stool samples obtained from patients diagnosed with AA or CRC before treatment or resection. Participants within these cohorts were evaluated with the RNA-FIT assay and an optical colonoscopy. RNA-FIT test results were compared with colonoscopy findings.
RESULTS: Model performance was assessed through 5-fold internal cross-validation of the training set (n = 939) and by using the model on a hold out testing set (n = 388). When used on the hold out testing set, the RNA-FIT test attained a 95% sensitivity for CRC (n = 22), 62% sensitivity for AA (n = 52), 25% sensitivity for other non-AA (n = 139), 80% specificity for hyperplastic polyps (n = 74), and 85% specificity for no findings on a colonoscopy (n = 101). DISCUSSION: The RNA-FIT assay demonstrated clinically relevant detection of all grades of colorectal neoplasia, including carcinomas, AAs, and ONAs. This assay could represent a noninvasive option to screen for both CRC and precancerous adenomas.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34029233      PMCID: PMC8148418          DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2155-384X            Impact factor:   4.488


  31 in total

1.  Performance Characteristics of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenomatous Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Rachel N Gruber; Timothy E Stump; Thomas W Emmett; Patrick O Monahan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Index for rating diagnostic tests.

Authors:  W J YOUDEN
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1950-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  E R Fearon; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Noninvasive Detection of High-Risk Adenomas Using Stool-Derived Eukaryotic RNA Sequences as Biomarkers.

Authors:  Erica K Barnell; Yiming Kang; Elizabeth M Wurtzler; Malachi Griffith; Aadel A Chaudhuri; Obi L Griffith
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840,149 screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Michael Hoffmeister; Christa Stegmaier; Gerhard Brenner; Lutz Altenhofen; Ulrike Haug
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Multi-Target Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Emerging Learning on Real-world Performance.

Authors:  Jason D Eckmann; Derek W Ebner; John B Kisiel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-01-21

7.  Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; David F Ransohoff; Steven H Itzkowitz; Theodore R Levin; Philip Lavin; Graham P Lidgard; David A Ahlquist; Barry M Berger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Plasma Septin9 versus fecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  David A Johnson; Robert L Barclay; Klaus Mergener; Gunter Weiss; Thomas König; Jürgen Beck; Nicholas T Potter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Roisin Bevan; Katharina Zimmermann-Fraedrich; Matthew D Rutter; Douglas Rex; Evelien Dekker; Thierry Ponchon; Michael Bretthauer; Jaroslaw Regula; Brian Saunders; Cesare Hassan; Michael J Bourke; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Multitarget stool DNA tests increases colorectal cancer screening among previously noncompliant Medicare patients.

Authors:  Mark Prince; Lynn Lester; Rupal Chiniwala; Barry Berger
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Interaction Between Epigenetic Changes, EMT, and Exosomes in Predicting Metastasis of Colorectal Cancers (CRC).

Authors:  Meiqi Yang; Mingjun Sun; Huijing Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.