Literature DB >> 34025268

In Epilepsy Surgery, Pathology Matters, and Lesions Need to Go.

Dario J Englot.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 34025268      PMCID: PMC7863304          DOI: 10.1177/1535759720968822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Curr        ISSN: 1535-7511            Impact factor:   7.500


× No keyword cloud information.

Commentary

Deciding whether to offer surgical intervention for drug resistant epilepsy and counseling patients about the likelihood of success are both critically important processes influenced by many factors. These factors include the presumed epilepsy etiology, level of confidence in the presurgical localization, and personal experiences of the individual center and provider. It is commonly understood that patients harboring a pathological lesion are more likely to achieve seizure freedom than those with nonlesional epilepsy. However, this knowledge is mostly informed by small cohort studies published over several decades and meta-analysis of multiple heterogenous investigations. Although randomized controlled trials supply the highest level of evidence, these are rare in epilepsy surgery and typically include a small patient sample. Thus, there is value in large, multicenter, longitudinal studies where data collection is fairly organized and homogenous, and confidence in the reliability of results is relatively high. Prior to the presently highlighted investigation, only 5 studies relating surgical pathology to seizure outcome in epilepsy surgery have included more than 500 patients, and none included more than 2000 individuals. Also, these prior large investigations did not evaluate drug freedom after surgery. Lamberink and colleagues retrospectively examined a large cohort of over 9000 surgical epilepsy patients across 37 European centers.[1] Histopathological diagnosis was related to postoperative seizure outcome and drug freedom, with outcome data available in more than 8000 individuals at 2 years and over 5000 patients at 5 years. Approximately two-thirds of the patients underwent temporal lobe surgery, while one-third received an extratemporal lobe resection. Overall, 68% of patients were free of disabling seizures 2 years after surgery, and 66% were seizure free at 5 years. Outcomes were more favorable in patients with a shorter duration of epilepsy and in individuals receiving temporal lobe surgery. The proportion of patients who were both seizure free and completely off antiepileptic medication was 16% at 2 years and 33% at 5 years. Children were more likely than adults to be free of medications at 5 years, even though seizure freedom rates between the groups were similar, perhaps suggesting that providers are more aggressive in weaning medication in the pediatric age group. The authors found striking differences in surgical outcome depending on pathology, as approximately 70% to 80% of individuals harboring low-grade neuroepithelial tumor, vascular malformation, or hippocampal sclerosis were seizure free at 5 years, while only 50% to 60% of patients with malformation of cortical development (including focal cortical dysplasia type 1), or no histopathological lesion achieved this outcome. Rates of complete medication discontinuation by the 5-year mark also differed among patients with low-grade neuroepithelial tumor (47%), vascular malformation (37%), hippocampal sclerosis (33%), malformation of cortical development (27%), and no clear pathological lesion (20%). Among category subgroups, the highest rate of medication discontinuation at 5 years was seen in patients with ganglioglioma (51%), while the lowest rates were observed in individuals with non-Rasmussen encephalitis (16%), focal cortical dysplasia type 1 (15%), and normal tissue without gliosis (14%). Limitations of the highlighted study should be noted, including its retrospective nature, and limited clinical data points obtained from each center. Nevertheless, the findings of Lamberink and colleagues will help guide patient counselling regarding likelihood of seizure freedom based on suspected epilepsy etiology. They confirm that individuals with intractable epilepsy harboring a clear radiographic lesion are favorable surgical candidates, and if safe, surgery should be strongly considered. At our center, we unfortunately encounter many patients who have been treated for drug resistant epilepsy in the community for years and have never had a neuroimaging study. A 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with epilepsy-specific sequences is a critical part of the presurgical evaluation and should be obtained early. Although not yet widely implemented, there is also some suggestion that 7T MRI may help uncover lesions not identified at 3T.[2] It is interesting that patients with focal cortical dysplasia type 1 or mild malformation of cortical development have relatively similar rates of seizure freedom as individuals without any pathological lesion. This may reflect a more diffuse pathological process that is not fully delineated by MRI, or more complex brain network involvement than other pathologies. Nevertheless, an approximately 50% chance of long-term seizure freedom remains significantly higher than the likelihood of this outcome with continued medical therapy in drug-resistant patients.[3] Prior studies have suggested that when identified, gross total resection of the radiographic lesion, if safely achievable, confers the most favorable seizure outcome.[4] In addition, the highlighted study confirms that medication wean can be safely achieved in many patients who are stable and seizure free more than 1 to 2 years after surgery, although individual cases will differ. The short-term risk of breakthrough seizures should be considered and has been documented in individual cases series by others[5] and in prior meta-analyses by the present group.[6] The study by Lamberink and colleagues also confirms that seizure freedom is more likely in patients with a shorter duration of epilepsy, so surgical evaluation should be pursued early in drug-resistant patients. Unfortunately, epilepsy surgery continues to be underutilized, with only a minority of patients being referred for presurgical testing.[7,8] Guidelines suggest that patients who continue to have seizures after one year despite 2 well-tolerated antiepileptic drug trials should be referred to a tertiary epilepsy center for evaluation.[9] In temporal lobe epilepsy, the considerably improved efficacy of early surgery over continued medical therapy has been demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial.[10] In short, if seizures are drug resistant, refer for early surgical evaluation. If a lesion is found, it likely needs to go.
  10 in total

1.  What can we do for people with drug-resistant epilepsy? The 2016 Wartenberg Lecture.

Authors:  Jerome Engel
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Treated With Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs: A 30-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Zhibin Chen; Martin J Brodie; Danny Liew; Patrick Kwan
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 3.  Individualised prediction model of seizure recurrence and long-term outcomes after withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs in seizure-free patients: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Herm J Lamberink; Willem M Otte; Ada T Geerts; Milen Pavlovic; Julio Ramos-Lizana; Anthony G Marson; Jan Overweg; Letícia Sauma; Luigi M Specchio; Michael Tennison; Tania M O Cardoso; Shlomo Shinnar; Dieter Schmidt; Karin Geleijns; Kees P J Braun
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jerome Engel; Michael P McDermott; Samuel Wiebe; John T Langfitt; John M Stern; Sandra Dewar; Michael R Sperling; Irenita Gardiner; Giuseppe Erba; Itzhak Fried; Margaret Jacobs; Harry V Vinters; Scott Mintzer; Karl Kieburtz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Practice parameter: temporal lobe and localized neocortical resections for epilepsy: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, in association with the American Epilepsy Society and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons.

Authors:  J Engel; S Wiebe; J French; M Sperling; P Williamson; D Spencer; R Gumnit; C Zahn; E Westbrook; B Enos
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Trends in lobectomy/amygdalohippocampectomy over time and the impact of hospital surgical volume on hospitalization outcomes: A population-based study.

Authors:  Churl-Su Kwon; Leah Blank; Lan Mu; Nathalie Jetté
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 7.  Rates and predictors of seizure freedom in resective epilepsy surgery: an update.

Authors:  Dario J Englot; Edward F Chang
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Value of 7T MRI and post-processing in patients with nonlesional 3T MRI undergoing epilepsy presurgical evaluation.

Authors:  Irene Wang; Sehong Oh; Ingmar Blümcke; Roland Coras; Balu Krishnan; Sanghoon Kim; Aaron McBride; Olesya Grinenko; Yicong Lin; Margit Overmyer; Tin Tun Aung; Mark Lowe; Mykol Larvie; Andreas V Alexopoulos; William Bingaman; Jorge A Gonzalez-Martinez; Imad Najm; Stephen E Jones
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 5.864

9.  Seizure outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs after epilepsy surgery according to histopathological diagnosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study.

Authors:  Herm J Lamberink; Willem M Otte; Ingmar Blümcke; Kees P J Braun
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 44.182

10.  Reducing versus stopping antiepileptic medications after temporal lobe surgery.

Authors:  Ruta Yardi; Anna Irwin; Husam Kayyali; Ajay Gupta; Dileep Nair; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; William Bingaman; Imad M Najm; Lara E Jehi
Journal:  Ann Clin Transl Neurol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.511

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.