Literature DB >> 34020048

Effects of prior osteoporosis treatment on 12-month treatment response of romosozumab in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Kosuke Ebina1, Hideki Tsuboi2, Yoshio Nagayama3, Masafumi Kashii4, Shoichi Kaneshiro5, Akira Miyama6, Hiroyuki Nakaya7, Yasuo Kunugiza8, Makoto Hirao6, Gensuke Okamura2, Yuki Etani6, Kenji Takami6, Atsushi Goshima6, Taihei Miura6, Ken Nakata9, Seiji Okada6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of prior treatment and determine the predictors of a 12-month treatment response of romosozumab (ROMO) in 148 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.
METHODS: In this prospective, observational, and multicenter study, treatment naïve patients (Naïve; n=50) or patients previously treated with bisphosphonates (BP; n=37) or denosumab (DMAb; n=45) or teriparatide (TPTD; n=16) (mean age, 75.0 years; T-scores of the lumbar spine [LS] -3.2 and total hip [TH] -2.6) were switched to ROMO due to insufficient effects of prior treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD) and serum bone turnover markers were evaluated for 12 months.
RESULTS: At 12 months, changes in LS BMD were Naïve (18.2%), BP (10.2%), DMAb (6.4%), and TPTD (11.2%) (P<0.001 between groups) and changes in TH BMD were Naïve (5.6%), BP (3.3%), DMAb (0.6%), and TPTD (4.4%) (P<0.01 between groups), respectively. In all groups, the LS BMD significantly increased from baseline at 6 and 12 months, although only the DMAb group failed to obtain a significant increase in TH BMD during 12-month treatment. Mean values of N-terminal type I procollagen propeptide (PINP; μg/L) from baseline → 1 month → 12 months were Naïve (67.9 → 134.1 → 51.0), BP (32. 2 → 81.7 → 40.9), DMAb (30.4 → 56.2 → 75.3), and TPTD (97.4 → 105.1 → 37.1), and those of isoform 5b of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP-5b; mU/dL) were Naïve (500.4 → 283.8 → 267.1), BP (273.4 → 203.1 → 242.0), DMAb (220.3 → 246.1 → 304.8), and TPTD (446.6 → 305.1 → 235.7), respectively. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the significant predictors of BMD change at 12 months were difference of prior treatment (r=-2.8, P<0.001) and value of PINP at 1 month (r=0.04, P<0.01) for LS, and difference of prior treatment (r=-1.3, P<0.05) and percentage change of TRACP-5b at 1 month (r=-0.06, P<0.05) for TH.
CONCLUSIONS: The early effects of ROMO on LS and TH BMD increase at 12 months were significantly affected by the difference of prior treatment and are predicted by the early change in bone turnover markers.
Copyright © 2021 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone turnover marker; Postmenopausal osteoporosis; Predictor; Prior treatment; Romosozumab

Year:  2021        PMID: 34020048     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  2 in total

1.  The Real-World Effect of 12 Months of Romosozumab Treatment on Patients With Osteoporosis With a High Risk of Fracture and Factors Predicting the Rate of Bone Mass Increase: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Inose; Akane Ariga; Takayuki Motoyoshi; Kazuyuki Fukushima; Shoji Tomizawa; Tsuyoshi Kato; Kunihiko Takahashi; Toshitaka Yoshii; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-06-05

2.  Romosozumab and antiresorptive treatment: the importance of treatment sequence.

Authors:  Felicia Cosman; David L Kendler; Bente L Langdahl; Benjamin Z Leder; E Michael Lewiecki; Akimitsu Miyauchi; Maria Rojeski; Michele McDermott; Mary K Oates; Cassandra E Milmont; Cesar Libanati; Serge Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.071

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.