Literature DB >> 34023572

Performance characteristics of the Abbott Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 assay.

Garrett A Perchetti1, Gregory Pepper1, Lasata Shrestha1, Katrina LaTurner1, Da Yae Kim1, Meei-Li Huang1, Keith R Jerome2, Alexander L Greninger3.   

Abstract

Mass molecular diagnostic testing for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has drawn on laboratory developed tests, commercial assays, and fully-automated platforms to accommodate widespread demand. The Alinity m instrument by Abbott is capable of detecting several clinically relevant pathogens and has recently received FDA emergency use authorization for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing. The Alinity m performs automatic sample preparation, RT-PCR assembly, amplification, detection, and result calculation in under two hours. Here, we validate the performance characteristics of the Alinity m SARS-CoV-2 assay in comparison with the Roche cobas 6800 and Hologic Panther Fusion platforms. Across 178 positive and 195 negative nasopharyngeal swab specimens (CT range 14.30-38.84), the Alinity m detected one additional positive specimen that was found to be negative on the Roche cobas 6800 (PPA 100%, NPA 99.5%). Across a separate set of 30 positive and 174 negative nasopharyngeal swab specimens (CT range 14.1-38.5), the Alinity m had 100% positive and negative agreement with the Hologic Panther Fusion. Using SeraCare SARS-CoV-2 RNA standards, the assay limit of detection was verified to be two-fold more sensitive than the parameters stated by the SARS-CoV-2 AMP kit package insert, at 50 virus copies/mL. Assay specificity was 100% over 20 specimens positive for other respiratory viruses and intraday precision was 100% concordant with <2% CV. These data illst u illustrate the Abbott Alinity m system's high concordance with reference assays and analyti high analytical for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abbott; Alinity m; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Limit of Detection; SARS-CoV-2

Year:  2021        PMID: 34023572     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cycle Threshold Values from Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays: Interpretation and Potential Use Cases.

Authors:  Alexander J McAdam
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 2.  An Overview of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Diagnostics in Europe.

Authors:  Emma Davies; Hamzah Z Farooq; Benjamin Brown; Peter Tilston; Ashley McEwan; Andrew Birtles; Robert William O'Hara; Shazaad Ahmad; Nicholas Machin; Louise Hesketh; Malcolm Guiver
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Does Not Have Higher Nasal Viral Loads Compared to the Delta Variant in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Individuals.

Authors:  Andrew M Laitman; Joshua A Lieberman; Noah G Hoffman; Pavitra Roychoudhury; Patrick C Mathias; Alexander L Greninger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 11.677

4.  COVID-19 in Elderly, Immunocompromised or Diabetic Patients-From Immune Monitoring to Clinical Management in the Hospital.

Authors:  Korbinian Wünsch; Olympia E Anastasiou; Mira Alt; Leonie Brochhagen; Maxim Cherneha; Laura Thümmler; Lukas van Baal; Rabea J Madel; Monika Lindemann; Christian Taube; Oliver Witzke; Hana Rohn; Adalbert Krawczyk; Sarah Jansen
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  Non-Pharmacological Preventive Measures Had an Impact on COVID-19 in Healthcare Workers before the Vaccination Effect: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Mireia Utzet; Fernando G Benavides; Rocío Villar; Andrea Burón; Maria Sala; Luis-Eugenio López; Pau Gomar; Xavier Castells; Pilar Diaz; José María Ramada; Consol Serra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.