Literature DB >> 34021240

Collagen analogs with phosphorylcholine are inflammation-suppressing scaffolds for corneal regeneration from alkali burns in mini-pigs.

Fiona C Simpson1,2,3,4, Christopher D McTiernan5, Mohammad Mirazul Islam6, Oleksiy Buznyk7,8, Philip N Lewis9, Keith M Meek9, Michel Haagdorens10, Cindy Audiger1,11, Sylvie Lesage1,11, François-Xavier Gueriot1,12, Isabelle Brunette1,2, Marie-Claude Robert1,4, David Olsen13, Laura Koivusalo14, Aneta Liszka7, Per Fagerholm15, Miguel Gonzalez-Andrades16,17, May Griffith18,19,20,21.   

Abstract

The long-term survival of biomaterial implants is often hampered by surgery-induced inflammation that can lead to graft failure. Considering that most corneas receiving grafts are either pathological or inflamed before implantation, the risk of rejection is heightened. Here, we show that bioengineered, fully synthetic, and robust corneal implants can be manufactured from a collagen analog (collagen-like peptide-polyethylene glycol hybrid, CLP-PEG) and inflammation-suppressing polymeric 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) when stabilized with the triazine-based crosslinker 4-(4,6-Dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholinium chloride. The resulting CLP-PEG-MPC implants led to reduced corneal swelling, haze, and neovascularization in comparison to CLP-PEG only implants when grafted into a mini-pig cornea alkali burn model of inflammation over 12 months. Implants incorporating MPC allowed for faster nerve regeneration and recovery of corneal sensation. CLP-PEG-MPC implants appear to be at a more advanced stage of regeneration than the CLP-PEG only implants, as evidenced by the presence of higher amounts of cornea-specific type V collagen, and a corresponding decrease in the presence of extracellular vesicles and exosomes in the corneal stroma, in keeping with the amounts present in healthy, unoperated corneas.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34021240     DOI: 10.1038/s42003-021-02108-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Biol        ISSN: 2399-3642


  35 in total

1.  Mechanisms of corneal allograft rejection and regional immunosuppression.

Authors:  D J Coster; C F Jessup; K A Williams
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Characterization of retrokeratoprosthetic membranes in the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Rebecca C Stacy; Frederick A Jakobiec; Norman A Michaud; Claes H Dohlman; Kathryn A Colby
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03

Review 3.  Management of high-risk corneal transplantation.

Authors:  Antonio Di Zazzo; Ahmad Kheirkhah; Tulio B Abud; Sunali Goyal; Reza Dana
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  How effective is penetrating corneal transplantation? Factors influencing long-term outcome in multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Keryn A Williams; Adrian J Esterman; Christine Bartlett; Helene Holland; Ngaere B Hornsby; Douglas J Coster
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  A review of corneal melting after Boston Keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Robert; Claes H Dohlman
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.975

6.  Characterization of topographical effects on macrophage behavior in a foreign body response model.

Authors:  Sulin Chen; Jacqueline A Jones; Yongan Xu; Hong-Yee Low; James M Anderson; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Biomaterial surface chemistry dictates adherent monocyte/macrophage cytokine expression in vitro.

Authors:  W G Brodbeck; Y Nakayama; T Matsuda; E Colton; N P Ziats; J M Anderson
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 3.861

Review 8.  Inflammatory triggers of acute rejection of organ allografts.

Authors:  Daniel N Mori; Daniel Kreisel; James N Fullerton; Derek W Gilroy; Daniel R Goldstein
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 12.988

9.  Global Survey of Corneal Transplantation and Eye Banking.

Authors:  Philippe Gain; Rémy Jullienne; Zhiguo He; Mansour Aldossary; Sophie Acquart; Fabrice Cognasse; Gilles Thuret
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 7.389

Review 10.  Turning the tide of corneal blindness.

Authors:  Matthew S Oliva; Tim Schottman; Manoj Gulati
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  3 in total

1.  In Situ-Forming Collagen-Hyaluronate Semi-Interpenetrating Network Hydrogel Enhances Corneal Defect Repair.

Authors:  Fang Chen; David C Mundy; Peter Le; Youngyoon Amy Seo; Caitlin M Logan; Gabriella Maria Fernandes-Cunha; Chris A Basco; David Myung
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.048

2.  A Light-Curable and Tunable Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel for In Situ Suture-Free Corneal Repair.

Authors:  Ghasem Yazdanpanah; Xiang Shen; Tara Nguyen; Khandaker N Anwar; Oju Jeon; Yizhou Jiang; Mohammad Pachenari; Yayue Pan; Tolou Shokuhfar; Mark I Rosenblatt; Eben Alsberg; Ali R Djalilian
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 19.924

3.  Cardiomyogenic Differentiation Potential of Human Dilated Myocardium-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells: The Impact of HDAC Inhibitor SAHA and Biomimetic Matrices.

Authors:  Rokas Miksiunas; Ruta Aldonyte; Agne Vailionyte; Tadas Jelinskas; Romuald Eimont; Gintare Stankeviciene; Vytautas Cepla; Ramunas Valiokas; Kestutis Rucinskas; Vilius Janusauskas; Siegfried Labeit; Daiva Bironaite
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.