Literature DB >> 34028553

Trends and Characteristics of Manufactured Cannabis Product and Cannabis Plant Product Exposures Reported to US Poison Control Centers, 2017-2019.

Julia A Dilley1, Janessa M Graves2, Ashley Brooks-Russell3, Jennifer M Whitehill4, Erica L Liebelt5,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34028553      PMCID: PMC8144922          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Legalization of adult use cannabis products has led to a consumer-driven marketplace. A growing share of retail cannabis sales are manufactured cannabis products,[1] which may contain higher levels of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) than unprocessed cannabis plant materials,[2] resulting in greater short-term effects (eg, cognitive and psychomotor impairment).[3] Public health concerns are emerging about these risks.[4] Our study objective was to assess recent patterns in reports of cannabis-related exposures by product type.

Methods

For this cross-sectional study, we accessed National Poison Data System data on cannabis exposures reported to US poison centers for January 2017 through December 2019. Cannabis product type codes were added to the system in 2016. We compared trends and characteristics of exposures for manufactured products that require processing of plant materials (eg, concentrates, edibles, vaporized liquids) and unprocessed plant materials (eg, flower) (eMethods in the Supplement). Two-sided P values <.05 were considered statistically significant. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cross-sectional studies. The institutional review board at Washington State University determined this study was exempt from review because it used deidentified data.

Results

Among the total 28 630 exposures, plant materials were the most commonly involved (18 763 exposures [65.5%]), followed by edibles (5537 [19.3%]), concentrates (2734 [9.6%]), vaporized liquids (1075 [3.8%]), and other manufactured products (521 [1.8%]) (Table).
Table.

Characteristics of Cannabis-Related Exposures Reported to US Poison Centers by Cannabis Product Type, January 2017 to December 2019

CharacteristicExposures, No. (%)P value
Specific manufactured productsGeneral product categories
Concentrates (n = 2734)Vaporized liquids (n = 1075)Edibles (n = 5537)Other (n = 521)Total manufactured (n = 9867)Plant materials (n = 18 763)
Total<.001
2017275 (10.1)33 (3.1)697 (12.6)89 (17.1)1094 (11.1)7146 (38.1)
20181002 (36.7)151 (14.1)1943 (35.1)174 (33.4)3270 (33.1)6011 (32.0)
20191457 (53.3)891 (82.9)2897 (52.3)258 (49.5)5503 (55.8)5606 (29.9)
Age group<.001
Children (<10 y)423 (16.6)77 (7.5)1905 (36.6)100 (20.3)2505 (27.0)1490 (8.4)
Youth (10-20 y)999 (39.1)551 (53.6)1561 (30.0)95 (19.3)3206 (34.5)7.369 (41.3)
Adults (≥21 y)1134 (44.4)400 (38.9)1746 (33.5)297 (60.4)3577 (38.5)8.984 (50.4)
Caller site<.001
Health care facility1375 (50.3)644 (59.9)2676 (48.3)248 (47.6)4943 (50.1)13 624 (72.6)
Residence1100 (40.2)373 (34.7)2230 (40.3)224 (43.0)3927 (39.8)3817 (20.3)
Other243 (8.9)52 (4.8)570 (10.3)47 (9.0)912 (9.2)1206 (6.4)
Unknown16 (0.6)6 (0.6)61 (1.1)2 (0.4)85 (0.9)115 (0.6)
Coingestants<.001
Cannabis only2138 (78.2)633 (58.9)4898 (88.5)371 (71.2)8040 (81.5)7207 (38.4)
Polysubstances596 (21.8)442 (41.1)639 (11.5)150 (28.8)1827 (18.5)11 556 (61.6)
Medical outcomea.001
Minor or less1369 (64.0)365 (57.7)3114 (63.6)274 (73.9)5122 (63.7)4404 (61.1)
Moderate or greater769 (36.0)268 (42.3)1784 (36.4)97 (26.2)2918 (36.3)2803 (38.9)
Legal status of state (2019 exposures only)b<.001
Not legal946 (65.4)692 (78.0)1328 (46.5)153 (59.3)3119 (57.3)3806 (68.7)
Rate per 100 0000.400.290.560.071.331.62
Adult use legal501 (34.6)195 (22.0)1528 (53.5)105 (40.7)2329 (42.8)1735 (31.3)
Rate per 100 0000.540.211.640.112.501.86
Quarterly slope coefficients (95% CI)c35.2 (22.5 to 47.8)27.8 (13.1 to 42.4)67.8 (58.8 to 76.8)4.7 (1.7 to 7.7)33.9 (17.7 to 50.0)−45.3 (−67.1 to −23.6)<.001d

Excludes cases with coingestants (ie, only includes cannabis exposures alone).

States with legal adult use in 2019 included: Alaska, California, Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maine, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, Washington State, and Washington, DC.[6]

Quarterly slope coefficients are from a linear regression of counts per quarter.

P value is for an interaction term between time and manufactured products group in a difference-in-difference model.

Excludes cases with coingestants (ie, only includes cannabis exposures alone). States with legal adult use in 2019 included: Alaska, California, Colorado, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maine, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, Washington State, and Washington, DC.[6] Quarterly slope coefficients are from a linear regression of counts per quarter. P value is for an interaction term between time and manufactured products group in a difference-in-difference model. Manufactured product exposure cases more often involved children: 2505 cases (27.0%) involved patients under 10 years old, compared with 1490 plant-based exposures (8.4%). Exposures to edibles had the greatest proportion of children (1905 exposures [36.6%]). More than half of all calls were made from a health care facility; manufactured product calls came from a residence nearly twice as often as plant-based exposure calls (3927 [39.8%] vs 3817 [20.3%]; P < .001). Most manufactured cannabis product exposures were for those products alone (8040 exposures [81.5%]). In contrast, most plant exposures (11 556 [61.6%]) also involved other agents (eg, alcohol, other drugs). Among exposures where only cannabis was involved, a slightly smaller percentage of manufactured product exposures overall (2918 [36.3%]) were associated with serious medical outcomes compared with plant-based exposures (2803 [38.9%]). Vaporized liquid exposures were most likely to have serious medical outcomes (268 [42.3%]). During 2019, population-based rates for manufactured cannabis product exposures overall and for most specific products were greater where adult cannabis use was legal. One exception was vaping: exposure calls per 100 000 population were 0.29 in nonlegal states (692 total exposures) and 0.21 in legal states (195 total exposures). Total cannabis exposures increased between 2017 and 2019. However, quarterly plant-related exposure reports declined over time, while manufactured product exposure reports increased overall and for each specific product (Figure).
Figure.

Quarterly Number of Cannabis-Related Poison Center Calls by Product Type, January 2017 to December 2019

Discussion

Our findings document that US poison centers are increasingly receiving calls about adverse events associated with exposures to manufactured cannabis products. Higher rates in legal states suggest that continued increases may be expected with adult cannabis use legalization in more states. Children may be at particular risk for exposure to edible products, such as cookies or candy. Although we did not see more serious health outcomes for manufactured product exposures compared with plant products overall, most cannabis plant exposures involved polysubstance use, whereas most cases for manufactured products were for those products alone, suggesting that exposure to manufactured products alone may be relatively more likely to generate adverse events. This is consistent with studies of acute health effects.[3] Manufactured products may present risks both because of THC levels and other processing ingredients. For example, vaporized liquid additive ingredients were implicated in a 2019 national lung injury (e-cigarette or vaping use–associated lung injury [EVALI]) outbreak.[5] Market factors may drive the industry to continue developing novel products, which could present additional health risks. Applying regulatory controls to market-driven innovations in potency and additives is key. Novice cannabis users are often advised to “start low, go slow”; this guidance may be equally applicable to regulating new retail cannabis markets and products. This study was limited by its data source. Poison centers provide useful information about specific product exposures and medical outcomes; however, data are self-reported and may underestimate the burden of cases. Ongoing monitoring of manufactured product–specific adverse events is recommended to understand public health concerns and effectiveness of regulations or harm reduction messaging.
  5 in total

1.  Variation in cannabis potency and prices in a newly legal market: evidence from 30 million cannabis sales in Washington state.

Authors:  Rosanna Smart; Jonathan P Caulkins; Beau Kilmer; Steven Davenport; Greg Midgette
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  How high: Differences in the developments of cannabis markets in two legalized states.

Authors:  Caislin L Firth; Steven Davenport; Rosanna Smart; Julia A Dilley
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2019-11-28

3.  Update: Characteristics of a Nationwide Outbreak of E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use-Associated Lung Injury - United States, August 2019-January 2020.

Authors:  Vikram P Krishnasamy; Benjamin D Hallowell; Jean Y Ko; Amy Board; Kathleen P Hartnett; Phillip P Salvatore; Melissa Danielson; Aaron Kite-Powell; Evelyn Twentyman; Lindsay Kim; Alissa Cyrus; Megan Wallace; Paul Melstrom; Brittani Haag; Brian A King; Peter Briss; Christopher M Jones; Lori A Pollack; Sascha Ellington
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Acute Effects of Smoked and Vaporized Cannabis in Healthy Adults Who Infrequently Use Cannabis: A Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Tory R Spindle; Edward J Cone; Nicolas J Schlienz; John M Mitchell; George E Bigelow; Ronald Flegel; Eugene Hayes; Ryan Vandrey
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-11-02

Review 5.  Cannabis Legalization and Acute Harm From High Potency Cannabis Products: A Narrative Review and Recommendations for Public Health.

Authors:  Justin Matheson; Bernard Le Foll
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.157

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Retail cannabis environment and adolescent use: The role of advertising and retailers near home and school.

Authors:  Caislin L Firth; Beatriz Carlini; Julia Dilley; Katarina Guttmannova; Anjum Hajat
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.931

2.  Comparison of hospital claims and poison center data to evaluate health impact of opioids, cannabis and synthetic cannabinoids.

Authors:  George Sam Wang; Christine Buttorff; Asa Wilks; Daniel Schwam; Gregory J Tung; Shireen Banerji; Richard C Dart; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Unintentional Pediatric Cannabis Exposures After Legalization of Recreational Cannabis in Canada.

Authors:  Daniel T Myran; Nathan Cantor; Yaron Finkelstein; Michael Pugliese; Astrid Guttmann; Rebecca Jesseman; Peter Tanuseputro
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-01-04

4.  Potency and Therapeutic THC and CBD Ratios: U.S. Cannabis Markets Overshoot.

Authors:  Sarah D Pennypacker; Katharine Cunnane; Mary Catherine Cash; E Alfonso Romero-Sandoval
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 5.988

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.