Yan-Nan Feng1, Zhen-Hua Xu2, Jun-Ting Liu1, Xiao-Lin Sun1, De-Qing Wang3, Yang Yu4. 1. Department of Transfusion Medicine, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Rd., Beijing, 100853, China. 2. Beijing Hexing Chuanglian Health Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, 100176, China. 3. Department of Transfusion Medicine, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Rd., Beijing, 100853, China. deqingw@vip.sina.com. 4. Department of Transfusion Medicine, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Rd., Beijing, 100853, China. yuyangpla301@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The vital signs of trauma patients are complex and changeable, and the prediction of blood transfusion demand mainly depends on doctors' experience and trauma scoring system; therefore, it cannot be accurately predicted. In this study, a machine learning decision tree algorithm [classification and regression tree (CRT) and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)] was proposed for the demand prediction of traumatic blood transfusion to provide technical support for doctors. METHODS: A total of 1371 trauma patients who were diverted to the Emergency Department of the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2014 to January 2018 were collected from an emergency trauma database. The vital signs, laboratory examination parameters and blood transfusion volume were used as variables, and the non-invasive parameters and all (non-invasive + invasive) parameters were used to construct an intelligent prediction model for red blood cell (RBC) demand by logistic regression (LR), CRT and XGBoost. The prediction accuracy of the model was compared with the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: For non-invasive parameters, the LR method was the best, with an AUC of 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.657-0.775], which was higher than the CRT (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.633-0.751) and the XGBoost (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.654-0.756, P < 0.05). The trauma location and shock index are important prediction parameters. For all the prediction parameters, XGBoost was the best, with an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.893-0.981), which was higher than the LR (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.744-0.850) and the CRT (AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.779-0.853, P < 0.05). Haematocrit (Hct) is an important prediction parameter. CONCLUSIONS: The classification performance of the intelligent prediction model of red blood cell transfusion in trauma patients constructed by the decision tree algorithm is not inferior to that of the traditional LR method. It can be used as a technical support to assist doctors to make rapid and accurate blood transfusion decisions in emergency rescue environment, so as to improve the success rate of patient treatment.
BACKGROUND: The vital signs of traumapatients are complex and changeable, and the prediction of blood transfusion demand mainly depends on doctors' experience and trauma scoring system; therefore, it cannot be accurately predicted. In this study, a machine learning decision tree algorithm [classification and regression tree (CRT) and eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)] was proposed for the demand prediction of traumatic blood transfusion to provide technical support for doctors. METHODS: A total of 1371 traumapatients who were diverted to the Emergency Department of the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2014 to January 2018 were collected from an emergency trauma database. The vital signs, laboratory examination parameters and blood transfusion volume were used as variables, and the non-invasive parameters and all (non-invasive + invasive) parameters were used to construct an intelligent prediction model for red blood cell (RBC) demand by logistic regression (LR), CRT and XGBoost. The prediction accuracy of the model was compared with the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: For non-invasive parameters, the LR method was the best, with an AUC of 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.657-0.775], which was higher than the CRT (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.633-0.751) and the XGBoost (AUC 0.71, 95% CI 0.654-0.756, P < 0.05). The trauma location and shock index are important prediction parameters. For all the prediction parameters, XGBoost was the best, with an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.893-0.981), which was higher than the LR (AUC 0.80, 95% CI 0.744-0.850) and the CRT (AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.779-0.853, P < 0.05). Haematocrit (Hct) is an important prediction parameter. CONCLUSIONS: The classification performance of the intelligent prediction model of red blood cell transfusion in traumapatients constructed by the decision tree algorithm is not inferior to that of the traditional LR method. It can be used as a technical support to assist doctors to make rapid and accurate blood transfusion decisions in emergency rescue environment, so as to improve the success rate of patient treatment.
Authors: Russ S Kotwal; Jeffrey T Howard; Jean A Orman; Bruce W Tarpey; Jeffrey A Bailey; Howard R Champion; Robert L Mabry; John B Holcomb; Kirby R Gross Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Michelle H Scerbo; John B Holcomb; Ethan Taub; Keith Gates; Joseph D Love; Charles E Wade; Bryan A Cotton Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Demetrios Demetriades; James Murray; Kiriakos Charalambides; Kathy Alo; George Velmahos; Peter Rhee; Linda Chan Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Brian J Eastridge; Robert L Mabry; Peter Seguin; Joyce Cantrell; Terrill Tops; Paul Uribe; Olga Mallett; Tamara Zubko; Lynne Oetjen-Gerdes; Todd E Rasmussen; Frank K Butler; Russ S Kotwal; Russell S Kotwal; John B Holcomb; Charles Wade; Howard Champion; Mimi Lawnick; Leon Moores; Lorne H Blackbourne Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Stacy A Shackelford; Deborah J Del Junco; Nicole Powell-Dunford; Edward L Mazuchowski; Jeffrey T Howard; Russ S Kotwal; Jennifer Gurney; Frank K Butler; Kirby Gross; Zsolt T Stockinger Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Zongyang Mou; Laura N Godat; Robert El-Kareh; Allison E Berndtson; Jay J Doucet; Todd W Costantini Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 3.697