| Literature DB >> 34026284 |
Lanxiang Liu1,2,3, Haiyang Wang4,2, Xuechen Rao2,5, Ying Yu2, Wenxia Li2, Peng Zheng2,3, Libo Zhao1, Chanjuan Zhou2, Juncai Pu2,3, Deyu Yang1, Liang Fang1, Ping Ji4,6, Jinlin Song4,6, Hong Wei7, Peng Xie1,4,2,3.
Abstract
Introduction: Major depressive disorder is caused by gene-environment interactions, and the host microbiome has been recognized as an important environmental factor. However, the underlying mechanisms of the host-microbiota interactions that lead to depression are complex and remain poorly understood.Entities:
Keywords: Acetylation; Depression; Gut microbiota; Hippocampus; Posttranslational modifications; Succinylation
Year: 2020 PMID: 34026284 PMCID: PMC8132208 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.12.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Fig. 1Profiling the Lys acetylation and succinylation proteome in hippocampal samples from gut microbiome-remodeled mice. (A) There was a significant increase in immobility time in the forced swimming test (FST) in ‘depression microbiota’ recipient mice (n = 6) compared with ‘healthy microbiota’ recipient mice (n = 6), indicating significant depressive-like behavior. *p < 0.05. (B) There was a decrease in the center distance proportion in the open field test (OFT) in ‘depression microbiota’ recipient mice (n = 6) compared with ‘healthy microbiota’ recipient mice (n = 6), indicating significant anxiety-like behavior. *p < 0.05. (C) Workflow for the identification and quantification of lysine acetylation and succinylation in hippocampal tissue from gut microbiome-remodeled mice. (D, E) Distribution of mass error of all identified acetylated and succinylated peptides, respectively. (F) Distribution of peptide length of all identified acetylated and succinylated peptides. (G) The number of acetylation and succinylation sites within each modified protein. (H) Venn diagram showing the overlapped results between identified Lys acetylation and succinylation sites in hippocampal tissue from gut microbiome-remodeled mice. (I) Venn diagram showing the overlapped results between identified acetylated and succinylated proteins in hippocampal tissue from gut microbiome-remodeled mice.
Fig. 2Properties of the acetylation and succinylation proteome. (A, B) Heat maps showing features of the flanking sequences for all Lys acetylation and succinylation sites, respectively. Multiple hypothesis tests were performed for the p-values. (C) Venn diagram showing the overlapped results between significant Lys acetylation and succinylation sites in hippocampal tissue from gut microbiota-dysbiosis mice. (D) Venn diagram showing the overlapped results between significant acetylated and succinylated proteins in hippocampal tissue from gut microbiota-dysbiosis mice. (E) Secondary structure distribution and surface accessibility prediction of significantly acetylated sites. (F) Secondary structure distribution and surface accessibility prediction of significantly succinylated sites.
Fig. 3Annotations of the acetylation and succinylation proteome. (A, B) Venn diagrams showing the cellular localization of significantly acetylated and succinylated proteins, respectively. (C, D) Bar graphs showing the annotated cellular components enriched in significant acetylated and succinylated proteins, respectively. Max Level means the maximal annotated level of this term in the GO graph (tree), and the number indicates the depth of the GO term level.
Fig. 4The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways overlap between significantly acetylated and succinylated proteins in gut microbiota-dysbiosis mice. Venn diagram displaying the number of common and unique proteins between both post-translational modifications. The blue area displays the common KEGG pathways enriched in both succinylated and acetylated proteins, the green area shows the unique KEGG pathways enriched in succinylated proteins, and the red area shows the unique KEGG pathways enriched in acetylated proteins.
Fig. 5Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis for the significantly acetylated and succinylated proteins. (A) PPI network for the acetylated proteins. (B) PPI network for the succinylated proteins. (C) Subnetwork for the acetylated proteins involved in systemic lupus erythematosus. (D) Subnetwork for the acetylated proteins related to the cell cycle. (E) Subnetwork for the succinylated proteins related to the ribosome. (F) Subnetwork for the succinylated proteins involved in endocytosis. (G) Subnetwork for the succinylated proteins involved in oxidative phosphorylation.
Fig. 6Protein complex analysis for the significantly acetylated and succinylated proteins. (A, B) Degree of modification of significantly acetylated and succinylated proteins, respectively. (C, D) Heat maps generated by protein complex enrichment-based cluster analysis for acetylated and succinylated proteins, respectively.