| Literature DB >> 34026242 |
Justin Cikuru1, Ali Bitenga1, Juvenal Bazilashe Mukungu Balegamire2, Prince Mujumbe Salama1, Michelle M Hood3, Bhramar Mukherjee4, Alain Mukwege3, Sioban D Harlow1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess whether Healing in Harmony (HiH), a form of music therapy, improved women's mental health following conflict-related trauma and sexual violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo.Entities:
Keywords: Anxiety; Democratic Republic of Congo; depression; gender based violence; humanitarian crisis; mental health; music; post-traumatic stress disorder; sexual violence
Year: 2021 PMID: 34026242 PMCID: PMC8127635 DOI: 10.1017/gmh.2021.11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Ment Health (Camb) ISSN: 2054-4251
Fig. 1.Illustration of the stepped-wedge design. The HiH program was implemented sequentially across three time periods (orange): September to December 2017, February to April 2018, and June to August 2018, with data collection occurring in September 2017, December and January 2018, May 2018, and September 2018. Groups 2 and 3 contributed time as unexposed (red) and all groups contributed post-exposure time (green). −1 corresponds to the measure 3 months prior to treatment, 0 to the measure at start of treatment and +1, +2, +3 to the measures at immediately post-treatment and at the 3 and 6 month follow-ups, respectively.
Demographic characteristics and vulnerability factors of women enrolled in the HiH program in South Kivu, DRC
| Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| Age | 0.017 | ||||
| 15–24 | 24 (14.37%) | 7 (10.00%) | 6 (13.04%) | 11 (21.57%) | |
| 25–34 | 47 (28.14%) | 19 (27.14%) | 14 (30.43%) | 14 (27.45%) | |
| 35–44 | 40 (23.95%) | 26 (37.14%) | 5 (10.87%) | 9 (17.65%) | |
| 45–69 | 56 (33.53%) | 18 (25.71%) | 21 (45.65%) | 17 (33.33%) | |
| Schooling | 0.235 | ||||
| None | 64 (38.32%) | 22 (31.43%) | 23 (50.00%) | 19 (37.25%) | |
| Some primary | 57 (34.13%) | 28 (40.00%) | 10 (21.74%) | 19 (37.25%) | |
| Primary and above | 46 (27.54%) | 20 (28.57%) | 13 (28.26%) | 13 (25.49%) | |
| Marital status | 0.171 | ||||
| Married/co-habit | 105 (62.87%) | 44 (62.86%) | 28 (60.87%) | 33 (64.71%) | |
| Single | 9 (5.39%) | 1 (1.43%) | 3 (6.52%) | 5 (9.80%) | |
| Divorced/separated | 25 (14.97%) | 9 (12.86%) | 7 (15.22%) | 9 (17.65%) | |
| Widowed | 28 (16.77%) | 16 (22.86%) | 8 (17.39%) | 4 (7.84%) | |
| Has children | 0.236 | ||||
| No | 8 (4.79%) | 1 (1.43%) | 3 (6.52%) | 4 (7.84%) | |
| Yes | 159 (95.21%) | 69 (98.57%) | 43 (93.48%) | 47 (92.16%) | |
| Works own field | 0.069 | ||||
| No | 49 (29.34%) | 27 (38.57%) | 9 (19.57%) | 13 (25.49%) | |
| Yes | 118 (70.66%) | 43 (61.43%) | 37 (80.43%) | 38 (74.51%) | |
| Works other's field | 0.531 | ||||
| No | 42 (25.15%) | 18 (25.71%) | 9 (19.57%) | 15 (29.41%) | |
| Yes | 125 (74.85%) | 52 (74.29%) | 37 (80.43%) | 36 (70.59%) | |
| Job/small business | 0.605 | ||||
| No | 104 (62.28%) | 46 (65.71%) | 26 (56.52%) | 32 (62.75%) | |
| Yes | 63 (37.72%) | 24 (34.29%) | 20 (43.48%) | 19 (37.25%) | |
| Traumatic event | <0.001 | ||||
| No | 39 (23.35%) | 3 (4.29%) | 8 (17.39%) | 28 (54.90%) | |
| Yes | 128 (76.65%) | 67 (95.71%) | 38 (82.61%) | 23 (45.10%) | |
| Sexual violence survivor | 0.006 | ||||
| No | 98 (58.68%) | 32 (45.71%) | 28 (60.87%) | 38 (74.51%) | |
| Yes | 69 (41.32%) | 38 (54.29%) | 18 (39.13%) | 13 (25.49%) | |
| Refugee/displaced/forced from home | 0.036 | ||||
| No | 134 (80.24%) | 53 (75.71%) | 34 (73.91%) | 47 (92.16%) | |
| Yes | 33 (19.76%) | 17 (24.29%) | 12 (26.09%) | 4 (7.84%) | |
| Abandoned by husband | 0.734 | ||||
| No | 123 (73.65%) | 52 (74.29%) | 32 (69.57%) | 39 (76.47%) | |
| Yes | 44 (26.35%) | 18 (25.71%) | 14 (30.43%) | 12 (23.53%) | |
| Abandoned by family | 0.190 | ||||
| No | 137 (82.04%) | 55 (78.57%) | 36 (78.26%) | 46 (90.20%) | |
| Yes | 30 (17.96%) | 15 (21.43%) | 10 (21.74%) | 5 (9.80%) | |
| Abandoned by community | 0.058 | ||||
| No | 146 (87.43%) | 60 (85.71%) | 37 (80.43%) | 49 (96.08%) | |
| Yes | 21 (12.57%) | 10 (14.29%) | 9 (19.57%) | 2 (3.92%) | |
Chi-square test.
Fisher's exact test.
Fig. 2.Boxplots of anxiety, depression, and PTSD average scores by time, HiH program South Kivu, DRC by time.
Fig. 3.Boxplots of average scores for anxiety, depression, and PTSD by time and group, HiH program in South Kivu, DRC (n = 167).
Proportion (and 95% CIs) scoring positive for depression, anxiety, and PTSD among women enrolled in the HiH program in South Kivu, DRC by time (N = 167)
| Time | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | +2 | |
| Depression | 68.8% (59.5–78.0) | 73.9% (67.2–80.6) | 35.7% (28.2–43.2) | 34.2% (25.4–43.1) |
| Anxiety | 80.2% (72.2–88.2) | 84.2% (78.7–89.8) | 50.0% (42.2–57.8) | 36.9% (28.0–45.9) |
| PTSD | 54.2% (44.2–64.1) | 68.5% (61.4–75.6) | 36.3% (28.8–43.8) | 32.4% (23.7–41.1) |
| Scored positive | ||||
| on at least two | 62.5% (52.8–72.2) | 75.2% (68.6–81.7) | 39.5% (31.8–47.1) | 34.2% (25.4–43.1) |
| on all three | 54.2% (44.2–64.1) | 64.2% (56.9–71.6) | 28.5% (21.4–35.5) | 25.2% (17.1–33.3) |
As time + 3 includes only group 1 it is not presented here (see Fig. 2).
Regression models for depression, anxiety, and PTSD by time adjusted for group and age, among women enrolled in the HiH program in South Kivu, DRC (N = 167)
| Average score | Screened positive | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depression | Anxiety | PTSD | Depression | Anxiety | PTSD | |
| RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | ||||
| Time | ||||||
| −1 | −0.08 (−0.23 to 0.07) | −0.14 (−0.32 to 0.03) | −0.17 (−0.33 to −0.01) | 0.98 (0.83 to 1.15) | 0.95 (0.84 to 1.07) | 0.79 (0.64 to 0.97) |
| 0 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| +1 | −0.54 (−0.67 to −0.42) | −0.67 (−0.82 to −0.52) | −0.53 (−0.65 to −0.40) | 0.49 (0.40 to 0.61) | 0.61 (0.52 to 0.72) | 0.54 (0.44 to 0.67) |
| +2 | −0.62 (−0.76 to −0.47) | −0.88 (−1.05 to −0.71) | −0.58 (−0.72 to −0.43) | 0.42 (0.32 to 0.55) | 0.42 (0.33 to 0.54) | 0.46 (0.35 to 0.61) |
| +3 | −0.82 (−0.97 to −0.66) | −1.04 (−1.21 to −0.86) | −0.81 (−0.98 to −0.64) | 0.31 (0.20 to 0.47) | 0.33 (0.22 to 0.49) | 0.26 (0.15 to 0.44) |
| Time | ||||||
| Pre (−1/0) | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Post (1/2/3) | −0.57 (−0.66 to −0.47) | −0.73 (−0.85 to −0.62) | −0.52 (−0.62 to −0.42) | 0.44 (0.37 to 0.53) | 0.52 (0.45 to 0.60) | 0.50 (0.41 to 0.61) |
| Vulnerability factor | ||||||
| Sexual violence survivor | 0.13 (0.01 to 0.24) | 0.01 (−0.13 to 0.15) | 0.15 (0.03 to 0.28) | 1.34 (1.16 to 1.56) | 1.06 (0.93 to 1.19) | 1.30 (1.07 to 1.57) |
| Refugee/displaced | 0.29 (0.18 to 0.40) | 0.24 (0.11 to 0.36) | 0.27 (0.16 to 0.38) | 1.39 (1.19 to 1.63) | 1.26 (1.11 to 1.42) | 1.37 (1.16 to 1.62) |
| Abandoned by husband or family | 0.20 (0.09 to 0.31) | 0.19 (0.06 to 0.32) | 0.24 (0.12 to 0.35) | 1.40 (1.18 to 1.65) | – | 1.55 (1.30 to 1.85) |
| Abandoned by family | – | – | – | – | 1.20 (1.05 to 1.37) | – |
Models adjusted for time (pre v. post-treatment), group, and age.
Proportion (95% CI) of women participating in the HiH program reporting they felt happy, sad, proud, hopeful and that they liked themselves by time, South Kivu, DRC by time (N = 167)
| Time | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | +2 | |
| Happy | 40.6% (30.8–50.5) | 41.2% (33.7–48.7) | 62.4% (54.8–70.0) | 68.5% (59.8–77.1) |
| Sad | 33.3% (23.9–42.8) | 35.2% (27.9–42.4) | 17.8% (11.9–23.8) | 21.6% (14.0–29.3) |
| Proud | 37.5% (27.8–47.2) | 30.3% (23.3–37.3) | 59.2% (51.6–66.9) | 67.6% (58.9–76.3) |
| Hopeful | 77.1% (68.7–85.5) | 74.6% (67.9–81.2) | 83.4% (77.6–89.3) | 82.9% (75.9–89.9) |
| Like themselves | 38.5% (28.8–48.3) | 40.0% (32.5–47.5) | 66.2% (58.9–73.6) | 68.5% (59.8–77.1) |
Regression models for perceptions of self by time adjusted for group and age, women enrolled in the HiH program in South Kivu, DRC (N = 167)
| Happiness | Sadness | Proud of oneself | Hope | Like as are | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | RR (95% CI) | |
| Time | |||||
| −1 | 1.01 (0.74–1.36) | 1.04 (0.72–1.49) | 1.23 (0.88–1.71) | 1.09 (0.95–1.26) | 1.01 (0.74–1.36) |
| 0 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| 1 | 1.53 (1.25–1.87) | 0.50 (0.34–0.73) | 1.96 (1.55–2.47) | 1.12 (1.02–1.24) | 1.65 (1.33–2.04) |
| 2 | 1.73 (1.38–2.17) | 0.64 (0.43–0.96) | 2.22 (1.71–2.88) | 1.08 (0.96–1.21) | 1.65 (1.34–2.04) |
| 3 | 1.71 (1.36–2.15) | 0.49 (0.28–0.85) | 2.47 (1.88–3.25) | 1.04 (0.91–1.20) | 1.93 (1.55–2.41) |
| Time | |||||
| Pre-treatment (−1/0) | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Post-treatment (1/2/3) | 1.60 (1.36–1.88) | 0.53 (0.40–0.71) | 1.94 (1.62–2.33) | 1.08 (0.99, 1.17) | 1.69 (1.42–2.02) |
Models adjusted for group and age.