| Literature DB >> 34026066 |
Yilin Zhao1, Chengbin Zhao1, Xudong Tang2, Jingyi Zhou1, Hao Li1, Hao Zhang1, Jingsheng Liu1.
Abstract
In this study, corn flour with 24% w/w moisture content was extruded, and cellulose at varied weight ratios was added in order to investigate its effect on the extrudate's physicochemical properties. Twin-screw extrusion was divided into five temperature zones, and the screw temperature profile was 60℃, 120℃, 140℃, 120℃, and 110℃, respectively, and screw speed was 150 rpm. The cellulose content was 1%-15% w/w. Results showed that the addition of cellulose led to an increase in hardness, L* and b* of the extruded samples, and a decrease in degree of expansion, a*, thermal enthalpy of the sample paste. The sample paste exhibited a solid-like characteristic. Microscopic morphology analysis showed that surface wrinkles of the sample increased with the increase of cellulose addition. The addition of cellulose can effectively increase the degree of puffing of corn flour-cellulose fiber extrudates.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose; corn flour; extrusion; microstructure; physicochemical properties
Year: 2021 PMID: 34026066 PMCID: PMC8116859 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
FIGURE 1Effect of Different conditions on SEI on Extruded Samples. a‐f Means in the same group with different letters were significantly different (p < .05) from each other. (The same color represents the same group.)
Results of RVA
| Cellulose addition/(wt%) | Pasting temperature/℃ | Peak Viscosity/RVU | Trough viscosity/RVU | Final Viscosity/RVU | Breakdown value/RVU | Setback Value/RVU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 72.15 ± 0.63a | 2,589.50 ± 16.06a | 1842.5 ± 10.1a | 3,683.00 ± 2.83a | 747.00 ± 14.04a | 1,840.50 ± 10.21a |
| 1% | 72.60 ± 1.31ab | 2,423.5 ± 19.8b | 1764.50 ± 17.07ab | 3,514.50 ± 17.47b | 659.00 ± 12.73b | 1,750.00 ± 9.60ab |
| 3% | 73.075 ± 0.600ab | 2,299.50 ± 11.61b | 1675.00 ± 15.55b | 3,326.50 ± 14.54c | 624.50 ± 9.15b | 1651.50 ± 10.01bc |
| 5% | 72.95 ± 0.64ab | 2055.50 ± 9.19c | 1503.50 ± 17.68c | 3,035.00 ± 19.39d | 552.00 ± 6.88c | 1531.50 ± 7.08d |
| 7% | 73.025 ± 0.610ab | 2018.50 ± 13.03c | 1527.50 ± 10.20c | 2,976.00 ± 15.29d | 491.00 ± 2.82c | 1,448.50 ± 4.75d |
| 9% | 73.05 ± 0.56ab | 1709.50 ± 15.96e | 1,312.00 ± 10.71d | 2,614.50 ± 14.65f | 397.50 ± 4.75 | 1,302.50 ± 5.02ef |
| 11% | 72.575 ± 0.030ab | 1851.50 ± 13.03d | 1,356.50 ± 11.51d | 2,766.50 ± 12.81e | 495.00 ± 8.48c | 1,410.00 ± 11.21de |
| 13% | 73.475 ± 0.030ab | 1663.00 ± 13.43e | 1,258.50 ± 12.73ed | 2,499.50 ± 15.26f | 404.50 ± 0.71d | 1,241.00 ± 2.53g |
| 15% | 74.275 ± 1.100b | 1,497.50 ± 20.50f | 1,172.00 ± 19.80e | 2,259.50 ± 16.01f | 325.50 ± 0.71e | 1,087.50 ± 2.89h |
a‐h Means in the same columns with different letters were significantly different (p <.05) from each other.
Effect of Cellulose Addition on Hardness of Extruded Samples
| Cellulose addition (wt%) | Hardness ( |
|---|---|
| 0% | 5.11 ± 1.12a |
| 1% | 9.49 ± 1.48b |
| 3% | 16.40 ± 1.98d |
| 5% | 14.73 ± 1.62cd |
| 7% | 15.40 ± 3.75cd |
| 9% | 12.50 ± 1.69bc |
| 11% | 14.73 ± 1.56cd |
| 13% | 20.02 ± 1.52e |
| 15% | 25.73 ± 1.46f |
Different letters in the same columns (a, b, c…) represent significant differences (p <.05).
FIGURE 2Effect of Cellulose Addition on SEI of Extruded Samples. a‐e Means in the same group with different letters were significantly different (p < .05) from each other
FIGURE 3Effect of Cellulose Addition on Color Value of Extruded Samples. a‐e Means in the same group with different letters were significantly different (p < .05) from each other
FIGURE 4FTIR Spectroscopy Scanning of Extruded Cellulose–corn Flour (percentages denote percent of cellulose added)
FIGURE 5Cellulose–corn Extrusion Flour DSC Curve (percentages denote percent of cellulose added)
Cellulose–corn Extrusion Flour Thermal Properties
| Cellulose addition (wt%) | Starting temperature(°C) | Peak temperature(°C) | Termination temperature(°C) | △H (J/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 58.31 ± 0.78a | 72.71 ± 1.76c | 88.19 ± 0.87d | 7.08 ± 0.25e |
| 1% | 58.93 ± 1.82ab | 70.50 ± 1.29abc | 86.68 ± 0.96cd | 6.46 ± 0.16cd |
| 3% | 60.34 ± 0.47ab | 68.37 ± 0.55a | 86.55 ± 1.14cd | 6.09 ± 0.37cd |
| 5% | 60.42 ± 2.02ab | 70.00 ± 0.34ab | 85.36 ± 1.56bc | 5.86 ± 0.26bcd |
| 7% | 60.95 ± 1.95ab | 68.02 ± 0.92a | 85.35 ± 0.34bc | 5.56 ± 0.14bcd |
| 9% | 61.44 ± 0.53ab | 69.80 ± 0.19ab | 84.84 ± 0.96bc | 5.19 ± 0.49abc |
| 11% | 61.66 ± 0.79ab | 70.64 ± 0.33abc | 84.59 ± 0.62bc | 5.12 ± 0.37abc |
| 13% | 61.66 ± 1.75ab | 71.06 ± 1.52bc | 84.04 ± 0.57b | 4.79 ± 1.05ab |
| 15% | 62.61 ± 1.56b | 70.62 ± 0.16abc | 81.55 ± 0.39a | 4.21 ± 0.09a |
Different letters in the same columns (a, b, c…) represent significant differences (p <.05).
FIGURE 6SEM of Extruded Corn Flour with Different Cellulose Contents(a, b, c… represent different cellulose additions,a is 0,b is 1,c is 3…and i is 15%)