Literature DB >> 34021423

Comparison of hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with gait analysis and surface electromyography.

J Schagemann1, T Koebrich2, R Wendlandt3, A P Schulz2,3,4, J Gille2,4, R Oheim2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is the most frequent ligamentous injury of the knee joint. Autografts of hamstring (HS) or quadriceps tendons (QT) are used for primary ACL reconstruction. In this study, we planned to examine whether harvesting an HS graft is related to a deficit in dynamic knee stabilisation and strength revealed by dynamic valgus as compared with QT graft or the uninjured leg. Furthermore, if this deficit exists, is it compensated by higher neuromuscular activity of the quadriceps muscle?
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction with QT or HS autografts were included in this two-armed cohort study. Clinical outcome was assessed by clinical data analysis, physical examination and the Lysholm Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS). In addition, gait analysis and non-invasive surface electromyography were performed.
RESULTS: A complete data set of 25 patients (QT: N = 8, HS: N = 17) was analysed. There was no significant demographic difference between the groups. Time between surgery and follow-up was significantly longer for the QT group. Significant differences regarding clinical outcome were not found between the treated and untreated leg or between the two groups, with excellent scores at the time of follow-up. Gait analysis revealed no significant differences of varus-valgus angles. Significant differences in surface electromyography were only found in the QT group with increased vastus medialis obliquus activity of the treated legs (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that harvesting of HS grafts for primary ACL reconstruction will not lead to a medial collapse and consequently impaired medial stabilisation of the knee when compared with QT grafts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Gait analysis; Hamstring graft; Quadriceps tendon graft; Surface electromyography

Year:  2021        PMID: 34021423     DOI: 10.1186/s10195-021-00581-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 1590-9921


  39 in total

1.  Why autologous hamstring tendon reconstruction should now be considered the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes.

Authors:  L Pinczewski; J Roe; L Salmon
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  A prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of patellar tendon and quadruple-strand semitendinosus/gracilis tendons fixed with bioabsorbable interference screws.

Authors:  Gregory B Maletis; Sheri L Cameron; Joann J Tengan; Raoul J Burchette
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Outcomes of Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone-Quadriceps Tendon Graft Versus Double-Bundle Hamstring Tendon Graft.

Authors:  Joon Kyu Lee; Sahnghoon Lee; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Trends and incidences of ligament-surgeries and osteotomies of the knee: an analysis of German inpatient records 2005-2013.

Authors:  Christoph Domnick; Patric Garcia; Michael J Raschke; Johannes Glasbrenner; Georg Lodde; Christian Fink; Mirco Herbort
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Should the Ipsilateral Hamstrings Be Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Case of Medial Collateral Ligament Insufficiency? Biomechanical Investigation Regarding Dynamic Stabilization of the Medial Compartment by the Hamstring Muscles.

Authors:  Mirco Herbort; Philipp Michel; Michael J Raschke; Nils Vogel; Martin Schulze; Alexander Zoll; Christian Fink; Wolf Petersen; Christoph Domnick
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Knee extension and flexion muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft or hamstring tendons graft: a cross-sectional comparison 3 years post surgery.

Authors:  Eva Ageberg; Harald P Roos; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Roland Thomeé; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Return to play following ACL reconstruction: survey among experienced arthroscopic surgeons (AGA instructors).

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Thore Zantop
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons.

Authors:  K Yasuda; J Tsujino; Y Ohkoshi; Y Tanabe; K Kaneda
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 9.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: A review of graft choice.

Authors:  Daniel A Shaerf; Philip S Pastides; Khaled M Sarraf; Charles A Willis-Owen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-01-18

Review 10.  Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Abrams; Joshua D Harris; Anil K Gupta; Frank M McCormick; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.