| Literature DB >> 34020629 |
Jeong-Ah Ahn1, Eun Ha Roh1, Tiffany Kim2, Jin Hyang Lee1, Ju-Eun Song3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The fertility rate in South Korea has been decreasing dramatically, as working women postpone or avoid childbirth due to the challenges of maintaining a career while raising a family. Working mothers with infants or toddlers have unique maternal adaptation needs, which must be understood in order to support their needs during childbearing years. Supporting successful maternal adaptation of working mothers is not only essential for each individual new working mother, but also benefits her family, her workplace, and the country. <br> METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to describe the current state of the science on maternal adaptation of working mothers with infants or toddlers in South Korea. Eligible studies, published between 2009 and 2018, were identified by searching electronic databases. Quantitative studies related to the maternal adaptation of Korean working mothers who had a child younger than age 3 years were included. 37 articles met the inclusion criteria for narrative analysis and synthesis. <br> RESULTS: Studies were classified into 4 major groups by maternal adaptation categories as psychological, behavioral, relational, and cognitive adaptation. The majority of studies were focused on working mothers' psychological adaptation (n = 36, 97.3%), followed by behavioral (n = 10, 27.0%), relational (n = 9, 24.3%), and cognitive (n = 3, 8.1%) adaptation. We found that maternal adaptation of working mothers was ultimately influenced by diverse variables within their communities, spousal and familial support, personal attributes, and job-related characteristics. <br> CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the importance of understanding variable aspects of maternal adaptation of working mothers with infants or toddlers. The complexity of working mothers' needs at the individual, family, and community levels must be considered in order to develop effective intervention programs and public policy for supporting maternal adaptation in Korea.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptation; Korea; Mothers; Systematic review; Working women
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34020629 PMCID: PMC8138505 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01357-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Quality assessment of selected studies (N = 37)
| Authors [Study ID#] | Item number of critical appraisal | Total score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| Kim [A1] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Park et al. [A2] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Lim [A3] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kim [A4] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Yang and Moon [A5] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kim [A6] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kim [A7] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Yang and Choi [A8] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Sung and Park [A9] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kim and Han [A10] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Park and Moon [A11] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Son [A12] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Lim et al. [A13] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Lee [A14] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Cho and Park [A15] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Joo [A16] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Heo and Kim [A17] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kim [A18] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Lee and Chin [A19] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Keum and Kim [A20] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kim and Kwon [A21] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kim [A22] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Park [A23] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Song et al. [A24] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Lee [A25] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Lee [A26] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Lee [A27] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Choi [A28] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Jeong and Jeon [A29] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Ko [A30] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kim and Kim [A31] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kim and Lee [A32] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Yoon and Shin [A33] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Choi [A34] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kim [A35] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Choi and Jahng [A36] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kim and Cho [A37] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Fig. 1Conceptual model
Fig. 2Flow chart
General characteristics of selected studies (N = 37)
| Variables | Category | n (%) | Study ID# |
|---|---|---|---|
| Publication year | 2009–2013 | 19 (51.4) | |
| 2014–2018 | 18 (48.6) | ||
| Research design | Observational study | 37 (100.0) | |
| Theoretical framework use | No | 37 (100.0) | |
| Setting of data collection | Child-care center | 22 (59.5) | |
| Panel study on Korean children | 6 (16.2) | ||
| Others | 9 (24.3) | ||
| Maternal adaptation | |||
| Psychological domain (n = 36, 97.3%) | Parenting stress | 27 (73.0) | 1–3, 4–6, 11–15, 19–26, 30–37 |
| Parenting guilt | 6 (16.2) | 9–11, 16, 18, 29 | |
| Parenting competency | 5 (13.5) | 7–9, 17, 26 | |
| Psychological distress | 3 (8.1) | 8, 23, 25 | |
| Depression | 3 (8.1) | 27, 28, 30 | |
| Maternal anxiety | 2 (5.4) | 5, 10 | |
| Behavioral domain (n = 10, 27.0%) | Parenting style | 5 (13.5) | 9, 12, 13, 16, 25 |
| Parenting behavior | 4 (10.8) | 10, 11, 18, 27 | |
| Parenting attitude | 3 (8.1) | 12, 13, 28 | |
| Relational domain (n = 9, 24.3%) | Marital satisfaction | 6 (16.2) | 12, 15, 20, 23, 31, 32 |
| Parental satisfaction | 4 (10.8) | 7, 9, 32, 35 | |
| Cognitive domain (n = 3, 8.1%) | Intention for subsequent childbirths | 3 (8.1) | 6, 34, 36 |
| Intrapersonal factors | |||
| Mother-related factors | General self-efficacy | 2 (5.4) | 12,15 |
| Psychological | Life satisfaction | 1 (2.7) | 7 |
| Physical | Sleeping problem | 1 (2.7) | 23 |
| Job-related factors | Work-family conflict | 4 (10.8) | 4, 21, 35, 28 |
| Job satisfaction | 3 (8.1) | 20, 34, 36 | |
| Attitude of occupation | 1 (2.7) | 5 | |
| Family-related factors | |||
| Child-related factors | Child temperament | 3 (8.1) | 12, 14, 26 |
| Spouse-related factors | Spousal support | 9 (24.3) | 4, 6, 12, 14, 15, 18, 20, 22, 31 |
| Community related factors | |||
| Social support | Social support | 11 (29.7) | 6, 9, 12, 14, 15, 19, 22, 26, 30, 33, 35 |
| Work-related environment | Employment status | 7 (18.9) | 9, 10, 22, 23, 27, 32, 33 |
| Job characteristics | 1 (2.7) | 23 | |
| Work-family culture | 1 (2.7) | 29 | |
| Work environment | 1 (2.7) | 4 | |
Fig. 3Path diagram. *Kim [A6]. †Sung and Park [A9], Park and Moon [A11], Choi [A28]. ‡Cho and Park [A15]. $Cho and Park [A15], Lee and Chin [A19], Kim [A22], Lee [A26], Ko [A30]. **Kim and Kim [A31]. ††Kim [A7]. ‡‡Kim [A4], Yang and Moon [A5], Kim and Han [A10], Joo [A16], Park [A23], Lee [A27], Choi [A28], Jeong and Jeon [A29]. $$Lim [A3], Son [A12], Lee [A26], Ko [A30]. ***Kim [A4], Cho and Park [A15], Keum and Kim [A20], Kim [A22]. †††Keum and Kim [A20]. ‡‡‡Kim [A7]. $$$Park and Moon [A11], Choi [A28]. ****Park [A23]. ††††Son [A12], Lee [A14], Park [A23], Song et al. [A24]. ‡‡‡‡Kim [A6], Choi [A34], Choi and Jahng [A36]. $$$$Kim and Kwon [A21], Kim [A35]. *****Kim [A4], Yang and Moon [A5], Kim and Kwon [A21]. †††††Choi [A34], Choi and Jahng [A36]. ‡‡‡‡‡Lee [A14], Kim and Kwon [A21]. $$$$$Keum and Kim [A20], Kim and Kim [A31], Kim and Lee [A32], Kim [A35]. ******Yang and Moon [A5], Son [A12]. ††††††Sung and Park [A9], Lim et al. [A13], Lee [A27]. ‡‡‡‡‡‡Kim [A6], Choi [A34], Choi and Jahng [A36]