Spinocerebellar ataxia clinical trials: opportunities and challenges.

The spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are a group of dominantly inherited diseases that share the defining feature of progressive cerebellar ataxia. The disease process, however, is not confined to the cerebellum; other areas of the brain, in particular, the brainstem, are also affected, resulting in a high burden of morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no disease-modifying treatments for the SCAs, but preclinical research has led to the development of therapeutic agents ripe for testing in patients. Unfortunately, due to the rarity of these diseases and their slow and variable progression, there are substantial hurdles to overcome in conducting clinical trials. While the epidemiological features of the SCAs are immutable, the feasibility of conducting clinical trials is being addressed through a combination of strategies. These include improvements in clinical outcome measures, the identification of imaging and fluid biomarkers, and innovations in clinical trial design. In this review, we highlight current challenges in initiating clinical trials for the SCAs and also discuss pathways for researchers and clinicians to mitigate these challenges and harness opportunities for clinical trial development.

Introduction

The spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) comprise a group of dominantly inherited cerebellar disorders that typically begin in mid‐life. The early ataxic symptoms of gait, speech, and eye movement incoordination are often followed by non‐ataxic symptoms, which include cognitive deficits, cranial nerve dysfunction, spasticity, rigidity, and dystonia. For many patients, neurodegeneration occurs in multiple brain regions including the brainstem, resulting in significantly reduced lifespan. , , Though relatively rare compared to other human neurodegenerative syndromes, the SCAs produce significant long‐term disability and therefore place a significant burden on not just patients, but also the overall health care infrastructure.

Forty‐eight SCAs have been identified to date. , , The SCAs are designated by the prefix SCA followed by a number, which reflects the order in which that genetic mutation was identified. The most common SCAs have all likely been identified. While the genetic underpinning of the SCAs are diverse, the most prevalent SCAs are caused by expansion of CAG trinucleotide repeats, which encode a polyglutamine tract in the protein product. These include SCAs 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 17, and a related ataxic syndrome, dentatorubral‐pallidoluyesian atrophy/DRPLA. The polyglutamine SCAs account for more than half of the known SCAs and are the best characterized.

Six other ataxias—SCA8, 10, 12, 31, 36, and 37—are also caused by nucleotide repeats, but in these diseases, the repeats do not occur in the coding region of the gene. , , Pathology here is thought to result from toxic RNA species or a peptide product that results from a non‐canonical form of translation, termed repeat‐associated non‐ATG initiated translation (RAN translation). , These pathogenic mechanisms could also contribute to the pathogenesis of the polyglutamine ataxias which is an active area of study. The remaining SCAs are caused by conventional mutations. These include point mutations or deletions in the coding regions of the genes, resulting in abnormal protein products.

As one moves toward finding therapies, advances in our understanding of these diseases at a mechanistic level are proving to be crucial. For the polyglutamine repeat SCAs in particular, research has benefited from knowledge gained from other polyglutamine repeat disorders, most notably Huntington’s disease (HD), another autosomal dominant disease caused by polyglutamine repeat expansion. There appear to be clear commonalities among the polyglutamine repeat disorders in pathogenic pathways at a subcellular level. Polyglutamine expansion causes the protein to misfold and accumulate in cells due to impaired clearance by quality control mechanisms in the cell, including proteasomal and autophagic clearance. The accumulated polyglutamine protein is thought to exert its pathogenic effect mainly through a toxic gain of function mechanism. A greater number of CAG repeats is associated with earlier age of onset, faster progression, and a broader spectrum of clinical symptoms. , The number of CAG repeats can increase over subsequent generations due to meiotic instability, which influences the disease severity in different family members. More recently, it has been found that the CAG repeat length can vary in different cells from somatic instability and this could also modify the disease process. ,

There are currently no disease‐modifying treatments for any of the SCAs and there are many challenges to be overcome in clinical trial development (Fig. 1). Research suggests that a promising strategy for at least the polyglutamine SCAs lies in reducing the level of the toxic mutant protein itself. This strategy is appealing since it does not require a complete understanding of downstream pathogenic pathways. , , Several high‐throughput small‐molecule screens have revealed promising candidates that may lower levels of the mutant protein. , , But perhaps more exciting are recently developed approaches based on newer RNA depleting or DNA editing tools. These include small‐interfering RNA (siRNA), micro‐RNA (miRNA), or antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)‐based approaches to target RNA species, as well as CRISPR‐based approaches to target RNA or DNA. , , Many of these strategies have been validated in animal models of SCAs. , , Similar approaches are further along in Huntington disease (HD), a more common polyglutamine disease, where ASOs targeting the mutated huntingtin protein are already being tested in clinical trials. , The hope is that the results of the HD trials will inform work in the SCAs.

FIGURE 1

Schematic summary of challenges facing clinical research in the spinocerebellar ataxias and proposed elements that are critical to support clinical trial readiness.

In addition to targeting the mutant protein itself, other strategies are aimed at addressing down‐stream targets that contribute to disease pathogenesis. Pharmacologically addressable deficits include repleting neurotrophic factors such as brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), ameliorating ion channel dysfunction, or addressing consequences of mitochondrial damage including the generation of reactive oxygen species. , , , , , Lastly, a less targeted approach to therapeutic development is to repurpose or modify drugs used for other neurodegenerative disorders. For instance, an ongoing trial is testing whether an analogue of riluzole provides symptomatic benefit for patients with polyglutamine SCAs. , Drugs used to treat non‐neurologic diseases can be repurposed as well. For example, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor nilotinib, which is used to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia, is under active clinical investigation for the SCAs. , ,

Many of the potential treatment strategies outlined above could potentially be neuroprotective, meaning that these strategies could halt or slow disease progression. This also raises the exciting possibility that new treatments could be tested in pre‐manifest individuals to potentially prevent development of manifest disease. Given the autosomal dominant inheritance pattern of the SCAs, the children of affected individuals carry a 50% risk of inheriting an SCA mutation. It is important to recruit these at‐risk individuals to identify the earliest and most sensitive clinical signs of disease. For example, mutation carriers have been shown to have mild coordination deficits and brain abnormalities that gradually increase before the onset of clinically evident ataxia. Furthermore, with recent advancements in imaging techniques like MRS and diffusion MRI, it is feasible to detect brain abnormalities in the pre‐symptomatic period. ,

Despite the lack of currently available treatments for the SCAs, promising treatment agents are entering the pipeline (Fig. 2). This review will provide an overview of the current challenges facing clinical trial development in the SCAs and the approaches being taken to overcome these challenges.

FIGURE 2

Schematic summary of major therapeutic agents being tested for the SCAs. Major agents that have been successful in preclinical disease models are summarized, including gene silencing strategies, neurotrophic agents, and ion channel modifiers. Current agents being tested in active clinical trials in the United States were identified from clinicaltrials.gov.

Challenges To Clinical Trials

Low disease prevalence and phenotypic variability

The first challenge to clinical trials for the SCAs is the rarity of these disorders. The global prevalence of the known SCAs is estimated to be between 1 and 6 per 100,000. , , The low prevalence of the SCAs makes it difficult to recruit sufficient patients for any given trial. ,

Another constraint to clinical trial development is the significant clinical heterogeneity of the SCAs. Because of the genetic heterogeneity of this group of disorders, patient recruitment must take into account the specific SCA subtype. Even for the polyglutamine SCAs, which share a common mutational mechanism, clinical features differ. This clinical heterogeneity is true not just for disease severity but also for the range of symptoms and the rate of disease progression. SCA6, for instance, tends to have a relatively pure cerebellar syndrome, is milder in severity, and more protracted in course, while SCAs 1, 2, 3, and 7 are associated with brainstem dysfunction with variable involvement of the basal ganglia, cortex, and spinal cord. , , There are other peculiarities of the SCAs: SCAs 1, 2, and 3 are often accompanied by peripheral neuropathy, while SCA7 is more prone to result in retinal degeneration and blindness. , , ,

Even more problematic is the variability within a particular SCA subtype. There is substantial individual variability in terms of disease penetrance, age at presentation, and rate of symptom progression, which complicates attempts to monitor disease progression and response to potential therapies. For example, the age of onset of the SCAs is highly variable, with one study reporting the onset of symptoms in SCA1, SCA2, and SCA3 ranging from the first to the seventh decade of life in all three disorders. A major source of the variability in the polyglutamine SCAs arises from the length of the CAG expansion—the longer the repeat, the earlier the symptom onset and the worse the severity. , , Longer expansions are also accompanied by more extracerebellar involvement. , Therefore, at least for the polyglutamine SCAs, CAG repeat length is one method by which patients can be stratified in terms of suspected disease severity.

Additional causes of variability likely arise from genetic and environmental variables. There are hints that the size of repeats in other genes could contribute to disease, while other studies suggest that ethnicity might play a role. , , , It is also likely that genes that play a role in DNA repair also modulate disease phenotype through effects on somatic instability, as has been described for HD. From a clinical trial standpoint, all these factors influencing the disease phenotype require a sufficient number of patients of each SCA subtype to be recruited to prevent confounding variables that might interfere with the interpretation of interventional studies.

Efforts Toward Clinical Trial Readiness

Pre‐clinical data have identified several exciting potential treatments for the SCAs. This includes both symptomatic agents as well as neuroprotective treatment strategies. Several strategies are being pursued to translate the information learned from pre‐clinical models into fruitful and productive clinical trials. These include: (1) improvements in clinical rating scales to provide robust and precise outcome measures with less variability; (2) development of biomarkers to provide additional objective measures to monitor neurodegeneration; and (3) clinical trial design and statistical innovations to allow for optimization of the small number of patients recruited for these trials.

Improvements in clinical measures: rating scales

Ataxia, like most movement disorders, is difficult to characterize in an objective and accurate manner. For this reason, several rating scales have been developed to serve as instruments to capture ataxia severity.

The most widely used ataxia rating scales are the International Cooperative Rating Scale (ICARS) and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) scale. The ICARS, the first of the two to be developed, has 19 items with four subdomains assessing posture and gait, kinetic function, speech, and oculomotor function. The SARA scale is shorter, with only 8 items, and includes common clinical exam maneuvers that are frequently performed as part of routine assessments for evidence of cerebellar impairment. It is similar to the ICARS, with several items removed in order to reduce redundancy. It also differs from the ICARS in that it does not test for eye movement abnormalities. Other scales include the Modified ICARS (MICARS), the Brief Ataxia Rating Scale (BARS), and the Neurological Examination Score for Spinocerebellar Ataxia (NESSCA). None of these scales are meant to address non‐ataxic symptoms, for which additional scales have been developed. These additional scales include the Inventory of Non‐Ataxia Signs, which rates several neurological signs including spasticity, tremor, and dystonia, and the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale (CCAS), which is a dedicated cognitive scale to identify cognitive deficits in the context of cerebellar decline.

The ataxic rating scales are being combined with other quantifiable performance tests. These include the SCA Functional Index, which combines measures on an 8‐Minute Walk Test, a Nine‐Hole Peg Test, and a measure of the number of syllables that a patient can repeat in 10 sec; and the Composite Cerebellar Functional Severity Score (CCFS), which combines a click test of alternate tapping on two keys at a fixed distance with the Nine‐Hole Peg Test. ,

Some of these rating scales and performance measure are already being used in natural history studies. The rating scales are relatively reliable in their ability to detect disease, and can detect conversion from pre‐manifest to manifest disease over a period of 4–8 years. , , They do, however, have their limitations. They are non‐linear scales, with different weights given to different ataxic symptoms. They have floor and ceiling effects, making them not very effective when the symptoms are either very mild or very severe. Furthermore, there is still some unavoidable subjectivity in scoring. And finally, patient performance may fluctuate for a variety of reasons, including energy levels and the time of the day when patients are evaluated.

In a clinical trial, disease progression will likely be influenced by age of onset, repeat length, and age at trial inclusion. , For the most rapidly progressive polyglutamine SCA, namely SCA1, estimates suggest that approximately 142 patients would need to be recruited to power two arms of a clinical study to detect a 50% reduction in progression of the SARA score in a 1‐year trial. The necessary recruitment numbers for other SCA subtypes for which there is natural history data are 172 patient for SCA2, 202 for SCA3, and 602 for SCA6. Clearly, such long duration studies with large cohorts are difficult to conduct because of limitations in patient recruitment, patient attrition, comorbid conditions, and expense. Efforts are, therefore, ongoing to use new technological innovations to capture objective longitudinal data on patient symptoms in order to remove any bias from a human rater, and to provide additional objective data points assessing patients’ symptoms over time. These include the use of wearable sensors or smartphones to capture movements, allowing for remote long‐term tracking of patients’ movements so as to more accurately capture the full range and variability of symptoms on a day‐to‐day basis. Given that ataxia symptoms are known to fluctuate based on a variety of environmental factors, longitudinal wearable sensors may provide a more accurate representation of symptom burden, as opposed to intermittent clinical assessments. Similar technologies are being studied for other neurological diseases such as PD. , It is likely that advances in this arena will provide more precise and accurate rating scales for the SCAs that will improve statistical power in clinical trials. Potential downsides to wearable sensor technologies include patient inconvenience or discomfort as well as technical difficulties with device use or with data storage and interpretation.

While clinical rating scales and wearable devices allow us to assess ataxia and other neurologic symptoms, it is also important to keep in mind that the clinical changes measured must be clinically relevant. Therefore, from both a regulatory standpoint as well as from a patient advocacy standpoint, it will be important to incorporate quality of life metrics as well as other patient‐reported outcome (PRO) measures as a critical outcome in clinical trial design. This will ensure that any potential treatment interventions produce clinically relevant improvements for patients.

Identification of imaging and fluid biomarkers

Biomarkers are defined as “objectively‐measured characteristics that serve as indicators of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes or pharmacologic responses to therapeutic interventions.” Strictly speaking, the motor performance measures described above could also be considered biomarkers. However, for the purposes of this review article, we focus our discussion of biomarkers on neuroimaging findings associated with disease state (Table 1) and biochemical markers obtained from body fluids (Table 2). The expectation is that, when validated, biomarkers for the SCAs could be used singly or in combination to provide effective ways to monitor disease onset, progression, or response to treatment, with less variability and more objectivity than clinical rating scales.

Table 1

Current state of imaging biomarkers in the SCAs.

Brain imaging
MRI: brain volume changes
↓Cerebellum and brainstem volume in SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, and SCA17 66 , 67 , 68
↓White matter and gray matter volume in cerebellum and brain stem in SCA1, SCA2, and SCA3 69 , 70 , 71 , 72
↓Spinal cord, basal ganglia, and cerebellar vermis size in SCA3 and SCA6 69 , 73
↓ Caudate size in SCA6 and SCA17 69 , 74
MRS: chemical changes
↓[Glu], [NAA], [NAAG], [tNAA], [Cho/Cr] ratio, and [Glu/Gln] ratio in SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, and SCA6 75 , 76 , 77 , 78
↑ [Glc], [Gln], [mI], [Tau], [tCr], and [Glc+Tau] in SCA1, SCA2, and SCA3 75 , 76 , 77 , 78
↓[GABA] in SCA6 41
↓ [NAA/Cho], [NAA/Cr] in SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, and SCA17 75 , 76 , 77 , 78
PET: metabolic changes
[18F]FDG, [11C]dMP, and [11C]MP4P: ↓metabolism in different brain regions in SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, and SCA17 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86
SPECT: functional and metabolic changes
SCA2
[99mTc]TRODAT‐1 SPECT:↓striatal DAT binding 87
[123I]β‐CIT SPECT:↓striato‐cerebellar ratio 88
[123I]IBZM SPECT:↓striato‐frontal IBZM binding ratio 88
[123I]FP‐CIT SPECT:↓uptake in caudate and putamen 89
SCA3
[99mTc]TRODAT‐1 SPECT:↓nigrostriatal ratio 90
[99mTc]HMPAO SPECT:↓perfusion in cerebellar hemispheres, 91 inferior, 91 and superior 91 frontal lobe, 91 lateral temporal lobe, 91 parietal lobe, and vermis 91
[99mTc]ECD SPECT:↓perfusion in bilateral cerebellum 92 and vermis 92
[123I]iomazenil SPECT:↓binding in cerebellum, 93 cerebral cortex, 93 thalamus, 93 and striatum 93
SCA6
[99mTc]ECD SPECT:↓perfusion in cerebellar hemisphere 94 and cerebral vermis 94
SCA17
[99mTc]TRODAT‐1 SPECT:↓striatal DAT binding 87

Table is modified from Meng‐LingChen et al.

Table 2

Current state of fluid biomarkers in the SCAs.

Fluid biomarkers
Poly‐Q expanded ataxin‐3
↑ in plasma and CSF of SCA3 104 , 105
Oxidative stress markers
↑ in serum of SCA3 106
Carboxyl terminus of Hsp70‐interacting protein
↑ in serum and CSF of SCA3 107
Oxidation of 2′,7′‐dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH‐DA)
↑ in serum of SCA3 108
Glutathione peroxidase activity
↓ in serum of symptomatic SCA3 108
IGFBP‐1 and IGFBP‐3
↑ in serum of SCA3 109
Insulin
↓ in serum of SCA3 109
Neuron‐specific enolase
↑ in serum of SCA3 110 , 111
Neurofilament light chain
↑ in serum and CSF of SCA1 112 and SCA3 112 , 113 , 114
Phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain
↑ in serum of SCA3 112
miRNA
↑ miR‐34b, 114 miR‐7014 115 in serum, and CSF of SCA3
Differential expression of seventy one miRs in plasma of SCA7 12
↓miR‐25, 114 miR‐29a, 114 miR‐125b, 114 and miR‐7014 115 in serum/plasma of SCA3
Different expression of various exosomal miRs in plasma and CSF of SCA3 115
S100B
↑ in serum of SCA3 111
Tau
↑ in CSF of SCA2 117
Valine, leucine, and tyrosine
↓ in plasma of SCA7 118

Imaging biomarkers

Candidate imaging biomarkers have arisen from our understanding of findings garnered from neuroimaging performed on patients in the clinic (Table 1). , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Focal degeneration can be quantified structurally using region of interest (ROI)‐based analysis. Structural abnormalities are accompanied by disturbances in white matter tracts as demonstrated by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), with abnormalities discernible not just in the cerebellum and cerebellar peduncles but also in the brainstem and cerebral white matter. , , These imaging abnormalities align closely with clinical rating scales, and indeed can help identify pre‐manifest abnormalities and predict phenotypic conversion. , ,

Structural changes visible on MRI are accompanied by functional changes as well. While resting state functional MRI shows a few abnormalities, a more promising strategy is magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). In MRS‐specific neurochemical, abnormalities are identified by comparing spectroscopic peaks corresponding to different metabolites. Up to 15 metabolites are measured with current MRS technologies. The most useful so far are N‐acetylaspartate (NAA, a marker of neuronal density and function) and glutamate that are altered with neuronal degeneration. , , Furthermore, the glial marker myoinositol has been shown to increase with gliosis. Other metabolites that can be monitored include the metabolic marker creatine/phosphocreatine and the membrane marker choline. MRS abnormalities are influenced by the specific SCA subtype, and they are even more sensitive to progression and phenotypic conversion than structural MRI. , , ,

Other imaging modalities are also being tested. These include positron emission tomography (PET) and single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). In both modalities, tracers are used to interrogate specific circuit dysfunction, such as dopamine transmission. The current data on imaging biomarkers in the SCAs are summarized in Table 1. There are many pros and cons to the different modalities available including variable sensitivity and specificity, and the use of certain technologies may be challenging in resource‐limited settings. While these efforts are still in their infancy, the hope is that several imaging modalities used together could produce a multimodal imaging signature to track disease onset and progression.

Fluid biomarkers

Fluid biomarkers are biomolecules or metabolites in the blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that correlate with an underlying pathological process. For the SCAs, the purpose is not to identify a biomarker for diagnosis, since diagnosis is achievable by genetic testing alone. Rather, the goal is to identify markers that predict phenoconversion (from the asymptomatic to symptomatic condition), or provide objective evidence of disease progression.

While no fluid biomarkers have yet been validated for the SCAs, there are some promising candidates (Table 2). , , , , , , , , , , , , , , The first candidate is the mutant protein itself in the case of the polyglutamine SCAs. In all these ataxias, the protein tends to accumulate and aggregate. Following the levels of the mutant polyglutamine protein would be analogous to following the levels of other proteins in the more common neurodegenerative proteinopathies: Aβ 42 and tau (including phosphorylated tau) in AD, alpha synuclein in PD, and huntingtin protein in HD. , , ,

The comparison with HD is particularly apt since, as a polyglutamine disorder, it serves as an exemplar that can provide important insight into what we might observe in the polyglutamine SCAs. Levels of mutant huntingtin protein have been found to be elevated in the CSF of patients with HD, and importantly, the level correlates with diminished cognitive and motor function in HD patients. , Huntingtin levels are also being followed in clinical trials attempting huntingtin reduction by ASOs to show target engagement of the ASOs. Techniques to detect mutant huntingtin in the CSF have required technical advances in antibody‐mediated detection, and similar approaches are being developed for the polyglutamine SCAs. For instance, a recent strategy for monitoring ataxin‐3 levels in blood has been identified, although it is still unclear the extent to which blood levels of ataxin‐3 reflect the levels in the central nervous system.

In addition to biomarkers based on the biology of the specific disease, there are candidate fluid biomarkers that are more broadly applicable to diverse neurodegenerative disorders. The most promising of these are the neurofilament proteins, which are constituents of the neuronal cytoskeleton that leak out of damaged neurons. These proteins are showing considerable promise as a general marker of neuroaxonal damage in a wide range of neurological disorders, including HD, and can be detected not just in CSF but also in blood. , , Neurofilament light chain (NFL) and a phosphorylated form of neurofilament heavy chain (pNFH) have been the most thoroughly studied to date. In HD, for instance, the level of NFL in blood correlates with disease severity as assessed by standardized functional capacity scoring, brain atrophy on imaging, and CAG‐repeat length.

While not all SCAs have been evaluated for NFL levels, in SCA3, serum levels of NFL are significantly elevated in patients compared to controls. Importantly NFL levels correlate with disease severity as measured via clinical SARA scores. , , NFL is also elevated in genetic carriers who have not yet developed ataxia. Pilot studies suggest that NFL proteins are likely to be elevated in other SCA subtypes as well. ,

Biomarkers are also being identified by additional candidate‐based approaches focusing on neurotrophic factors, cytokines, or markers of oxidative stress that are known to be affected in preclinical models of the disease. , There is also the possibility of using unbiased biomarker discovery approaches such as mass‐spectroscopy techniques, which have the advantage of accelerating the identification of biomarkers since multiple potential candidates can be screened in parallel. These large‐scale screens need not be confined to proteins. For instance, metabolites could be identified using dedicated metabolomic or lipidomic approaches as is being done for other neurodegenerative diseases. , RNA molecules could be detected by RNA isolation from leukocytes or exosomes (including microRNA and mRNA). , Clearly, the identification and validation of a biomarker signature in the blood or CSF could be an invaluable tool in evaluating the response to any investigational drug, especially when used in conjunction with clinical rating scales and imaging biomarkers.

Innovations in clinical trial design

Unlike the more prevalent neurodegenerative disorders, clinical trial implementation for rare diseases such as the SCAs can pose unique challenges. However, in many respects, ataxia researchers are going over well‐ploughed terrain based on the lessons learned from other neurodegenerative diseases, most notably HD. In the HD field, there have been large‐scale biomarker studies such as TRACK‐HD that have helped establish the optimal outcome measures for tracking clinical trial results. Clinical trials of antisense oligonucleotide therapies to inhibit HTT messenger RNA are now underway, along with biomarker monitoring of mutant HTT to monitor target engagement and neurofilament light chain to measure neurodegeneration. , , Successful strategies used in HD can hopefully translate to the SCA field.

To recruit sufficient patients for clinical trials, setting up collaborations and patient registries is critical. Fortunately, SCA registries are already in place in the United States and Europe and efforts are ongoing for global initiatives. Multiple successful international research cohorts have been developed (Table 3). , , , , , For instance, In the United States, there is a large consortium for the SCAs called the Clinical Research Consortium for Spinocerebellar Ataxias (CRC‐SCA), while in Europe, the Ataxia Study Group has organized multiple international collaborative research projects including the European Integrated Project on Spinocerebellar Ataxia (EuroSCA) and the European Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3/Machado‐Joseph Disease Initiative (ESMI). Looking forward, there are on‐going global initiatives like SCA Global, which aims to accelerate biomarker discovery and treatment development via standardization of research procedures and expansion of research efforts around the world.

Table 3

Summary of international SCA research cohorts.

Research consortium	Genetic ataxia	Biomarker sample type	Imaging studies	Target sample size	Participating countries and funding sources	Time period
Clinical Research Consortium for Spinocerebellar Ataxias (CRC‐SCA) 97	SCA1	Blood	MRI/MRS at 4 sites	800	Country: USA	2010‐present
	SCA2				Funding: National Ataxia Foundation; National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) of the National Institute of Health (NIH)
	SCA3
	SCA6
	SCA7
	SCA8
	SCA10
European Integrated Project on Spinocerebellar Ataxias (EUROSCA) 2 , 47	SCA1	Blood	MRI	1255	Countries: Germany, Spain, France, Italy, UK, Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Hungary	2005–2016
	SCA2	Urine			Funding: European Union Sixth Framework Programme FP‐6
	SCA3
	SCA6
European Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3/Machado‐Joseph Disease Initiative (ESMI) 136	SCA3	Blood	MRI	800	Countries: Germany, UK, Portugal, Netherlands	2016‐present
		CSF			Funding: EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND); German Ministry of Education and Research; Medical Research Council (MRC, United Kingdom); Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT; Portugal); Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Individuals at Risk for SCA (RISCA) 62	SCA1	Blood	MRI at 8 sites	480	Countries: France, Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Spain	2009‐present
	SCA2	Urine			Funding: European Research Area Network for Research Programmes on Rare Diseases, Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Italian Ministry of Health, European Community's Seventh Framework Programme
	SCA3
	SCA6
Clinical trial Readiness for SCA1 & SCA3 (READISCA) 97	Early‐stage SCA1 and SCA3	Blood	MRI/MRS at 6 sites in 3 countries	200	Countries: USA, Germany, France, UK, Poland, Hungary, Italy, Austria, Belgium, Portugal, Spain, Netherlands, Norway, Denmark, Serbia, Egypt, Morocco	2018‐present
					Funding: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) of the National Institute of Health (NIH); National Ataxia Foundation
SCA3 Biomarkers and Genetic modifiers in a Study pre‐ and post‐symptomatic carriers (BIGPRO) 137	SCA3	Blood	Not applicable	95	Countries: Brazil, Germany	2017–2020
					Funding: CAPES Foundation

For the SCAs, it is important that manifest patients as well as asymptomatic individuals at risk are recruited for both biomarker development and clinical trials. Recruited patients should have a confirmed diagnosis of a genetic ataxia based on standardized genetic testing. It is important that in global patient registries both genetic and phenotypic information be catalogued closely since trials of treatments aimed largely at symptomatic improvement would require that patient symptomatology be a major inclusion criteria and that those with minimal symptoms be excluded. On the other hand, trials aimed at assessing neuroprotective strategies could recruit patients with manifest disease but could also potentially assess pre‐manifest individuals with known SCA mutations to determine if progression to manifest disease can be halted.

Due to the constraints in patient recruitment, innovations in clinical design are likely to play a role especially for the rarer SCAs. One recourse is for experimental drugs to be compared to historical controls rather than a placebo arm, but this is not ideal given the role of placebo effects. Therefore, an alternative approach would be to test multiple drugs against a single placebo arm. , This arm would serve as a control for multiple interventions, thus reducing the number of patients necessary for recruitment. Such an approach may also be appealing to patients who may prefer the increased likelihood of being randomized to an experimental arm. Another approach that eliminates the need for a dedicated placebo cohort is a cross‐over design in which individuals could be placed on an experimental drug for a certain duration of time, then given time for the drug to wash out. The disease process can be observed in both conditions, with the process of cross‐over repeated (if necessary) to document whether the patient did in fact improve on the drug. ,

Trials could also be run to demonstrate non‐effectiveness rather than effectiveness. Such studies are similar to establishing non‐inferiority of experimental interventions in other diseases and require fewer patients. By paring down candidate therapies through an early rejection of candidates, fewer patients will be tied down in non‐productive trials and more patients will be available to participate in trials testing drugs that are found to be more likely to show efficacy after this initial screening process. Other statistical techniques include Bayesian methods where information from natural history studies could be borrowed to make prior distributions about expected endpoints and clinical outcomes.

Another challenge in clinical trial development that needs to be addressed is financial. Clinical research to be sure is expensive, and funds are especially hard to come by for rare disorders. Creative and collaborative approaches, therefore, need to be employed to raise support for these disorders from philanthropic sources, government agencies, and the pharmaceutical industry. Fortunately government regulatory agencies in the United States and Europe have set up mechanisms to help accelerate the development of drugs for rare disorders. In particular, in 1983, the Orphan Drug Act was passed in the United States with the help of advocacy groups such as the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD). This legislation helped promote and accelerate drug development for rare disorders by providing financial incentives such as tax credits and a period of market exclusivity, as well as the establishment of a grant support program. Such support is critical for helping to develop effective clinical trials for these rare disorders.

Conclusion

This review summarizes the major challenges to clinical trials in the SCAs. But we would like to end on an optimistic note. As outlined above, these challenges are being addressed by substantial technological advancements along several fronts, and new therapies are on the horizon.

Some of the biggest operational hurdles for clinical trials have already been accomplished. Collaborative consortia have been established and patients are being recruited in registries throughout North America and Europe. Natural history studies, rating scale optimization, and biomarker development are ongoing at an active pace. We are also gaining important information from clinical trials in other neurodegenerative diseases, most notably Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and perhaps most relevant, Huntington’s disease. For each of these diseases, researchers have had to work through similar steps of infrastructure development and clinical trial readiness, and we can therefore learn from the steps taken in these disorders. But perhaps most importantly, the anticipation of truly groundbreaking protein lowering strategies is creating opportunities for pharmaceutical companies to attempt to test novel treatments for the SCAs. This is providing the incentives to provide further funding for clinical trials in the years ahead. These are exciting times for SCA research with emerging optimism that treatments will soon be brought to bear on these otherwise incurable diseases.

Conflict of Interest

P. O. receives support from the NIH (1R01NS062051, 1R01NS082351, and R56NS108639). He has received funding from the following sources for clinical trials: Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, U01NS104326 (site PI), and the National Ataxia Foundation (CRC‐SCA natural history study). C.R.E received support from National Ataxia Foundation (YISCA award) and NUCATS & NMF (Dixon translational Research Grants Initiative award). S.H.K receives support from the NIH (1R01NS104434, 1R01NS118179, 1R03NS114871, and 1R13NS117005), and also receives funding support from Biohaven Pharmaceuticals and Sage Therapeutics for clinical trial research. S.M.B., S.M.A, and C.R.E. have no competing interests.

Funding Information

P. O. receives support from the NIH (1R01NS062051, 1R01NS082351, and R56NS108639). He has received funding from the following sources for clinical trials: Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, U01NS104326 (site PI), and the National Ataxia Foundation (CRC‐SCA natural history study). C.R.E received support from National Ataxia Foundation (YISCA award) and NUCATS & NMF (Dixon translational Research Grants Initiative award). S.H.K receives support from the NIH (1R01NS104434, 1R01NS118179, 1R03NS114871, and 1R13NS117005), and also receives funding support from Biohaven Pharmaceuticals and Sage Therapeutics for clinical trial research.