Michèle van Vugt1, Kamija S Phiri2, Robert S McCann3,4,5, Alinune N Kabaghe4,1, Paula Moraga6,7, Steven Gowelo3,4, Monicah M Mburu3,4, Tinashe Tizifa4,1, Michael G Chipeta4,6,8,9, William Nkhono4, Aurelio Di Pasquale10,11, Nicolas Maire10,11, Lucinda Manda-Taylor4, Themba Mzilahowa12, Henk van den Berg3, Peter J Diggle6, Dianne J Terlouw4,9,13, Willem Takken3. 1. Center for Tropical Medicine & Travel Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. School of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. kphiri@medcol.mw. 3. Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 4. School of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. 5. Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA. 6. CHICAS, Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. 7. Computer, Electrical and Mathematical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. 8. Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 9. Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Program, Blantyre, Malawi. 10. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. 11. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 12. MAC Communicable Diseases Action Centre, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi. 13. Clinical Sciences Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current standard interventions are not universally sufficient for malaria elimination. The effects of community-based house improvement (HI) and larval source management (LSM) as supplementary interventions to the Malawi National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) interventions were assessed in the context of an intensive community engagement programme. METHODS: The study was a two-by-two factorial, cluster-randomized controlled trial in Malawi. Village clusters were randomly assigned to four arms: a control arm; HI; LSM; and HI + LSM. Malawi NMCP interventions and community engagement were used in all arms. Household-level, cross-sectional surveys were conducted on a rolling, 2-monthly basis to measure parasitological and entomological outcomes over 3 years, beginning with one baseline year. The primary outcome was the entomological inoculation rate (EIR). Secondary outcomes included mosquito density, Plasmodium falciparum prevalence, and haemoglobin levels. All outcomes were assessed based on intention to treat, and comparisons between trial arms were conducted at both cluster and household level. RESULTS:Eighteen clusters derived from 53 villages with 4558 households and 20,013 people were randomly assigned to the four trial arms. The mean nightly EIR fell from 0.010 infectious bites per person (95% CI 0.006-0.015) in the baseline year to 0.001 (0.000, 0.003) in the last year of the trial. Over the full trial period, the EIR did not differ between the four trial arms (p = 0.33). Similar results were observed for the other outcomes: mosquito density and P. falciparum prevalence decreased over 3 years of sampling, while haemoglobin levels increased; and there were minimal differences between the trial arms during the trial period. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of high insecticide-treated bed net use, neither community-based HI, LSM, nor HI + LSM contributed to further reductions in malaria transmission or prevalence beyond the reductions observed over two years across all four trial arms. This was the first trial, as far as the authors are aware, to test the potential complementary impact of LSM and/or HI beyond levels achieved by standard interventions. The unexpectedly low EIR values following intervention implementation indicated a promising reduction in malaria transmission for the area, but also limited the usefulness of this outcome for measuring differences in malaria transmission among the trial arms. Trial registration PACTR, PACTR201604001501493, Registered 3 March 2016, https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/ .
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Current standard interventions are not universally sufficient for malaria elimination. The effects of community-based house improvement (HI) and larval source management (LSM) as supplementary interventions to the Malawi National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) interventions were assessed in the context of an intensive community engagement programme. METHODS: The study was a two-by-two factorial, cluster-randomized controlled trial in Malawi. Village clusters were randomly assigned to four arms: a control arm; HI; LSM; and HI + LSM. Malawi NMCP interventions and community engagement were used in all arms. Household-level, cross-sectional surveys were conducted on a rolling, 2-monthly basis to measure parasitological and entomological outcomes over 3 years, beginning with one baseline year. The primary outcome was the entomological inoculation rate (EIR). Secondary outcomes included mosquito density, Plasmodium falciparum prevalence, and haemoglobin levels. All outcomes were assessed based on intention to treat, and comparisons between trial arms were conducted at both cluster and household level. RESULTS: Eighteen clusters derived from 53 villages with 4558 households and 20,013 people were randomly assigned to the four trial arms. The mean nightly EIR fell from 0.010 infectious bites per person (95% CI 0.006-0.015) in the baseline year to 0.001 (0.000, 0.003) in the last year of the trial. Over the full trial period, the EIR did not differ between the four trial arms (p = 0.33). Similar results were observed for the other outcomes: mosquito density and P. falciparum prevalence decreased over 3 years of sampling, while haemoglobin levels increased; and there were minimal differences between the trial arms during the trial period. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of high insecticide-treated bed net use, neither community-based HI, LSM, nor HI + LSM contributed to further reductions in malaria transmission or prevalence beyond the reductions observed over two years across all four trial arms. This was the first trial, as far as the authors are aware, to test the potential complementary impact of LSM and/or HI beyond levels achieved by standard interventions. The unexpectedly low EIR values following intervention implementation indicated a promising reduction in malaria transmission for the area, but also limited the usefulness of this outcome for measuring differences in malaria transmission among the trial arms. Trial registration PACTR, PACTR201604001501493, Registered 3 March 2016, https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/ .
Entities:
Keywords:
Cluster randomised trial; Community engagement; House improvement; Larval source management; Malaria
Authors: Luigi Sedda; Robert S McCann; Alinune N Kabaghe; Steven Gowelo; Monicah M Mburu; Tinashe A Tizifa; Michael G Chipeta; Henk van den Berg; Willem Takken; Michèle van Vugt; Kamija S Phiri; Russell Cain; Julie-Anne A Tangena; Christopher M Jones Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 7.464
Authors: Tinashe A Tizifa; Alinune N Kabaghe; Robert S McCann; William Nkhono; Spencer Mtengula; Willem Takken; Kamija S Phiri; Michele van Vugt Journal: Malar J Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Kennedy Zembere; James Chirombo; Peter Nasoni; Daniel P McDermott; Lizzie Tchongwe-Divala; Frances M Hawkes; Christopher M Jones Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Mphatso Dennis Phiri; Robert S McCann; Alinune Nathanael Kabaghe; Henk van den Berg; Tumaini Malenga; Steven Gowelo; Tinashe Tizifa; Willem Takken; Michèle van Vugt; Kamija S Phiri; Dianne J Terlouw; Eve Worrall Journal: Malar J Date: 2021-06-13 Impact factor: 2.979