| Literature DB >> 34026455 |
Seckin Akin1, Bitao Dong2, Lukas Pfeifer3, Yuhang Liu3, Michael Graetzel3, Anders Hagfeldt2.
Abstract
Despite rapid improvements in efficiency, long-term stability remains a challenge limiting the future up-scaling ofEntities:
Keywords: defect passivation; moisture resistant; perovskite solar cells; surface treatment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34026455 PMCID: PMC8132166 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202004593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1a) The typical device structure of PSCs in n–i–p architecture showing general formula for an organic ammonium‐based passivation agent. The molecular structures of some of the b) aliphatic and c) aromatic ammonium halides used in perovskite surface treatment.
Summary of the photovoltaic performance of n‐i‐p PSCs employing ammonium halide‐based molecular modulators
| Passivation agent | Device configuration |
|
| FF [%] | PCE [%] | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| FTO/c‐TiO2/MAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.08 | 16.56 | 62.0 | 11.5 |
[
|
|
| FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/Cs0.05(MA0.17FA0.83)Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.06 | 19.40 | 76.9 | 15.7 |
[
|
|
| FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05PbI2.5Br0.5/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.06 | 21.90 | 74.4 | 17.2 |
[
|
| Ethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/FA0.9Cs0.07MA0.03Pb(I0.92Br0.08)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.12 | 24.14 | 81.0 | 22.4 |
[
|
| Methylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/MAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | — | — | — | 17.2 |
[
|
|
| FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/(FAPbI3)0.85(MAPbBr3)0.15/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | — | — | — | 21.7 |
[
|
|
| FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/FAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.11 | 25.40 | 80.5 | 22.7 |
[
|
| Diethylammonium bromide | ITO/TiO | 1.06 | 21.93 | 78.7 | 18.3 |
[
|
| Hexylammonium iodide | FTO/SnO2/CsFAMAPb(I,Br)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Ag | 1.14 | 23.76 | 76.0 | 20.6 |
[
|
| Octylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/Cs0.05(MA0.17FA0.83)Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.02 | 19.37 | 76.7 | 15.2 |
[
|
| Tetra‐ethyl ammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/MAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Ag | 0.99 | 19.60 | 67.0 | 12.9 |
[
|
| Cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide | ITO/SnO2:CNDs/MAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.11 | 23.20 | 74.0 | 18.9 |
[
|
| 5‐Ammoniumvaleric acid iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/MAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.06 | 22.30 | 76.0 | 18.0 |
[
|
| 5‐Ammoniumvaleric acid iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/SnO2/MAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Ag | 1.11 | 22.92 | 79.0 | 20.1 |
[
|
| CF3(CF2)2CH2NH3I:formamidinium bromide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/Cs0.05MA0.1FA0.85PbI2.9Br0.1/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.15 | 25.26 | 79.0 | 22.8 |
[
|
| Adamantane | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/CsFAMAPb(I,Br)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.14 | 22.53 | 79.3 | 20.5 |
[
|
| 1‐Adamantylamine | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/CsFAMAPb(I,Br)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.16 | 22.57 | 80.4 | 20.9 |
[
|
| Protonated 1‐adamantylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/CsFAMAPb(I,Br)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.16 | 24.30 | 77.3 | 21.9 |
[
|
| Cyclohexylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/MAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 0.86 | 21.60 | 61.8 | 11.5 |
[
|
| Cyclohexylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/MA1‐
| 0.90 | 23.60 | 58.9 | 12.6 |
[
|
| Phenylethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/Cs0.1FA0.74MA0.13PbI2.48Br0.39/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.15 | 22.73 | 79.4 | 20.8 |
[
|
| Phenethylammonium iodide | ITO/SnO2/FA1−
| 1.18 | 25.20 | 78.4 | 23.3 |
[
|
| Phenethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/Cs0.05(FA0.83MA0.17)0.95Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.11 | 22.89 | 73.0 | 18.5 |
[
|
| Phenethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/MAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.11 | 20.53 | 75.0 | 16.8 |
[
|
| Phenethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/FAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.09 | 23.76 | 76.8 | 19.8 |
[
|
| 4‐Fluorophenethylamin iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/FAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.06 | 22.13 | 72.8 | 17.1 |
[
|
| Phenethylammonium iodide:formamidinium iodide (1:1) | FTO/c‐TiO2/FAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.14 | 24.20 | 76.6 | 21.2 |
[
|
| 4‐Trifluoromethyl phenethylammonium | ITO/ZnO/CsPbI2Br/CFPEAI/spiro‐OMeTAD/MoO3/Ag | 1.23 | 15.45 | 84.7 | 16.1 |
[
|
| 4‐Fluorophenylethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/FAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 0.95 | 24.10 | 67.7 | 15.5 |
[
|
| 1‐(Ammonium acetyl)pyrene | FTO/SnO2/(PEY2PbI4)0.02MAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.05 | 21.15 | 66.1 | 14.7 |
[
|
| 2‐Thiophenemethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/p‐SnO2/[(FAPbI3)0.87(MAPbBr3)0.13]0.92(CsPbI3)0.08/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.13 | 23.50 | 75.1 | 19.9 |
[
|
| 3‐Thiophenemethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/p‐SnO2/[(FAPbI3)0.87(MAPbBr3)0.13]0.92(CsPbI3)0.08/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.13 | 23.60 | 77.1 | 20.6 |
[
|
| 2‐Thiopheneethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/p‐SnO2/[(FAPbI3)0.87(MAPbBr3)0.13]0.92(CsPbI3)0.08/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.18 | 23.60 | 73.7 | 19.4 |
[
|
| 2‐Thiophenemethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/p‐SnO2/[(FAPbI3)0.87(MAPbBr3)0.13]0.92(CsPbI3)0.08/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.10 | 23.20 | 74.0 | 18.9 |
[
|
| Phenylethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/p‐SnO2/[(FAPbI3)0.87(MAPbBr3)0.13]0.92(CsPbI3)0.08/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.10 | 23.40 | 74.0 | 19.1 |
[
|
| Aniline | FTO/c‐TiO2/FAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 0.93 | 23.00 | 64.0 | 13.8 |
[
|
| Benzylamine | FTO/c‐TiO2/FAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.12 | 23.60 | 73.0 | 19.2 |
[
|
| Phenethylamine | FTO/c‐TiO2/FAPbI3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 0.95 | 23.60 | 59.0 | 13.3 |
[
|
| Phenylethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/Cs0.05FA0.85MA0.10Pb(I0.97Br0.03)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.12 | 25.01 | 80.9 | 22.7 |
[
|
| 4‐ | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/Cs0.05FA0.85MA0.10Pb(I0.97Br0.03)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.14 | 25.10 | 82.1 | 23.5 |
[
|
| 2‐(4‐Fluorophenyl)ethyl ammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/Cs0.1(FA0.83MA0.17)0.9Pb(I0.83Br0.17)3/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.13 | 22.80 | 80.0 | 20.5 |
[
|
| 2‐(2‐Fluorophenyl)ethylamine iodide | FTO/c‐SnO2/Cs0.05FA0.79MA0.16PbI2.49Br0.51/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.17 | 22.62 | 77.9 | 20.6 |
[
|
| 2‐(3‐Fluorophenyl)ethylamine iodide | FTO/c‐SnO2/Cs0.05FA0.79MA0.16PbI2.49Br0.51/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.16 | 22.75 | 76.8 | 20.5 |
[
|
| 2‐(4‐Fluorophenyl)ethylamine iodide | FTO/c‐SnO2/Cs0.05FA0.79MA0.16PbI2.49Br0.51/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.15 | 22.23 | 79.5 | 20.4 |
[
|
| Phenylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/FA0.9Cs0.1PbI2.9Br0.1/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 0.98 | 23.18 | 72.6 | 16.5 |
[
|
| Phenylmethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/FA0.9Cs0.1PbI2.9Br0.1/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.02 | 22.85 | 74.2 | 17.3 |
[
|
| Phenylethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/FA0.9Cs0.1PbI2.9Br0.1/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.04 | 23.16 | 75.5 | 18.1 |
[
|
| Pentafluoro‐phenylethylammonium iodide | FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/perovskite/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.10 | 25.80 | 78.4 | 22.2 |
[
|
|
| ITO/SnO2:Li/(FAPbI3)0.97(MAPbBr3)0.03/spiro‐OMeTAD/Au | 1.09 | 23.13 | 72.0 | 18.2 |
[
|
Figure 2a) Schematic illustration of the crystal structures of methylammonium lead iodide and a layered perovskite (LPK), forming the junction. Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. b) PL decay measurement of different perovskite films (10 mm BAI/OAI for 3D/2D perovskites). Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry. c) J–V characteristics of solar cells fabricated from various perovskite layers (10 mm BAI/OAI for 3D/2D perovskites), recorded in the reverse scanning direction with a sweeping rate of 100 mV s−1. Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry. d) Top view of the optimized structure of PA2PbI4. White: H, blue: N, light gray: C, dark gray: Pb, red: I. The lattice parameters for the unit cell of PA2PbI4 are a = 11.616 Å; b = 6.150 Å; c = 7.514 Å; α = 105.557; β = 110.664°; and γ = 97.809°. Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society. High‐resolution XPS for the C 1s peak in (PA)2 FA0.79MA0.16Cs0.05Pb1+ I2.5+4 Br0.5‐mixed perovskite films with e) 0% and f) 5% PA+ additive. Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Figure 3a) Schematic representation of the 1D/3D heterostructure evidenced by solid‐state NMR proximity measurements. b) A comparison of operational stability of control and treated perovskite devices. The devices were measured under a nitrogen environment at room temperature under constant illumination (LED source, ≈1 Sun) at a maximum power point for 550 h. a,b) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Springer Nature. c) Average CPD values as a function of bias voltage applied to the tip for the reference and MP50 treatment samples measured in dark. Spatial CPD maps of the d) reference and e) MP50‐treated samples. c–e) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Wiley‐VCH.
Figure 4a) Chemical structure of IBA+ and schematic illustration of pure 2D‐IBA2PbI4 perovskite. GIWAXS data of b) FAPbI3 film c) FAPbI3/2D IBA2FAPb2I7. Angle of incidence was 0.148. d) Radially integrated GIWAXS data from (b,c). e) J–V curves of the best‐performing devices. The inset shows the MPP tracking data of PSCs based on bare FAPbI3 and FAPbI3/IBA2FAPb2I7 perovskites. f) Ageing results of PSCs based on bare FAPbI3 (black or blue dotted line) FAPbI3/IBA2FAPb2I7 perovskites (red dotted line). Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Wiley‐VCH.
Figure 5Top view of SEM images of a) pristine film and b) 5 mg mL−1 DABr solution treated perovskite films. c) X‐ray diffraction patterns of pristine and DABr‐treated perovskite films. The inset shows that the three diffraction peaks of the passivated perovskite hybrid at 7.06°, 7.45°, and 8.18° mainly arose from DA2PbI4, and the weak diffraction peak at 7.45° belongs to DA2PbBr4. a–c) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Elsevier. d) Fabrication process of the 2D perovskite based on HAI in the 2D/3D stacking structure. e) The time‐resolved photoluminescence (TRPL) decay curves of 3D, 3D + BAI, and 3D + HAI perovskite films samples. d,e) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Figure 6a) Photovoltaic performance of PSCs fabricated after the perovskite layers are exposed to different humidity levels for 24 h. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the measured parameters (minimum five devices). All J–V measurements were operated under AM 1.5 G irradiation at a reverse scan rate of 0.15 V s−1. b) Side views of the optimized geometries of the (100) surfaces of MA, TMA, and TEA samples. Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Springer Nature.
Figure 7a) Cross‐sectional TEM image of the perovskite cell (treated with CTABr). b) Humidity stability of the devices tested at 10–20°C under 75 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) without any encapsulation. The water contact angle for c) the MAPbI3 film and d) the MAPbI3 film treated with CTABr. a–d) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry. e) J–V results of the champion cells with different perovskite light absorbers under simulated AM 1.5 radiation. Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Wiley‐VCH. f) SEM images of MAPbI3 and AVAI‐MAPbI3 films. Scale bars, 1 µm. g) GIWAXS data from AVAI‐MAPbI3 films. The inset shows the integrated intensity profile for AVAI‐MAPbI3 films. f,g) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Figure 8a) TRPL spectra of perovskite films before and after passivation by AD and ADA molecules with optimum concentration of 1.5 mg mL−1 in CB using the SC method. b) Chemical structure of adamantane (AD) and 1‐adamantylamine (ADA) used for passivation of perovskite film. a,b) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Wiley‐VCH. c) Chemical structure of ADAHX. d) Optimized geometry (DFT B3LYP/6‐31G(d)) of ADAH+. e) 14N solid‐state MAS NMR spectra at 21.1 T, 298 K, and 5 kHz MAS of i) α‐FAPbI3 and ii) α‐FAPbI3 treated with ADAHI. 13C CP solid‐state MAS NMR spectra at 21.1 T, 100 K, and 12 kHz MAS of iii) α‐FAPbI3 and iv) α‐FAPbI3 treated with ADAHI (the FA spectral region), as well as v) neat ADAHI powder and vi) α‐FAPbI3 treated with ADAHI (the ADAHI spectral region). The red arrow indicates a new FA environment present after treatment. The asterisk indicates a spinning sideband of the FA signal. α‐FAPbI3 was prepared mechanochemically and the treated samples contain 7 mol% of ADAHI. c–e) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Figure 9a) Schematic structure of the different barriers (R‐NH3): phenethylammonium iodide (PEA), benzylammonium iodide (BA), and cyclohexylammonium iodide (CHMA). b) Solar cell architecture used in this study. c) HR‐SEM cross section of the solar cell with the 2D/3D (n = 40) perovskite, where the CHMA is the barrier molecule. d) Stability measurements of solar cells based on 2D/3D perovskites (n = 40) of the different barriers and of the 3D perovskite under 1 sun illumination, 30−50% humidity, and for 205 h. e) Stability measurements of solar cells based on 2D/3D mixed cation perovskites (n = 40) of the different barriers and of the 3D mixed cation perovskite under 1 sun illumination, 30−50% humidity, and for 205 h. Inset shows the schematic illustration of distorted layered mixed cation MA + Cs perovskite with CHMA as a spacer. f) Photo of the solar cell before the stability measurements (top). Photo of the solar cell based on a mixed cation (Cs + MA) and the corresponding spacer after the stability measurements (middle). Photo of the solar cell based on the corresponding spacer after the stability measurements (bottom). Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.
Figure 10a) Top‐view SEM images of the CFMPIB film (left) and the L‐CFM/P film (right). b) Energy band diagram of the L‐CFM/P device and description of how the 2D perovskite capping layer improved the PCE. c) J–V curves and hysteresis of PSCs at a scan rate of 25 mV s−1. a–c) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Elsevier. d) The device structure adopted in this study. PEAI is used for post‐treatment of the perovskite surface. e) Possible passivation mechanism of the PEAI layer for the perovskite film. f) TRPL of the perovskite films with PEAI treatment under different conditions. d–f) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Springer Nature.
Figure 11a,b) AFM image and the corresponding CPD distribution image of the 3D perovskite film. c,d) AFM image and the corresponding CPD distribution image of the 2D‐3D perovskite film. e,f) Schematic illustration of the energy band alignment regarding Fermi level splitting in the dark and under light illumination. Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Wiley‐VCH.
Figure 12a) The chemical structures of aniline, benzylamine, and phenethylamine. b) Moisture stability of unmodified FAPbI3 (black line) and BA‐FAPbI3 (red and blue lines) devices under air exposure (50 ± 5 RH%). “Half cells” means that only the BA‐FAPbI3 films on the TiO2/FTO substrates were exposed to air and that the spiro‐OMeTAD and Au layers were deposited onto the films before the J–V measurement. c) DFT simulation of one water molecule adsorption on the A‐FAPbI3, BA‐FAPbI3, and PA‐FAPbI3 surface. Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Wiley‐VCH.
Figure 13a) Chemical structures of PEAI and tBBAI. b) Structures of a tBBAI‐passivated PSC. c) PLQY for the layer structure glass/FTO/c‐TiO2/mp‐TiO2/perovskite/interface layer with HTL. d) Stabilized V OC and quasi‐Fermi level splitting Δ EF/q for the layer structure glass/FTO/compact‐TiO2/mesoscopic‐TiO2/perovskite/interface layer/HTL. The stabilized V OC after 30 min light soaking is also shown. e) MPP tracking of the PSCs within the first 330 s under ambient air. Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Wiley‐VCH.
Figure 14Cross‐sectional SEM images of a) unmodified 3D perovskite) b) (FPEA)2PbI4 modified perovskite. Scale bar is 400 nm; LSCM images show the emission between 700 and 760 nm (red color for perovskite) and emission between 500 and 550 nm (green color for 2D (FPEA)2PbI4). Color saturation scales with emission intensity. Excitation laser wavelength at 488 nm. c) J–V curves, and (inset) stabilized PCEs with current density at a maximum power point (modified: 0.96 V; control: 0.95 V) of the best performing devices for 200 s. a–c) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Wiley‐VCH. EPS images for d) pFPEAI, e) mFPEAI, and f) oFPEAI. EPS The direction and intensity of molecular dipole moments for g) pFPEAI, h) mFPEAI, and i) oFPEAI as indicated by the length of the arrows. j) Perovskite devices with PCE and V OC published in recent years (solid dots represent triple‐cation perovskites; hollow dots represent all other types perovskites. d–j) Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, Wiley‐VCH.
Figure 15a) Schematic illustration of the 2D treatment of 3D perovskite to form the 3D/2D bilayer perovskite with the structural representation of the FEA+ cation and the corresponding optimized geometry [density functional theory (DFT) calculation on B3LYP/6‐31G(d) level of theory]. b) Structures of pure 3D perovskite and c) pure 2D perovskite. d) Cross‐sectional SEM of 3D/2D PSC. e) Fluorine XPS in‐depth profiling of 3D/2D bilayer perovskite. f) J‒V curves of a 3D PSC and a 3D/2D PSC, with inset showing MPP tracking. Reproduced with permission under the terms of the CC BY‐NC 4.0 license.[ ] Copyright 2020, The Authors, some rights reserved, exclusive license American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Figure 16a) Structure of the surface passivation molecules. b) Cross‐sectional SEM image of the full device. c) J–V characterization for control and passivated PSCs. The J–V curves are measured under standard conditions with a scan rate of 0.1 V s−1. d) The band alignment diagram of the PSCs used in this study. e) PL spectra for the 0 to 20 mm TPA‐PEABr‐passivated perovskite/HTM films. f) Mott−Schottky plots of the control and 10 mm TPAPEABr‐passivated PSCs. The data are collected at 5000 Hz. Reproduced with permission.[ ] Copyright 2020, American Chemical Society.