Ricardo Nassar1,2,3, Felipe Giron4,5,6, Andres M Garcia2, Lina M Rodríguez1,2, Alberto E Ricaurte1,3, Roberto J Rueda-Esteban2, Alejandro Pizano2, Juan D Hernandez1,2. 1. Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, 110111, Colombia. 2. School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá D.C., 111711, Colombia. 3. School of Medicine, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. 4. School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá D.C., 111711, Colombia. Felipegiron15@gmail.com. 5. School of Medicine, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. Felipegiron15@gmail.com. 6. , Bogotá D.C., Colombia. Felipegiron15@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease among patients with obesity, with an associated prevalence of 39 to 61% between the population who attends a bariatric surgery evaluation. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a popular and valid option for obesity treatment, even though the literature is ambivalent regarding the increase or decrease in GERD after this surgery. Thus, it is necessary to propose new surgical techniques as a solution to GERD in patients with a concomitant LSG or with a history of it. Therefore, we present a modified technique based on Hill's gastropexy described originally in 1967. OBJECTIVE: Describe and propose a surgical procedure for GERD management based on the Hill technique that can be applied in all patients who undergo an LSG or with a history of it. METHODS: Retrospective observational study with a prospective database in which we described, Hill modified technique in a group of 16 patients with GERD who underwent this procedure concomitantly with an LSG or who presented with GERD after LSG with a 3-year follow-up. The surgical technique is based on an intra-abdominal esophageal length of a minimum of 3 cm and posterior fixation of the gastroesophageal junction to the crus. RESULTS: Postoperative controls have shown satisfactory results in the control and management of GERD symptoms in this group of patients, with very few to no complications associated with the procedure and without reintervention or medication out of the standard protocol. CONCLUSION: Hill modified technique can be used and presented as an option for GERD control in patients with LSG.
BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease among patients with obesity, with an associated prevalence of 39 to 61% between the population who attends a bariatric surgery evaluation. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a popular and valid option for obesity treatment, even though the literature is ambivalent regarding the increase or decrease in GERD after this surgery. Thus, it is necessary to propose new surgical techniques as a solution to GERD in patients with a concomitant LSG or with a history of it. Therefore, we present a modified technique based on Hill's gastropexy described originally in 1967. OBJECTIVE: Describe and propose a surgical procedure for GERD management based on the Hill technique that can be applied in all patients who undergo an LSG or with a history of it. METHODS: Retrospective observational study with a prospective database in which we described, Hill modified technique in a group of 16 patients with GERD who underwent this procedure concomitantly with an LSG or who presented with GERD after LSG with a 3-year follow-up. The surgical technique is based on an intra-abdominal esophageal length of a minimum of 3 cm and posterior fixation of the gastroesophageal junction to the crus. RESULTS: Postoperative controls have shown satisfactory results in the control and management of GERD symptoms in this group of patients, with very few to no complications associated with the procedure and without reintervention or medication out of the standard protocol. CONCLUSION: Hill modified technique can be used and presented as an option for GERD control in patients with LSG.
Authors: Chao Zhang; Diangang Liu; Fei Li; David I Watson; Xiang Gao; Jan H Koetje; Tao Luo; Chao Yan; Xing Du; Zhonggao Wang Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 4.584