Literature DB >> 3402045

Efficacy of trimethylselenonium versus selenite in cancer chemoprevention and its modulation by arsenite.

C Ip1, H Ganther.   

Abstract

Selenite, which has been demonstrated to be an effective prophylactic agent in experimental carcinogenesis, is metabolized to trimethylselenonium as an excretory product. Previous reports in the literature have shown that arsenite decreases the toxicity of selenite but increases that of trimethylselenonium. The present study was designed to compare the anti-carcinogenic efficacy of selenite and trimethylselenonium and their interactions with arsenite in chemoprevention, using the dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary tumor model in rats. The results of this experiment indicated that supplementation of selenite (3 p.p.m. Se) alone produced approximately 50% reduction in tumor yield, and arsenite (5 p.p.m. As) reduced the response to selenite. In contrast, arsenite greatly enhanced the protective effect of trimethylselenonium (40 p.p.m. Se); this combination was nearly as effective as selenite, although either trimethylselenonium or arsenite alone was inactive. Thus, arsenite has the capacity to influence the anti-carcinogenic action of selenium, and can either potentiate or attenuate the protective effect depending on the methylation state of the selenium compound. The metabolism of selenium and its perturbation by arsenite are discussed in relation to the above findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3402045     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/9.8.1481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  9 in total

1.  Temporal changes in tissue glutathione in response to chemical form, dose, and duration of selenium treatment. Relevance to cancer chemoprevention by selenium.

Authors:  H J Thompson; I P Clement
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 2.  Methylselenocysteine: a promising antiangiogenic agent for overcoming drug delivery barriers in solid malignancies for therapeutic synergy with anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Arup Bhattacharya
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 6.648

3.  Dietary selenium fails to influence cigarette smoke-induced lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice.

Authors:  Howard P Glauert; Joshua B Martin; Jun Li; Job C Tharappel; Sung Gu Han; Harold D Gillespie; Austin H Cantor; Eun Y Lee; C Gary Gairola
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 4.  Selenium. Mechanistic aspects of anticarcinogenic action.

Authors:  G N Schrauzer
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1992 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Inhibition of DNA alkylation damage with inorganic salts.

Authors:  Elizabeth E Hamilton; Jonathan J Wilker
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 3.358

6.  Study of distribution and interaction of arsenic and selenium in rat thyroid.

Authors:  E Glattre; A Mravcova; J Lener; M Vobecky; E Egertova; M Mysliveckova
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1995 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Synergistic toxicity between arsenic and methylated selenium compounds.

Authors:  R J Kraus; H E Ganther
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1989 Apr-May       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  Selenium in bone health: roles in antioxidant protection and cell proliferation.

Authors:  Huawei Zeng; Jay J Cao; Gerald F Combs
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 9.  Selenium as an essential micronutrient: roles in cell cycle and apoptosis.

Authors:  Huawei Zeng
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.