Literature DB >> 34019830

Neonatal care practices need to be further explored - Authors' reply.

Emma Sacks1, Hedieh Mehrtash2, Mamadou Dioulde Balde3, Theresa Azonima Irinyenikan4, Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh5, Thae Maung Maung6, Özge Tunçalp2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34019830      PMCID: PMC8149298          DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00095-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Glob Health        ISSN: 2214-109X            Impact factor:   26.763


× No keyword cloud information.
The field of experience of care for (including mistreatment of) neonates is relatively new. Our Article exploring neonatal care practices in a multicountry observational study provides a preliminary examination of occurrences and sets the stage for additional research that is crucial to this agenda. We thank Harsha Kumar H N for his keen interest in this topic and for raising important questions, especially about the type of facilities providing immediate postnatal care to neonates globally. The facilities included in this study were public and provided care that was either free of charge or covered by national health insurance. Although the type of mistreatment can vary by type of facility, there is evidence that mistreatment can occur at both public and private facilities. Even in facilities that provide free health-care, families might be required to make informal payments. In some instances, families who demand accountability receive better care, but cases in which families are retaliated against or have feared retribution have also been documented. Therefore, it is important to apply standards for quality of care at every facility providing maternal and neonate care, and to have patients and providers work together to achieve this goal. Mistreatment is probably due to a multitude of drivers, including the conditions and constraints of health-care systems. Health-care systems should be accountable to patients and providers; they should provide enabling and empowering environments to support health-care workers, including proper equipment, training, supervision, and supportive policies. For example, to support breastfeeding, facility structures and policies should allow the participation of partners or of other family members, restrict the promotion of breast-milk substitutes, and encourage rooming-in of neonates with their families. Investing in the physical and human resources of health-care systems is essential for both public and private facilities, and across levels of care. Building on the WHO study on mistreatment of women, we were able to use the available multicountry data to explore factors associated with neonatal care practices with a robust modelling approach.9 Kumar highlights additional factors that will need to be explored in future studies, such as the influence of the cost of services, types of facilities, training of providers, women's employment status, counselling on breastfeeding, and other family health-care preferences. We are hopeful that our paper promotes future research on defining and measuring neonatal care practices and on identifying strategies and policies to improve care. We declare no competing interests.
  6 in total

1.  Do you need to pay for quality care? Associations between bribes and out-of-pocket expenditures on quality of care during childbirth in India.

Authors:  Amanda Landrian; Beth S Phillips; Shreya Singhal; Shambhavi Mishra; Fnu Kajal; May Sudhinaraset
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.344

2.  Beyond measurement: the drivers of disrespect and abuse in obstetric care.

Authors:  Gita Sen; Bhavya Reddy; Aditi Iyer
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2018-09-07

3.  "We are called the et cetera": experiences of the poor with health financing reforms that target them in Kenya.

Authors:  Evelyn Kabia; Rahab Mbau; Robinson Oyando; Clement Oduor; Godfrey Bigogo; Sammy Khagayi; Edwine Barasa
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-06-24

4.  An investigation into mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in maternity care facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Loveday Penn-Kekana; Kaveri Halder; Véronique Filippi
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: a cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys.

Authors:  Meghan A Bohren; Hedieh Mehrtash; Bukola Fawole; Thae Maung Maung; Mamadou Dioulde Balde; Ernest Maya; Soe Soe Thwin; Adeniyi K Aderoba; Joshua P Vogel; Theresa Azonima Irinyenikan; A Olusoji Adeyanju; Nwe Oo Mon; Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh; Sihem Landoulsi; Chris Guure; Richard Adanu; Boubacar Alpha Diallo; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Anne-Marie Soumah; Alpha Oumar Sall; Özge Tunçalp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  The first 2 h after birth: prevalence and factors associated with neonatal care practices from a multicountry, facility-based, observational study.

Authors:  Emma Sacks; Hedieh Mehrtash; Meghan Bohren; Mamadou Dioulde Balde; Joshua P Vogel; Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh; Anayda Portela; Adeniyi K Aderoba; Theresa Azonima Irinyenikan; Thae Maung Maung; Soe Soe Thwin; Nwe Oo Mon; Anne-Marie Soumah; Chris Guure; Boubacar Alpha Diallo; A Olusoji Adeyanju; Ernest Maya; Richard Adanu; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Özge Tunçalp
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 26.763

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.