Literature DB >> 34020815

Sex differences in the incidence of anaphylaxis to LNP-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Masaharu Somiya1, Sohtaro Mine2, Kosuke Yasukawa3, Saki Ikeda4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaphylaxis; COVID-19; Sex difference; mRNA vaccine

Year:  2021        PMID: 34020815      PMCID: PMC8101867          DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


× No keyword cloud information.
On February 17, 2021, Japan started vaccinating healthcare workers with the Pfizer-BioNTech lipid nanoparticle (LNP)-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Among total 79 anaphylaxis cases, 70 cases have been reported in women (89.9%) after 1,096,698 doses of the vaccine until April 4, 2021 [1]. Since the initiation of COVID-19 mass vaccination globally, there have been reported cases of anaphylaxis associated with Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna LNP-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Recent surveillance data in the US reported 66 cases of anaphylaxis after administering  > 17 million doses of the two LNP-mRNA vaccines between December 14, 2020, and January 18, 2021 [2], with a striking female predominance (95.4%) in the reported cases of vaccine-associated anaphylaxis. According to the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 63% of the vaccinations were administered to women until January 14. Another report confirmed the female predominance of anaphylaxis cases in over 60,000 doses of LNP-mRNA vaccinations; 15 (94%) of the 16 confirmed cases were women [3]. According to EudraVigilance, a reporting system of suspected adverse drug reaction in the EU, 88.1% of anaphylaxis cases (including both anaphylactic reaction and anaphylactic shock) after administering Pfizer-BioNTech LNP-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines was found in women (as of April 10, 2021) [4]. Although vaccine-associated anaphylaxis is known to be slightly more common in women [5], this sexual disproportion is quite notable with LNP-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The surveillance data strongly suggest that women are more prone to anaphylaxis to LNP-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Although the exact cause of vaccine-associated anaphylaxis with the LNP-mRNA vaccines is still unknown, a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated lipid derivative in the LNPs is suspected to be the causative agent [6]. The PEG-conjugated lipids are common in two LNP-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: ALC-0159 in the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and PEG2000-DMG in the Moderna vaccine. These lipids are essential for the in vivo stability of mRNA-containing LNPs. PEGs are also common ingredients in pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic products; thus, certain populations may have already been exposed, sensitized, and developed pre-existing immunity against PEGs. Although PEG is generally considered a well-tolerated and non-antigenic ingredient, some people can be hypersensitive to PEG and experience acute allergic reactions upon exposure to the PEG-related products. PEG-associated anaphylaxis is considered to be a very rare event. The underlying mechanism of PEG-associated anaphylaxis is largely unknown, although IgE-dependent and IgE-independent mechanisms have been proposed [7]. One possible explanation for the sex imbalance is that sensitization to PEG is more common in women due to the relatively frequent exposure to PEG-containing products, such as cutaneous exposure to cosmetics or the use of medications such as contraceptive injections. Pre-existing anti-PEG antibodies have been reported to be associated with severe allergic reactions upon administration of a PEGylated drug [8], suggesting that prior exposure to the PEG-containing products may sensitize individuals and establish anti-PEG hypersensitivity. The female-biased severe allergic reaction against LNP-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is partly supported by the higher prevalence of anti-PEG antibodies in women than in men [9]. Another possible explanation includes hormonal differences such as the role of estrogen which may be an important factor in allergic immunological responses. Experimental data in rodents showed that estradiol enhances mast cell activation and allergic sensitization while progesterone suppresses histamine release but potentiates IgE formation [10]. Although some countries report the number of anaphylaxis cases associated with COVID-19 vaccines, the proportion of cases based on sex is not always reported. Special attention should be given to the female predominance associated with LNP-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccination plays a crucial role in a global pandemic situation; therefore, it is important to understand the pathophysiology of the severe allergic reactions against the LNP-mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and the reason for their female predominance. It seems worthwhile to investigate whether the individuals who experienced an anaphylactic reaction against the LNP-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine had a pre-existing immunity against PEG, by performing the skin prick test or measuring anti-PEG antibodies, especially anti-PEG IgE. It is also presumed that vaccination with PEG-containing LNP-mRNA vaccines may elicit an anti-PEG immunity in naive individuals and hamper the future use of PEG-containing products. Therefore, if we are able to identify individuals with a predisposition to anaphylaxis, precautionary measures may be taken such as additional monitoring, and the use of other types of COVID-19 vaccines can be considered for those individuals.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Roadmap for Sex-Responsive Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccine Research in Older Adults.

Authors:  Janna R Shapiro; Rosemary Morgan; Sean X Leng; Sabra L Klein
Journal:  Front Aging       Date:  2022-02-11

2.  Surveillance for Adverse Events After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination.

Authors:  Nicola P Klein; Ned Lewis; Kristin Goddard; Bruce Fireman; Ousseny Zerbo; Kayla E Hanson; James G Donahue; Elyse O Kharbanda; Allison Naleway; Jennifer Clark Nelson; Stan Xu; W Katherine Yih; Jason M Glanz; Joshua T B Williams; Simon J Hambidge; Bruno J Lewin; Tom T Shimabukuro; Frank DeStefano; Eric S Weintraub
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The Safety of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2 and JNJ-78436735 COVID-19 Vaccines: Safety Monitoring for Adverse Events Using Real-World Data.

Authors:  Soonok Sa; Chae Won Lee; Sung Ryul Shim; Hyounggyoon Yoo; Jinwha Choi; Ju Hee Kim; Kiwon Lee; Myunghee Hong; Hyun Wook Han
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 4.  A Systematic Review of the Sex and Gender Reporting in COVID-19 Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Shirin Heidari; Alice Palmer-Ross; Tracey Goodman
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-15

5.  Oral Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination: Analysis of VAERS Reports.

Authors:  Abanoub Riad; Ave Põld; Elham Kateeb; Sameh Attia
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-11

6.  Psychological and Psychiatric Events Following Immunization with Five Different Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Mario García-Alanis; Marisa Morales-Cárdenas; Liz Nicole Toapanta-Yanchapaxi; Erwin Chiquete; Isaac Núñez; Santa Elizabeth Ceballos-Liceaga; Guillermo Carbajal-Sandoval; Carla Toledo-Salinas; David Alejandro Mendoza-Hernández; Selma Cecilia Scheffler-Mendoza; José Antonio Ortega-Martell; Daniel Armando Carrillo-García; Noé Hernández-Valdivia; Alonso Gutiérrez-Romero; Javier Andrés Galnares-Olalde; Fernando Daniel Flores-Silva; José Luis Díaz-Ortega; Gustavo Reyes-Terán; Hugo López-Gatell; Ricardo Cortes-Alcalá; José Rogelio Pérez-Padilla; Antonio Arauz; Miguel García-Grimshaw; Sergio Iván Valdés-Ferrer
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11

Review 7.  Rare Heterogeneous Adverse Events Associated with mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rana I Oueijan; Olivia R Hill; Peter D Ahiawodzi; Pius S Fasinu; Dorothea K Thompson
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-11

8.  PEG-Free Polyion Complex Nanocarriers for Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor.

Authors:  James M Fay; Chaemin Lim; Anna Finkelstein; Elena V Batrakova; Alexander V Kabanov
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.525

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.