Literature DB >> 34023069

Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of stillbirth in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Karoline Gundersen Sarmon1, Troels Eliasen2, Ulla Breth Knudsen3, Bjørn Bay4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk of stillbirth from in vitro types of assisted reproductive technologies compared with spontaneous conception (SC), limited to singleton births.
DESIGN: Systematic literature search and search chaining on online databases: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus.
SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Singleton pregnancies from in vitro fertilization (IVF) or fertilization by IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Adjusted odds ratio for stillbirth or prevalence of stillbirth in case-control groups of IVF/IVF-ICSI singletons and SCs, respectively, in matched studies. RESULT(S): A total of 19 studies were included, and study quality was mixed. Ten studies qualified for inclusion to the meta-analysis, which revealed a significantly increased risk of stillbirth in IVF/IVF-ICSI compared with that in SC (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.82 [1.37-2.42]), and there was no evidence of publication bias. CONCLUSION(S): In vitro fertilization and IVF-ICSI treatment increases the risk of stillbirth compared with natural conception. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO 216768.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproduction; ICSI; IVF; adverse obstetric outcomes; stillbirth

Year:  2021        PMID: 34023069     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  4 in total

1.  Temporal trends and adverse perinatal outcomes of twin pregnancies at differing gestational ages: an observational study from China between 2012-2020.

Authors:  Peiran Chen; Mingrong Li; Yi Mu; Yanping Wang; Zheng Liu; Qi Li; Xiaohong Li; Li Dai; Yanxia Xie; Juan Liang; Jun Zhu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Obesity Class Impacts Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes Independent of Diabetes.

Authors:  Kirsten Neal; Shahid Ullah; Sarah J Glastras
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.555

3.  Is telephone follow-up reliable in maternal and neonatal outcomes surveys in in vitro fertilization?

Authors:  Ling Sun; Jian Xu; Pei-Ling Liang; Chun-Lin Liu
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  Predicting singleton antepartum stillbirth by the demographic Fetal Medicine Foundation Risk Calculator-A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Dana A Muin; Karin Windsperger; Nadia Attia; Herbert Kiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.