Literature DB >> 34021061

Characterisation of vaping liquids used in vaping devices across four countries: results from an analysis of selected vaping liquids reported by users in the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Brian Vincent Fix1, Richard J OConnor2, Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz2, Noel L Leigh2, Michael Cummings3, Sara C Hitchman4, Geoffrey T Fong5,6, Georges El Nahas7, David Hammond8, Ann McNeill9, Ron Borland10, Bill King11, Mary N Palumbo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study presents an analysis of vaping products (VPs) purchased in the USA, Canada, England and Australia and assesses whether differences in regulations were associated with differences in the chemical composition of the VPs.
METHODS: April-September 2017, a total of 234 VP refill liquids and prefilled cartridges were purchased in convenience samples of retail locations in each country. Products were chosen from brands and styles most commonly reported by current VP users in the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. All products were tested for nicotine, tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), minor tobacco alkaloids, organic acids and flavouring chemicals.
RESULTS: Consistent with the laws in Canada and Australia at the time of product purchase, nicotine was not detected in any of the VPs (n=10 in Canada; n=15 in Australia). US liquids (n=54) had a mean nicotine concentration of 16.2 mg/mL, (range=0.0-58.6) and English liquids (n=166) had a mean concentration of 11.9 mg/mL ((range=0.0-31.2) F(3244)=12.32, p<0.001). About 5% of English samples exceeded the UK's 20 mg/mL nicotine limit. Substantial country differences were observed in levels ofTSNAs, with the USA being higher than elsewhere. Of all products tested, 18.8% contained at least one organic acid. Liquids purchased in England contained far more identifiable flavouring chemicals than those in the other countries.
CONCLUSIONS: VP composition, particularly with respect to nicotine and flavouring, varies by country, likely reflecting both marketplace preferences and country-specific regulations. There are differences between nicotine levels claimed on the package and actual levels, particularly in England. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic nicotine delivery devices; nicotine; public policy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34021061      PMCID: PMC9326900          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   6.953


  23 in total

Review 1.  A consideration of the role of gas/particle partitioning in the deposition of nicotine and other tobacco smoke compounds in the respiratory tract.

Authors:  J F Pankow
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  E-cigarette nicotine content and labelling practices in a restricted market: Findings from Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Christine D Czoli; Maciej L Goniewicz; Mary Palumbo; Christine M White; David Hammond
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2018-05-04

Review 3.  Industry research on the use and effects of levulinic acid: a case study in cigarette additives.

Authors:  Lois Keithly; Geoffrey Ferris Wayne; Doris M Cullen; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Characteristics of nicotine vaping products used by participants in the 2016 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Brian V Fix; Ann McNeill; Maciej L Goniewicz; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Bryan W Heckman; K Michael Cummings; Sara Hitchman; Ron Borland; David Hammond; David Levy; Shannon Gravely; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Comparison of electronic cigarette refill fluid cytotoxicity using embryonic and adult models.

Authors:  Vasundhra Bahl; Sabrina Lin; Nicole Xu; Barbara Davis; Yu-huan Wang; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Cherry-flavoured electronic cigarettes expose users to the inhalation irritant, benzaldehyde.

Authors:  Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Adam Prokopowicz; Jolanta Kurek; Marzena Zaciera; Jakub Knysak; Danielle Smith; Maciej L Goniewicz
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Prevalence of vaping and smoking among adolescents in Canada, England, and the United States: repeat national cross sectional surveys.

Authors:  David Hammond; Jessica L Reid; Vicki L Rynard; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; Sara Hitchman; James F Thrasher; Maciej L Goniewicz; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Richard O'Connor; David Levy; Ron Borland; Christine M White
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-06-20

Review 8.  Nearly 20 000 e-liquids and 250 unique flavour descriptions: an overview of the Dutch market based on information from manufacturers.

Authors:  Anne Havermans; Erna J Z Krüsemann; Jeroen Pennings; Kees de Graaf; Sanne Boesveldt; Reinskje Talhout
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Evaluation of e-liquid toxicity using an open-source high-throughput screening assay.

Authors:  M Flori Sassano; Eric S Davis; James E Keating; Bryan T Zorn; Tavleen K Kochar; Matthew C Wolfgang; Gary L Glish; Robert Tarran
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Triacetin Enhances Levels of Acrolein, Formaldehyde Hemiacetals, and Acetaldehyde in Electronic Cigarette Aerosols.

Authors:  Shawna Vreeke; David H Peyton; Robert M Strongin
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-07-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.