Literature DB >> 34021862

Are the Allergic Reactions of COVID-19 Vaccines Caused by mRNA Constructs or Nanocarriers? Immunological Insights.

Gurudeeban Selvaraj1, Satyavani Kaliamurthi2, Gilles H Peslherbe2, Dong-Qing Wei3,4.   

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently authorized the two messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 for emergency use against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing the COVID-19 coronavirus disease. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines were developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, respectively, in 2020. The United Kingdom, Bahrain, Canada, Mexico, United States, Singapore, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and European Union began their vaccination programs with the BNT162b2 vaccine, while the United States and Canada also started the mRNA-1273 vaccination program in mid December 2020. On 28th December 2020, studies reported severe allergic reactions in people who received the BNT162b2, and few people who received the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Authors of the letter thus attempt to explore possible causes of anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaphylaxis; Antibody; BNT162b2; COVID-19; IgE; MRNA vaccine; MRNA-1273; PEG; SARS-CoV-2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34021862      PMCID: PMC8140554          DOI: 10.1007/s12539-021-00438-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interdiscip Sci        ISSN: 1867-1462            Impact factor:   3.492


Dear Editor, The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently authorized the two messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 for emergency use against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing the COVID-19 coronavirus disease. BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines were developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, respectively, in 2020. The United Kingdom, Bahrain, Canada, Mexico, United States, Singapore, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and European Union began their vaccination programs with the BNT162b2 vaccine, while the United States and Canada also started the mRNA-1273 vaccination program in mid December 2020. In the last 2 weeks, we read about the components of these two mRNA vaccines from different media resources. Briefly, the BNT162b2 vaccine contains the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 coding mRNA, 2 [polyethylene glycol (PEG)-2000]-N, N-di-tetradecyl acetamide, 1, 2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, cholesterol, (4-hydroxybutyl) azanediyl) bis (hexane-6, 1-diyl) bis (2-hexyldecanoate), potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dehydrate, and sucrose. COVID-19 patients or volunteers (age > 16) who received BNT162b2 vaccination at 21-day intervals of two dosages (30 μg/dose) attained 95% protection (ClinicalTrials.gov No: NCT04368728) against SARS-CoV-2 [1]. Likewise, mRNA-1273 vaccine components include the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 coding mRNA, PEG 2000 dimyristoyl glycerol, 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, cholesterol, SM-102, tromethamine, tromethamine hydrochloride, acetic acid, sodium acetate, and sucrose. Vaccinated COVID-19 patients or volunteers (age > 18) with mRNA-1273 (2 × 100 μg/dose) in 28 days of interval acquired 94.1% protection (ClinicalTrials.gov No: NCT04470427) against SARS-CoV-2 [2]. The incidence of serious adverse effects of these mRNA vaccines was reported low but included mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. Both candidate vaccines use PEGlyated lipid nanoparticles as a carrier for vaccine delivery, which is administered through intramuscular injection to the patients and volunteers as well. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the mRNA-1273 vaccine included participants (0.6–4.9%) having a history of chronic lung disease, cardiac disease, severe obesity, diabetes, liver disease, and human immunodeficiency virus infection. Moreover, the clinical trials of the BNT162b2 vaccine were conducted with a random selection of participants. On 28th December 2020, Banerji et al. [3] reported severe allergic reactions in some people who received the BNT162b2, and fewer people who received the mRNA-1273 vaccine. In addition, Castells and Phillips [4] noted that severe anaphylaxis reaction was observed in health care workers within 24 h after vaccination in the United Kingdom and Boston, United States [5]. Thus, the National center for immunization and respiratory diseases (NCIRD), Centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) advised health authorities of all countries to exclude anyone with a history of a severe allergic reaction associated with one of the vaccine components, especially PEG and PEG derivatives like polysorbates [6, 7]. Notably, allergens are mostly the proteins or glycoproteins or excipients present in the therapeutic molecules (e.g., vaccines) that promote or stimulate allergen-specific antibodies (i.e., immunoglobulins type E or IgE) in the human body [8]. These allergens react with IgE and cause allergic inflammatory responses. The crosslinking of IgE antibodies that are bound to the Fc epsilon RI (high-affinity IgE receptor) on the basophils and mast cells triggers degranulation in a short period. It results in the release of inflammatory mediators, namely histamine, prostaglandins and leukotrienes, proteases (G-protein-coupled receptors), and pro-inflammatory cytokines; and observation of major allergic symptoms (e.g., nausea, vomiting, reddening, rashes, laryngeal edema, wheezing, tachycardia, hypotension, and cardiovascular collapse) [8]. However, scientific personnel and medical professionals need to determine and understand the possible cause of allergic reactions, whether it by antigenic fragments or epitope (i.e., translated spike glycoprotein fragments) or excipients or stabilizer (PEG) in the vaccine molecules. Glycoprotein-induced anaphylaxis: Many food allergens include egg, fish, milk, shellfish, and tree nuts that contain water-soluble glycoproteins, which are relatively stable to heat, acid, and proteolytic action [9, 10]. To provoke sustained immune response, the immunological (glycoprotein) molecule that binds specifically with the membrane receptor (i.e., antibody IgE) on T or B cell is known as an epitope. This epitope may be a linear (stable) or conformational (less stable) epitope. The linear epitopes are formed by the three-dimensional conformation adopted by the IgE paratope interaction of contiguous amino acid residues. Then, the IgE–allergen complex that binds with the receptor on mast cells or basophils causes allergic reactions such as the release of histamine, prostaglandins, and leukotrienes, proteases [11]. From the immunological point of view, after vaccination, these mRNA vaccines enter into the human cells and are translated into protein fragments (especially spike glycoprotein), which they present to the surface and are recognized by the human immune cells (e.g., APC—antigen-presenting cells). The APC present these spike protein fragments (epitopes) through MHC-II molecules on its surface. Further, the MHC-II–epitope complex was identified by the T helper cell receptor, which can raise the alarm and trigger the T helper cells-mediated immune response to release interleukins [12]. It involves the activation of allergen-specific B cells and the production of IgE antibodies (Fig. 1). Notably, nucleoside-modified mRNA (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) translated into fragments of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2, which possibly contains water-soluble glycoprotein fragments (allergen), triggers anaphylaxis reaction in some of the vaccinated individuals.
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of possible mechanism of anaphylaxis reaction after mRNA vaccination for COVID-19

Schematic representation of possible mechanism of anaphylaxis reaction after mRNA vaccination for COVID-19 Stabilizer-induced anaphylaxis: BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines contain two different stabilizing agents such as sucrose and PEG. In general, carbohydrate (sucrose) intolerance does not disturb the immune system and it may cause common allergic reactions, namely gastrointestinal disturbance. Another stabilizer PEG is non-toxic approved by the FDA in 1990. PEG is commonly used for surface components of lipid nanoparticles reported to have higher stability, circulation half-life, and reduced immunogenicity [13]. In general, mRNAs are short and easily degraded by the natural enzymes in the human body. Thus, the two vaccines included PEG–lipid nanoparticles coating to protect the mRNA in the circulation in the human body. Besides, studies of PEG encapsulated nanomedicine reportedly can cause pseudo-allergic reactions in experimental models [14, 15]. Similarly, after endocytosis, the mRNA free PEG in lipid nanoparticles floating on the cell surface interact with IgE antibodies (i.e. allergen) that bind into the FcƐR1 receptor on mast cells or basophils and can trigger immediate release of inflammatory and pro-inflammatory mediators that include histamine, prostaglandins, and proteases. Usually, the anaphylaxis signs and symptoms appear within a few minutes to one hour after exposure to allergic substances or antigens in the vaccine (Fig. 1). The spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 contains key regions that include the receptor-binding domain (RBD), integrin-binding motif, an RB motif that binds to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2B), two fusion peptides, and two heptad repeats. The spike glycoprotein (P0DTC2) sequence was retrieved from the Uniprot database. Allergenicity of the spike protein key regions was computationally predicted using two different tools AllerTOP v. 2.0 and AllergenFP v.1.0, which are effectively used for subunit vaccine design [16, 17]. The results from AllerTOP indicate that the RBD, receptor-binding motif, binding to human ACE2B (437–508), and two fusion peptides could be a probable allergen, while the results from both tools point to the receptor-binding motif of the spike protein to the host receptor ACE2B as a very probable allergen (Table 1). These results suggest that spike protein-based medication possibly induces an allergic reaction in the host system, likely due to the amino acid residues 437–508 sequence.
Table 1

Allergenicity prediction of key regions of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2

Key regions of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2Position (s)AllerTOP v. 2.0AllergenFP v.1.0
Receptor-binding domain (RBD)319–541AllergenNon-allergen
Integrin-binding motif403–405Non-allergenNon-allergen
Receptor-binding motif, binding to human ACE2B437–508AllergenAllergen
Fusion peptide 1816–837AllergenNon-allergen
Fusion peptide 2835–855AllergenNon-allergen
Heptad repeat 1920–970Non-allergenNon-allergen
Heptad repeat 21163–1202Non-allergenNon-allergen
Allergenicity prediction of key regions of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 Moreover, spike protein key substitutions (L452R and E484K) have been reported in identified variants of SARS-CoV-2. The L452R substitutions were reported in B.1.526.1, B.1.427, and B.1.429 variants and E484K reported in variants B.1.525, P.2, P.1, and B.1.351 (large number of patients) and B.1.526 and B.1.1.7 (minimal number of patients) [18]. These reports indicate that amino acid residues (437–508) of the spike protein may cause possible anaphylaxis, which needs to be further investigated in COVID-19 prophylactic or therapeutic drug or vaccine development. Further, the cohort study by the University of Oxford reported that two mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273) and the AstraZeneca vaccine possibly cause cerebral venous thrombosis (i.e., anaphylaxis reaction) after 14 days of vaccination [19]. The mechanism of action was not reported in the article but there is a chance that spike proteins may elicit anaphylaxis reaction because of the major similarity of these vaccines is the presence of “spike protein immunogen”. At present, vaccination programs have been initiated concurrently against COVID-19, but the debate is still going about the adverse effects and safety concerns raised by the vaccine. Moreover, the allergic reactions of the participants need to be identified or screened frequently by questionnaires and IgE testing before and after vaccination to monitor unpleasant adverse effects of the vaccine. In this concern, promising research outputs are needed to confirm the safety of the currently formulated mRNA vaccines.
  14 in total

1.  Food-induced anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Antonella Cianferoni; Antonella Muraro
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 2.  Evolutionary biology of plant food allergens.

Authors:  Christian Radauer; Heimo Breiteneder
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  AllergenFP: allergenicity prediction by descriptor fingerprints.

Authors:  Ivan Dimitrov; Lyudmila Naneva; Irini Doytchinova; Ivan Bangov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Pseudo-anaphylaxis to Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-Coated Liposomes: Roles of Anti-PEG IgM and Complement Activation in a Porcine Model of Human Infusion Reactions.

Authors:  Gergely Tibor Kozma; Tamás Mészáros; Ildikó Vashegyi; Tamás Fülöp; Erik Örfi; László Dézsi; László Rosivall; Yaelle Bavli; Rudolf Urbanics; Tom Eirik Mollnes; Yechezkel Barenholz; János Szebeni
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Allergic reactions to the first COVID-19 vaccine: A potential role of polyethylene glycol?

Authors:  Beatriz Cabanillas; Cezmi A Akdis; Natalija Novak
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 13.146

6.  Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Fernando P Polack; Stephen J Thomas; Nicholas Kitchin; Judith Absalon; Alejandra Gurtman; Stephen Lockhart; John L Perez; Gonzalo Pérez Marc; Edson D Moreira; Cristiano Zerbini; Ruth Bailey; Kena A Swanson; Satrajit Roychoudhury; Kenneth Koury; Ping Li; Warren V Kalina; David Cooper; Robert W Frenck; Laura L Hammitt; Özlem Türeci; Haylene Nell; Axel Schaefer; Serhat Ünal; Dina B Tresnan; Susan Mather; Philip R Dormitzer; Uğur Şahin; Kathrin U Jansen; William C Gruber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  mRNA Vaccines to Prevent COVID-19 Disease and Reported Allergic Reactions: Current Evidence and Suggested Approach.

Authors:  Aleena Banerji; Paige G Wickner; Rebecca Saff; Cosby A Stone; Lacey B Robinson; Aidan A Long; Anna R Wolfson; Paul Williams; David A Khan; Elizabeth Phillips; Kimberly G Blumenthal
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-12-31

Review 8.  Maintaining Safety with SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines.

Authors:  Mariana C Castells; Elizabeth J Phillips
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Polyethylene Glycol-Induced Systemic Allergic Reactions (Anaphylaxis).

Authors:  Priya Sellaturay; Shuaib Nasser; Pamela Ewan
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2020-10-01

10.  The effects of PEGylation on LNP based mRNA delivery to the eye.

Authors:  Renee C Ryals; Siddharth Patel; Chris Acosta; Madison McKinney; Mark E Pennesi; Gaurav Sahay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  To PEGylate or not to PEGylate: Immunological properties of nanomedicine's most popular component, polyethylene glycol and its alternatives.

Authors:  Da Shi; Damian Beasock; Adam Fessler; Janos Szebeni; Julia Y Ljubimova; Kirill A Afonin; Marina A Dobrovolskaia
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Design, construction and in vivo functional assessment of a hinge truncated sFLT01.

Authors:  Fahimeh Zakeri; Hamid Latifi-Navid; Zahra-Soheila Soheili; Mehdi Sadeghi; Seyed Shahriar Arab; Shahram Samiei; Ehsan Ranaei Pirmardan; Sepideh Taghizadeh; Hamid Ahmadieh; Ali Hafezi-Moghadam
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.184

Review 3.  Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions Induced by COVID-19 Vaccines: Current Trends, Potential Mechanisms and Prevention Strategies.

Authors:  Shuen-Iu Hung; Ivan Arni C Preclaro; Wen-Hung Chung; Chuang-Wei Wang
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-28

4.  New Onset of Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Following mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccine.

Authors:  Emanuele Nappi; Maria De Santis; Giovanni Paoletti; Corrado Pelaia; Fabrizia Terenghi; Daniela Pini; Michele Ciccarelli; Carlo Francesco Selmi; Francesca Puggioni; Giorgio Walter Canonica; Enrico Heffler
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 5.  The intestinal microbiota and improving the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations.

Authors:  Jiezhong Chen; Luis Vitetta; Jeremy D Henson; Sean Hall
Journal:  J Funct Foods       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.451

Review 6.  Current Evidence in SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines and Post-Vaccination Adverse Reports: Knowns and Unknowns.

Authors:  Dimitra S Mouliou; Efthimios Dardiotis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-26

Review 7.  Immune Response in Regard to Hypersensitivity Reactions after COVID-19 Vaccination.

Authors:  Ming-Hsiu Hsieh; Yukie Yamaguchi
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.