| Literature DB >> 34021486 |
Shun Watanabe1, Naoki Sawa2, Hiroki Mizuno2, Masayuki Yamanouchi2, Tatsuya Suwabe2, Junichi Hoshino2,3, Keiichi Kinowaki4, Kenichi Ohashi4,5, Takeshi Fujii4, Yutaka Yamaguchi6, Yoshifumi Ubara2,3.
Abstract
We encountered 3 cases of acute kidney injury that occurred after treatment with a SGLT2 inhibitor. In case 1, serum creatinine increased from 1.65 to 3.0 mg/dL, in case 2, serum creatinine increased from 1.03 to 1.21 mg/dL, and in case 3, serum creatinine increased from 0.8 to 1.1 mg/dL. Renal biopsy showed isometric vacuolization on tubules, that was completely negative for Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain in case 1, and was partially negative for PAS stain in case 2 and 3, consistent with osmotic vacuolization. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positive staining for CD138 and CD10 indicating the proximal tubules in the vacuolar lesions. 3 patients were obese with body mass index of more than 30, and showed an increase in serum renin. In conclusion, in type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM), individuals that remain within their standard weight range, SGLT2 inhibitor treatment does not result in osmotic vacuolization of proximal tubular epithelial cells and AKI. However, treatment with a SGLT2 inhibitor may cause damage of the proximal tubules resulting in AKI in T2DM individuals who do not remain within their standard weight range, due to an overdose lavage of sugar in the urine and dehydration.Entities:
Keywords: Acute kidney injury (AKI); Isometric vacuolization; Osmotic vacuolization; Proximal tubules; Sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2); Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34021486 PMCID: PMC8494847 DOI: 10.1007/s13730-021-00609-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: CEN Case Rep ISSN: 2192-4449
Staining for common antigens of tubules
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CD138 | Proximal convoluted tubule | + | + | + |
| CD10 | Proximal convoluted tubule and proximal straight renal tubule | + | + | + |
| E-cadherin | Henle loop, thick ascending limb, macula densa, distal convoluted tubule and collecting duct | − | − | − |
| EMA | Henle loop, thick ascending limb, macula densa, distal convoluted tubule and collecting duct | − | − | − |
| CK7 | Henle loop, thick ascending limb and distal convoluted tubule | − | − | − |
| CK34βE12 | Collecting duct | − | − | − |
(+) shows positive staining, and (−) shows negative staining for EMA, epithelial membrane antigen; CK7, cytokeratin 7; CK34βE12, cytokeratin 34 beta E12
Laboratory findings on patient admission
| Normal range | Case.1 | Case.2 | Case.3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | (year-old) | 41 | 55 | 52 | |
| Weight (before) | 84 | 88 | 80 | ||
| Weight (on admissin) | (kg) | 93 | 95.8 | 82 | |
| Hight | (cm) | 162 | 169 | 164.5 | |
| BMI | 35.4366712 | 33.5422429 | 30.3027503 | ||
| Blood pressure | (mmHJg) | 128/76 | 130/75 | 122/74 | |
| Duration of diabetes | (years) | 7 | 5 | 17 | |
| type of SGLT2i | Dapagliflozin | Dapagliflozin | Dapagliflozin | ||
| Prescription period of SGLT2i | (month) | 19 | 24 | 5 | |
| OHA (the others) | Biguanide | ○ | ○ | ||
| DPP-4 inhibitor | ○ | ○ | ○ | ||
| SU | ○ | ○ | |||
| Glinide | |||||
| Pioglitazone | ○ | ||||
| αGI | |||||
| Hypertension | ○ | ○ | ○ | ||
| Dyslipidemia | ○ | ○ | ○ | ||
| Hyperuricemia | ○ | ○ | |||
| Blood test | |||||
| HbA1c | (%) | 6.1 | 6.5 | 7.4 | |
| Blood sugar | (mg/dl) | 74 | 86 | 108 | |
| TP | (g/dl) | 7.7 | 6.7 | 8.0 | |
| Alb | (g/dl) | 4.9 | 4 | 5.0 | |
| AST | (IU/l) | 15 | 15 | 29 | |
| ALT | (IU/l) | 24 | 20 | 37 | |
| LD | (IU/l) | 138 | 133 | 175 | |
| ALP | (IU/l) | 166 | 137 | 213 | |
| γGTP | (IU/l) | 36 | 25 | 296 | |
| UN | (mg/dl) | 28 | 15 | 16 | |
| Cre (before) | (mg/dL) | 1.65 | 1 | 0.8 | |
| Cre (after) | (mg/dl) | 3.02 | 1.2 | 1.1 | |
| eGFR (before) | (ml/min/m2) | 36.7 | 59.5 | 79.7 | |
| eGFR (after) | (ml/min/m2) | 19.9 | 55.3 | 74.6 | |
| UA | (mg/dl) | 5.4 | 6 | 8.7 | |
| Na | (mEq/l) | 141 | 144 | 138 | |
| K | (mEq/l) | 3.6 | 4.3 | 4.2 | |
| Cl | (mEq/l) | 100 | 109 | 100 | |
| Ca | (mg/dl) | 9.4 | 9.4 | 9.9 | |
| IP | (mg/dl) | 4.1 | 3.2 | 3 | |
| T-Bil | (mg/dl) | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | |
| D-Bil | (mg/dl) | 0.2 | |||
| TG | (mg/dl) | 263 | 170 | 545 | |
| T-Chol | (mg/dl) | 139 | 149 | 240 | |
| HDL-Chol | (mg/dl) | 36 | 37 | 44 | |
| LDL-Chol | (mg/dl) | 74 | 78 | 115 | |
| CRP | (mg/dl) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.05 | |
| WBC | (/μl) | 8500 | 8300 | 7300 | |
| RBC | (× 104/μl) | 618 | 535 | 487 | |
| Hb | (g/dl) | 17.8 | 15.2 | 14.9 | |
| Hct | (%) | 52.9 | 45.8 | 44.4 | |
| Plt | (× 104/μl) | 24.6 | 22.4 | 31.6 | |
| Renin activity | ng/ml/hr | 0.3-2.9 | 8.8 | 36.8 | |
| Renin concentration | pg/mL | 2.5-21.4 | 53.8 | ||
| Urinalysis | |||||
| Specific gravity | 1.026 | 1.034 | 1.028 | ||
| pH | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5 | ||
| Urinaly glucose | (mg/dl) | 2366 | (4+) | 3002 | |
| (g/day) | 18.928 | N/A | 58.5 | ||
| Protein | (g/day) | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.08 | |
| Ketone | – | – | – | ||
BMI body mass index, SGLT2i sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor, OHA oral hyperglycemic agent, DPP4 Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4, SU sulfonylurea, αGI α-glucosidase inhibitor, TP total protein, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine transaminase, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, ALP alkaline phosphatase, γ-GTP γ-glutamyl transferase, UN urea nitrogen, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration ratio, UA uric acid, TG triglyceride, HDL high density lipoprotein, LDL low density lipoprotein; CRP, C-reactive protein
Fig. 1a LM analysis of a renal biopsy specimen of case 1 shows that proximal tubule is vacuolated (arrows) (Hematoxylin–Eosin stain, Periodic Acid Schiff stain and CD10 stain 400 ×). Brown color shows positivity for CD 10 stain, consistent with proximal tubule). EM analysis revealed round or elliptical vacuolization as confirmed on proximal tubules. b LM analysis of a renal biopsy specimen of case 2 shows that proximal tubule is vacuolated (arrows) (Hematoxylin–Eosin stain, Periodic Acid Schiff stain and CD10 stain 400 ×). Brown color shows positivity for CD 10 stain, consistent with proximal tubule).EM analysis showed round or elliptical vacuolization as confirmed on proximal tubules. c LM analysis of a renal biopsy specimen of case 3 showed that proximal tubule is vacuolated (arrows) (Hematoxylin–Eosin stain,, Periodic Acid Schiff stain and CD10 stain 400 ×). Brown color shows positivity for CD 10 stain, consistent with proximal tubule). EM analysis showed curved stripe-formed vacuolization as confirmed on proximal tubules