| Literature DB >> 34026471 |
Salihu S Musa1,2, Isa A Baba3, Abdullahi Yusuf4,5, Tukur A Sulaiman4,5, Aliyu I Aliyu5, Shi Zhao6,7, Daihai He1.
Abstract
Nigeria is second to South Africa with the highest reported cases of COVID-19 in sub-Saharan Africa. In this paper, we employ an SEIR-based compartmental model to study and analyze the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in Nigeria. The model incorporates different group of populations (that is, high- and- moderate risk populations) and is use to investigate the influence on each population on the overall transmission dynamics.The model, which is fitted well to the data, is qualitatively analyzed to evaluate the impacts of different schemes for controlstrategies. Mathematical analysis reveals that the model has two equilibria; i.e., disease-free equilibrium (DFE) which is local asymptotic stability (LAS) if the basic reproduction number ( R 0 ) is less than 1; and unstable for R 0 > 1 , and an endemic equilibrium (EE) which is globally asymptotic stability (LAS) whenever R 0 > 1 . Furthermore, we find that the model undergoes a phenomenon of backward bifurcation (BB, a coexistence of stable DFE and stable EE even if the R 0 < 1 ). We employ Partial Rank Correlation coefficients (PRCCs) for sensitivity analyses to evaluate the model's parameters. Our results highlight that proper surveillance, especially movement of individuals from high risk to moderate risk population, testing, as well as imposition of other NPIs measures are vital strategies for mitigating the COVID-19 epidemic in Nigeria. Besides, in the absence of an exact solution for the proposed model, we solve the model with the well-known ODE45 numerical solver and the effective numerical schemes such as Euler (EM), Runge-Kutta of order 2 (RK-2), and Runge-Kutta of order 4 (RK-4) in order to establish approximate solutions and to show the physical features of the model. It has been shown that these numerical schemes are very effective and efficient to establish superb approximate solutions for differential equations.Entities:
Keywords: Bifurcation; COVID-19; Pandemic; Reproduction number; Runge–Kutta
Year: 2021 PMID: 34026471 PMCID: PMC8131571 DOI: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104290
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Results Phys ISSN: 2211-3797 Impact factor: 4.476
Fig. 1The schematic diagram of the COVID-19 model with-high-and-moderate risk populations.
Interpretation of the state variables and parameters used for the Eqn (1).
| Total population of human | |
| Susceptible humans with moderate risk of COVID-19 infection | |
| Susceptible humans with high risk of COVID-19 infection | |
| Exposed humans | |
| Asymptomatically infected humans | |
| Symptomatically infected humans | |
| Recovered humans | |
| Recruitment rate of humans | |
| Fraction of newly recruited humans moving to | |
| Modification parameter for the increase of infectivity of | |
| Rate of movement from | |
| Rate of movement from | |
| Transmission/contact rate | |
| Relative infectiousness factor for asymptomatic humans | |
| Disease progression rate | |
| Fraction of infected humans moving to | |
| Recovery rates from | |
| Recovery rates from | |
| COVID-19 induced death rate | |
| Natural death rate | |
Baseline values of the parameters used for the model (1).
| 2500 (1000–5000) | ||
| 0.5 (0–1) | estimated by | |
| 1.3 (1–2) | estimated by | |
| 0.0714 (0.01–0.5) | assumed | |
| 0.0461 (0.01–0.5) | assumed | |
| 0.745 (0.599–1.68) | ||
| 0.5 (0.4–0.6) | ||
| 0.143 (0.05–0.275) | ||
| 0.86834 (0–1) | ||
| 1/7 (1/14–1/3) | ||
| 1/7 (1/30–1/3) | ||
| 0.015 (0.001–0.1) | ||
| 0.00005 (0.00003–0.00006) |
Fig. 2Fitting results of the model (1) to the reported number of COVID-19 cases in Nigeria from February 28 to August 25, 2020. In both panels, the green dots are the observed number of cases, and the red curves are the fitting results. The left panel shows the cumulative number of cases, and the right panel represents the daily number of new cases.
Fig. 3Result of the Partial Ranked Correlation coefficients (PRCCs) for the basic reproduction number and infection attack rate against the model’s parameters. The dots denotes the PRCCs estimates; and the bars represents the 95% confidence intervals (CI). The values and ranges of the model parameters are summarized in Table 2.
Fig. 4EM versus ODE45 function.
Fig. 5RK-2 versus ODE45 function.
Fig. 6RK-4 versus ODE45 function.
Fig. 7Overall comparison of the 3 approaches with ODE45 function.