| Literature DB >> 34021885 |
Ciro Esposito1, Ernesto Montaruli2, Giuseppe Autorino1, Mario Mendoza-Sagaon2, Maria Escolino3,4.
Abstract
This paper aimed to report a multi-institutional 3-year experience with pediatric endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (PEPSiT) and describe tips and tricks of the technique. We retrospectively reviewed all patients < 18 years, with primary or recurrent pilonidal sinus disease (PSD), undergoing PEPSiT in the period 2017-2020. All patients received pre-operative laser therapy, PEPSiT and post-operative dressing and laser therapy. Success rate, healing rate/time, post-operative management, short- and long-term outcome and patient satisfaction were assessed. A total of 152 patients (98 boys) were included. Median patient's age was 17.1 years. Fifteen/152 patients (9.8%) presented a recurrent PSD. All patients resumed full daily activities 1 day after surgery. The post-operative course was painless in 100% of patients (median VAS pain score < 2/10). Patient satisfaction was excellent (median score 4.8). The median follow-up was 12.8 months (range 1-36). Complete healing in 8 weeks was achieved in 145/152 (95.4%) and the median healing time was 24.6 days (range 16-31). We reported post-operatively immediate Clavien grade 2 complications (3 oedema, 2 burns) in 5/152 (3.3%) and delayed Clavien grade 2 complications (3 granulomas, 8 wound infections) in 11/152 (7.2%). Disease recurrence occurred in 7/152 (4.6%), who were re-operated using PEPSiT. PEPSiT should be considered the standard of care for surgical treatment of PSD in children and teenagers. PEPSiT is technically easy, with short and painless post-operative course and low recurrence rate (4.6%). Standardized treatment protocol, correct patient enrollment and information, and intensive follow-up are key points for the success of the procedure.Entities:
Keywords: Dressing; Fistuloscope; Laser; PEPSiT; Technique; Teenagers
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34021885 PMCID: PMC8606398 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01094-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Updates Surg ISSN: 2038-131X
Fig. 1Communicating pilonidal cyst was reached introducing a clamp (a) or the fistuloscope through the external pit (b, c)
Fig. 2Fistuloscope can be adopted in normal position (a) or in upside down position (b)
Patients’ demographics/baseline
| Patients’ demographics/baseline | Value |
|---|---|
| Number of patients, | 152 |
| Gender male, | 98 |
| M:F | 1.8:1 |
| Median age, years (range) | 17.1 (11–18) |
| Median weight, Kgs (range) | 75.5 (58–105) |
| Comorbidity | |
| Obesity, | 9 (5.9) |
| Ulcerative colitis, | 3 (1.9) |
| Diabetes type 1, | 2 (1.3) |
| Rheumatoid arthritis, | 1 (0.6) |
| Down syndrome, | 1 (0.6) |
| Recurrent PSD, | 15 (9.8) |
| Clinical presentation | |
| Pilonidal fistula, | 129 (84.9) |
| Pilonidal cyst, | 23 (15.1) |
| Median number of orifices, | 2 (1–8) |
| Midline pits, | 144 (94.7) |
| Paramedian pits, | 8 (5.3) |
| Cavity size | |
| Small (1–3 cm), | 79 (52) |
| Medium (3–5 cm), | 33 (22) |
| Large (> 5 cm), | 40 (26) |
| Fitzpatrick skin type | |
| I, | 0 |
| II, | 29 (19.1) |
| III, | 54 (35.5) |
| IV, | 69 (45.4) |
| V, | 0 |
| Hirsutism, | 123 (80.9) |
Fig. 3Wound healing outcome of primary PEPSiT at 1 (a), 7 (b), 14 (c), 21 (d) days postoperatively
Outcomes of our PEPSiT series
| Outcome parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Anesthesia type | |
| Saddle spinal block, | 83 (54.6) |
| Loco-regional anesthesia, | 56 (36.8) |
| General anesthesia, | 13 (8.6) |
| Median operative time, minutes (range) | 28 (18–65) |
| Intra-operative complications, | 0 |
| Median VAS pain score (12 h after surgery) | < 2/10 |
| Median length of stay, hours (range) | 8 (6–24) |
| Median time to full daily activities, days (range) | 1 (0–1) |
| Median follow-up length, months (range) | 12.8 (1–36) |
| Complete healing in 8 weeks, | 145 (95.4) |
| Median healing time, days (range) | 24.6 (16–31) |
| Post-operative complications | |
| 16 (10.5) | |
| Oedema, | 3 (1.9) |
| Fistuloscope burn, | 2 (1.3) |
| Wound infection, | 8 (5.3) |
| Granuloma, | 3 (1.9) |
| Recurrence, | 7 (4.6%) |
| Median patients’ satisfaction score (1–5), | 4.8 (4.2–5) |
Fig. 4Clinical presentations of primary PSD: multiple non secreting median pits (a); multiple secreting median pits (b); pilonidal abscess (c); median and paramedian pits (d)
Fig. 5Clinical presentations of recurrent PSD: multiple median granulomas (a); multiple secreting median pits and paramedian granuloma (b); single non secreting paramedian pit (c); multiple non secreting median pits
Fig. 6Hair removed from the cavity at the end of procedure
Fig. 7Terrible three: too low pit (black arrow) close to the anal orifice (red arrow) (a); too many (b) pits (black arrows); too hairy (c) around the PSD site (black arrow)