Literature DB >> 34024958

Demonstrating the ascendancy of COVID-19 research using acronyms.

Adrian Barnett1, Zoë Doubleday2.   

Abstract

"COVID" which stands for corona virus disease, has become the world's most infamous acronym. Previous analysis of acronyms in health and medical journals found a growing use of acronyms over time in titles and abstracts, with "DNA" as the most common. Here we examine acronyms in the pandemic year of 2020 to show the dramatic rise of COVID-related research. "COVID" was over five times more frequently used than "DNA" in 2020, and in just one year it has become the sixth most popular acronym of all time, surpassing "AIDS", "PCR" and "MRI". © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID; Journals; Research

Year:  2021        PMID: 34024958      PMCID: PMC8124093          DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04016-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scientometrics        ISSN: 0138-9130            Impact factor:   3.238


Introduction

The current global pandemic has had an enormous impact on the world, reaching every corner of the globe and touching almost every person. Science has been a front-line response to COVID, with tremendous successes in new treatments for sick patients (The RECOVERY Collaborative Group, 2020) and multiple efficacious vaccines developed in record time (Jackson et al. 2020). There has been a huge growth in published research on COVID, with many scientists switching their research effort to fight the pandemic. In 2020, around 6% of health and medical papers were on COVID-19, with over 100,000 articles published (Else 2020). There was also an increase in non-COVID related research, with a 92% increase in submissions to health and medical journals compared with 2019. Here we show an alternative measure of the growth in COVID research, by using acronyms.

Methods and materials

We updated our previous observational study of acronyms in papers on the PubMed database over the years 1950 to 2019 to include 2020 (Barnett and Doubleday 2020). The data were downloaded from PubMed on 16 February 2021. Our algorithm extracted acronyms, initialisms and abbreviations from the titles and abstracts. We ignored hyphens, so “COVID-19” was recorded as “COVID”.

Results

In 2020 “COVID” was the most popular acronym in titles and the second most popular in abstracts only behind “CI” for confidence interval (Table 1). There were over 57,000 titles using “COVID”, which was over 5 times the previous highest annual use of an acronym for “DNA” in 2019.
Table 1

The top five acronyms in titles and abstracts in 2019 and 2020

YearTitlesAbstracts
AcronymNumberAcronymNumber
2019DNA10,873CI218,981
HIV9,485DNA85,677
RNA8,636OR80,855
CT4,686IL72,468
MRI4,619RNA60,661
2020COVID57,074CI265,526
SARS11,747COVID146,875
DNA11,189OR96,336
CoV10,981DNA88,934
RNA10,476IL78,994
The top five acronyms in titles and abstracts in 2019 and 2020 “SARS” and “CoV” were the second and fourth most popular acronyms in titles in 2020. In 2019 there were only 24 uses of “SARS” in titles, meaning it was outside the 2,000th most popular acronyms in 2019. “COVID” is the sixth most popular acronym in titles using all the data since 1950, surpassing all the uses of “AIDS”, “PCR” and “MRI” in just one year. The figure shows the sudden ascendancy of “COVID”.

Discussion

Using acronyms shows that the increase in research on COVID-19 is unprecedented and surpasses all previous shifts in research. There was a large rise in research on HIV and AIDS starting in the late 1980s (Fig 1), but whilst “HIV” was consistently in the top ten acronyms from 1988, it never surpassed “DNA”. “COVID” has eclipsed “HIV” and even “DNA” in just one year. “COVID” is the world’s most renowned acronym and has dramatically changed health and medical research.
Fig. 1

The most popular scientific acronyms in health and medical journals through time. Using the frequency of selected acronyms in titles from 1950 to 2020. Selected acronyms are those that have been either: (1) a top-10 acronym for 10 years or more or (2) a top-10 acronym that has been mentioned more than 1,000 times in any given year. The most popular acronyms in 2019 and 2020 are individually labelled

The most popular scientific acronyms in health and medical journals through time. Using the frequency of selected acronyms in titles from 1950 to 2020. Selected acronyms are those that have been either: (1) a top-10 acronym for 10 years or more or (2) a top-10 acronym that has been mentioned more than 1,000 times in any given year. The most popular acronyms in 2019 and 2020 are individually labelled
  3 in total

1.  How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing - in seven charts.

Authors:  Holly Else
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 - Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Lisa A Jackson; Evan J Anderson; Nadine G Rouphael; Paul C Roberts; Mamodikoe Makhene; Rhea N Coler; Michele P McCullough; James D Chappell; Mark R Denison; Laura J Stevens; Andrea J Pruijssers; Adrian McDermott; Britta Flach; Nicole A Doria-Rose; Kizzmekia S Corbett; Kaitlyn M Morabito; Sijy O'Dell; Stephen D Schmidt; Phillip A Swanson; Marcelino Padilla; John R Mascola; Kathleen M Neuzil; Hamilton Bennett; Wellington Sun; Etza Peters; Mat Makowski; Jim Albert; Kaitlyn Cross; Wendy Buchanan; Rhonda Pikaart-Tautges; Julie E Ledgerwood; Barney S Graham; John H Beigel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The growth of acronyms in the scientific literature.

Authors:  Adrian Barnett; Zoe Doubleday
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 8.140

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Be careful with abbreviations.

Authors:  Richard Ricky Villar
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2021-10-28

2.  Suggestions to the article: demonstrating the ascendancy of COVID-19 research using acronyms.

Authors:  Julie Chi Chow; Tsair-Wei Chien; Willy Chou
Journal:  Scientometrics       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.801

3.  Using the Sankey diagram to visualize article features on the topics of whole-exome sequencing (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) since 2012: Bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Meng-Ju Li; Tsair-Wei Chien; Kuang-Wen Liao; Feng-Jie Lai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.