Xia Liu1,2, Peng Zhang1, Meng Xue Liu2, Jun Li Ma2, Xin Chuan Wei1, Dan Fan3. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, No. 32 West Second Section, First Ring Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. 2. North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, No. 32 West Second Section, First Ring Road, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. fandan6688@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of a combination of a goal-directed fluid protocol and preoperative carbohydrate loading on postoperative complications in elderly patients still remains unknown. Therefore, we designed this trial to evaluate the relative impact of preoperative carbohydrate loading and intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy versus conventional fluid therapy (CFT) on clinical outcomes in elderly patients following gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial with 120 patients over 65 years undergoing gastrointestinal surgery were randomized into a CFT group (n = 60) with traditional methods of fasting and water-deprivation, and a GDFT group (n = 60) with carbohydrate (200 ml) loading 2 h before surgery. The CFT group underwent routine monitoring during surgery, however, the GDFT group was conducted by a Vigileo/FloTrac monitor with cardiac index (CI), stroke volume variation (SVV), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). For all patients, demographic data, intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Patients in the GDFT group received significantly less crystalloids fluid (1111 ± 442.9 ml vs 1411 ± 412.6 ml; p < 0.001) and produced significantly less urine output (200 ml [150-300] vs 400 ml [290-500]; p < 0.001) as compared to the CFT group. Moreover, GDFT was associated with a shorter average time to first flatus (56 ± 14.1 h vs 64 ± 22.3 h; p = 0.002) and oral intake (72 ± 16.9 h vs 85 ± 26.8 h; p = 0.011), as well as a reduction in the rate of postoperative complications (15 (25.0%) vs 29 (48.3%) patients; p = 0.013). However, postoperative hospitalization or hospitalization expenses were similar between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Focused on elderly patients undergoing open gastrointestinal surgery, we found perioperative fluid optimisation may be associated with improvement of bowel function and a lower incidence of postoperative complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR, ChiCTR1800018227 . Registered 6 September 2018 - Retrospectively registered.
BACKGROUND: The effect of a combination of a goal-directed fluid protocol and preoperative carbohydrate loading on postoperative complications in elderly patients still remains unknown. Therefore, we designed this trial to evaluate the relative impact of preoperative carbohydrate loading and intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy versus conventional fluid therapy (CFT) on clinical outcomes in elderly patients following gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial with 120 patients over 65 years undergoing gastrointestinal surgery were randomized into a CFT group (n = 60) with traditional methods of fasting and water-deprivation, and a GDFT group (n = 60) with carbohydrate (200 ml) loading 2 h before surgery. The CFT group underwent routine monitoring during surgery, however, the GDFT group was conducted by a Vigileo/FloTrac monitor with cardiac index (CI), stroke volume variation (SVV), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). For all patients, demographic data, intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Patients in the GDFT group received significantly less crystalloids fluid (1111 ± 442.9 ml vs 1411 ± 412.6 ml; p < 0.001) and produced significantly less urine output (200 ml [150-300] vs 400 ml [290-500]; p < 0.001) as compared to the CFT group. Moreover, GDFT was associated with a shorter average time to first flatus (56 ± 14.1 h vs 64 ± 22.3 h; p = 0.002) and oral intake (72 ± 16.9 h vs 85 ± 26.8 h; p = 0.011), as well as a reduction in the rate of postoperative complications (15 (25.0%) vs 29 (48.3%) patients; p = 0.013). However, postoperative hospitalization or hospitalization expenses were similar between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Focused on elderly patients undergoing open gastrointestinal surgery, we found perioperative fluid optimisation may be associated with improvement of bowel function and a lower incidence of postoperative complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR, ChiCTR1800018227 . Registered 6 September 2018 - Retrospectively registered.
Authors: H G Wakeling; M R McFall; C S Jenkins; W G A Woods; W F A Miles; G R Barclay; S C Fleming Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2005-09-09 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: B Lansdorp; J Lemson; M J A M van Putten; A de Keijzer; J G van der Hoeven; P Pickkers Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Christina H Shin; Dustin R Long; Duncan McLean; Stephanie D Grabitz; Karim Ladha; Fanny P Timm; Tharusan Thevathasan; Alberto Pieretti; Cristina Ferrone; Andreas Hoeft; Thomas W L Scheeren; Boyd Taylor Thompson; Tobias Kurth; Matthias Eikermann Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jan Benes; Ivan Chytra; Pavel Altmann; Marek Hluchy; Eduard Kasal; Roman Svitak; Richard Pradl; Martin Stepan Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-06-16 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper; Michael J Englesbe; Michael O'Reilly; Amy M Shanks; Douglas M Fetterman; Andrew L Rosenberg; Richard D Swartz Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Rupert M Pearse; David A Harrison; Neil MacDonald; Michael A Gillies; Mark Blunt; Gareth Ackland; Michael P W Grocott; Aoife Ahern; Kathryn Griggs; Rachael Scott; Charles Hinds; Kathryn Rowan Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 56.272