Bianca E Silva1,2, Zvifadzo Matsena Zingoni3, Lizette L Koekemoer1,2, Yael L Dahan-Moss4,5. 1. Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. 2. Centre for Emerging Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa. 3. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, South Africa. 4. Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. yaeld@nicd.ac.za. 5. Centre for Emerging Zoonotic and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute for Communicable Diseases of the National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa. yaeld@nicd.ac.za.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mosquito species from the Anopheles gambiae complex and the Anopheles funestus group are dominant African malaria vectors. Mosquito microbiota play vital roles in physiology and vector competence. Recent research has focused on investigating the mosquito microbiota, especially in wild populations. Wild mosquitoes are preserved and transported to a laboratory for analyses. Thus far, microbial characterization post-preservation has been investigated in only Aedes vexans and Culex pipiens. Investigating the efficacy of cost-effective preservatives has also been limited to AllProtect reagent, ethanol and nucleic acid preservation buffer. This study characterized the microbiota of African Anopheles vectors: Anopheles arabiensis (member of the An. gambiae complex) and An. funestus (member of the An. funestus group), preserved on silica desiccant and RNAlater® solution. METHODS: Microbial composition and diversity were characterized using culture-dependent (midgut dissections, culturomics, MALDI-TOF MS) and culture-independent techniques (abdominal dissections, DNA extraction, next-generation sequencing) from laboratory (colonized) and field-collected mosquitoes. Colonized mosquitoes were either fresh (non-preserved) or preserved for 4 and 12 weeks on silica or in RNAlater®. Microbiota were also characterized from field-collected An. arabiensis preserved on silica for 8, 12 and 16 weeks. RESULTS: Elizabethkingia anophelis and Serratia oryzae were common between both vector species, while Enterobacter cloacae and Staphylococcus epidermidis were specific to females and males, respectively. Microbial diversity was not influenced by sex, condition (fresh or preserved), preservative, or preservation time-period; however, the type of bacterial identification technique affected all microbial diversity indices. CONCLUSIONS: This study broadly characterized the microbiota of An. arabiensis and An. funestus. Silica- and RNAlater®-preservation were appropriate when paired with culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques, respectively. These results broaden the selection of cost-effective methods available for handling vector samples for downstream microbial analyses.
BACKGROUND: Mosquito species from the Anopheles gambiae complex and the Anopheles funestus group are dominant African malaria vectors. Mosquito microbiota play vital roles in physiology and vector competence. Recent research has focused on investigating the mosquito microbiota, especially in wild populations. Wild mosquitoes are preserved and transported to a laboratory for analyses. Thus far, microbial characterization post-preservation has been investigated in only Aedes vexans and Culex pipiens. Investigating the efficacy of cost-effective preservatives has also been limited to AllProtect reagent, ethanol and nucleic acid preservation buffer. This study characterized the microbiota of African Anopheles vectors: Anopheles arabiensis (member of the An. gambiae complex) and An. funestus (member of the An. funestus group), preserved on silica desiccant and RNAlater® solution. METHODS: Microbial composition and diversity were characterized using culture-dependent (midgut dissections, culturomics, MALDI-TOF MS) and culture-independent techniques (abdominal dissections, DNA extraction, next-generation sequencing) from laboratory (colonized) and field-collected mosquitoes. Colonized mosquitoes were either fresh (non-preserved) or preserved for 4 and 12 weeks on silica or in RNAlater®. Microbiota were also characterized from field-collected An. arabiensis preserved on silica for 8, 12 and 16 weeks. RESULTS:Elizabethkingia anophelis and Serratia oryzae were common between both vector species, while Enterobacter cloacae and Staphylococcus epidermidis were specific to females and males, respectively. Microbial diversity was not influenced by sex, condition (fresh or preserved), preservative, or preservation time-period; however, the type of bacterial identification technique affected all microbial diversity indices. CONCLUSIONS: This study broadly characterized the microbiota of An. arabiensis and An. funestus. Silica- and RNAlater®-preservation were appropriate when paired with culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques, respectively. These results broaden the selection of cost-effective methods available for handling vector samples for downstream microbial analyses.
Authors: Anne Boissière; Majoline T Tchioffo; Dipankar Bachar; Luc Abate; Alexandra Marie; Sandrine E Nsango; Hamid R Shahbazkia; Parfait H Awono-Ambene; Elena A Levashina; Richard Christen; Isabelle Morlais Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Ali Reza Chavshin; Mohammad Ali Oshaghi; Hasan Vatandoost; Mohammad Reza Pourmand; Ahmad Raeisi; Olle Terenius Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2014-09-04 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Sally A Saab; Heinrich Zu Dohna; Louise K J Nilsson; Piero Onorati; Johnny Nakhleh; Olle Terenius; Mike A Osta Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Oswald Y Djihinto; Adandé A Medjigbodo; Albert R A Gangbadja; Helga M Saizonou; Hamirath O Lagnika; Dyane Nanmede; Laurette Djossou; Roméo Bohounton; Pierre Marie Sovegnon; Marie-Joel Fanou; Romuald Agonhossou; Romaric Akoton; Wassiyath Mousse; Luc S Djogbénou Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 6.064