Paolo Dell'Oglio1, Iulia Andras2, David Ortega3, Antonio Galfano4, Walter Artibani5, Riccardo Autorino6, Elio Mazzone7, Nicolae Crisan2, Aldo Massimo Bocciardi4, Rafael Sanchez-Salas8, Inderbir Gill3, Peter Wiklund9, Mihir Desai3, Dionysios Mitropoulos10, Alexandre Mottrie11, Giovanni E Cacciamani12. 1. Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: paolo.delloglio@gmail.com. 2. Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. 3. University of Southern California Institute of Urology & Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy. 5. Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. 6. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, VCU Health System, Richmond, VA, USA. 7. Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy. 8. Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France. 9. Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 10. 1st Department of Urology, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece. 11. Department of Urology, Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium. 12. University of Southern California Institute of Urology & Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: giovanni.cacciamani@med.usc.edu.
Abstract
In 2012, the European Association of Urology (EAU) Ad Hoc Panel proposed a standardised methodology on reporting and grading complications after urological surgical procedures. The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of this implementation on complications reporting for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). A systematic review of all English-language original articles published on RARC until March 2020 was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The study selection process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The quality of reporting and grading complication was evaluated according to the EAU recommendations. Our analysis failed to observe a statistically significant improvement in reporting outcomes after the EAU guidelines recommendations except for three of the 14 criteria proposed (ie, follow-up duration, utilisation of a severity grade system, and risk factors included in the analyses). A lower statistically significant adherence to outcome reporting in terms of inclusion of readmissions and causes (p = 0.02), was observed. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we evaluated the impact of the proposed European Association of Urology (EAU) standardised reporting tool for urological complications, in patients treated with robot-assisted radical cystectomy. A low adherence to EAU guidelines recommendations for complications reporting was observed.
In 2012, the European Association of Urology (EAU) Ad Hoc Panel proposed a standardised methodology on reporting and grading complications after urological surgical procedures. The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of this implementation on complications reporting for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). A systematic review of all English-language original articles published on RARC until March 2020 was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The study selection process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The quality of reporting and grading complication was evaluated according to the EAU recommendations. Our analysis failed to observe a statistically significant improvement in reporting outcomes after the EAU guidelines recommendations except for three of the 14 criteria proposed (ie, follow-up duration, utilisation of a severity grade system, and risk factors included in the analyses). A lower statistically significant adherence to outcome reporting in terms of inclusion of readmissions and causes (p = 0.02), was observed. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we evaluated the impact of the proposed European Association of Urology (EAU) standardised reporting tool for urological complications, in patients treated with robot-assisted radical cystectomy. A low adherence to EAU guidelines recommendations for complications reporting was observed.
Authors: Amandeep Arora; Ahmed S Zugail; Felipe Pugliesi; Xavier Cathelineau; Petr Macek; Yann Barbé; R Jeffrey Karnes; Mohamed Ahmed; Ettore Di Trapani; Francesco Soria; Mario Alvarez-Maestro; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Andrea Necchi; Benjamin Pradere; David D'Andrea; Wojciech Krajewski; Mathieu Roumiguié; Anne Sophie Bajeot; Rodolfo Hurle; Roberto Contieri; Roberto Carando; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Morgan Roupret; Daniel Benamran; Guillaume Ploussard; M Carmen Mir; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Marco Moschini Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-04-30 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Paolo Dell'Oglio; Stefano Tappero; Mattia Longoni; Carlo Buratto; Pietro Scilipoti; Silvia Secco; Alberto Olivero; Michele Barbieri; Erika Palagonia; Giancarlo Napoli; Elena Strada; Giovanni Petralia; Dario Di Trapani; Angelo Vanzulli; Aldo Massimo Bocciardi; Antonio Galfano Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2022-03-04
Authors: Carl J Wijburg; Gerjon Hannink; Charlotte T J Michels; Philip C Weijerman; Rami Issa; Andrea Tay; Karel Decaestecker; Peter Wiklund; Abolfazl Hosseini; Ashwin Sridhar; John Kelly; Frederiek d'Hondt; Alexandre Mottrie; Sjoerd Klaver; Sebastian Edeling; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Francesco Montorsi; Maroeska M Rovers; J Alfred Witjes Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Date: 2022-04-02
Authors: Michael Eppler; Aref S Sayegh; Mitchell Goldenberg; Tamir Sholklapper; Sij Hemal; Giovanni E Cacciamani Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-08-25 Impact factor: 4.964