Literature DB >> 34018845

Interrater Reliability of NI-RADS on Posttreatment PET/Contrast-enhanced CT Scans in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Derek Hsu1, Tanya J Rath1, Barton F Branstetter1, Yoshimi Anzai1, C Douglas Phillips1, Amy F Juliano1, Kristine M Mosier1, Michael P Bazylewicz1, Stan M Poliashenko1, Matthew H Kulzer1, Patricia A Rhyner1, Benjamin Risk1, Richard H Wiggins1, Ashley H Aiken1.   

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the interrater reliability among radiologists examining posttreatment head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) fluorodeoxyglucose PET/contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) scans using Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, images in 80 patients with HNSCC who underwent posttreatment surveillance PET/CECT and immediate prior comparison CECT or PET/CECT (from June 2014 to July 2016) were uploaded to the American College of Radiology's cloud-based website, Cortex. Eight radiologists from seven institutions with variable NI-RADS experience independently evaluated each case and assigned an appropriate prose description and NI-RADS category for the primary site and the neck site. Five of these individuals were experienced readers (> 5 years of experience), and three were novices (< 5 years of experience). In total, 640 lexicon-based and NI-RADS categories were assigned to lesions among the 80 included patients by the eight radiologists. Light generalization of Cohen κ for interrater reliability was performed. Results Of the 80 included patients (mean age, 63 years ± 10 [standard deviation]), there were 58 men (73%); 60 patients had stage IV HNSCC (75%), and the most common tumor location was oropharynx (n = 32; 40%). Light κ for lexicon was 0.30 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.36) at the primary site and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.24, 0.37) at the neck site. Light κ for NI-RADS category was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.46, 0.63) at the primary site and 0.60 (95% CI: 0.48, 0.69) at the neck site. Percent agreement between lexicon and correlative NI-RADS category was 84.4% (540 of 640) at the primary site and 92.6% (593 of 640) at the neck site. There was no significant difference in interobserver agreement among the experienced versus novice raters. Conclusion Moderate agreement was achieved among eight radiologists using NI-RADS at posttreatment HNSCC surveillance imaging. Keywords: CT, PET/CT, Head/Neck, Neck, Neoplasms-Primary, Observer Performance Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT; Head/Neck; Neck; Neoplasms-Primary; Observer Performance; PET/CT

Year:  2021        PMID: 34018845     DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2021200131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer        ISSN: 2638-616X


  3 in total

1.  Adding MR Diffusion Imaging and T2 Signal Intensity to Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System Categories 2 and 3 in Primary Sites of Postsurgical Oral Cavity Carcinoma Provides Incremental Diagnostic Value.

Authors:  A Jajodia; G Mandal; V Yadav; J Khoda; J Goyal; S Pasricha; S Puri; A Dewan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.966

2.  Discordance Between Oncology Clinician-Perceived and Radiologist-Intended Meaning of the Postradiotherapy Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Freeform Report for Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Zachary Patel; Jennifer A Schroeder; Paul M Bunch; Joni K Evans; Cole R Steber; Adam G Johnson; Joshua C Farris; Ryan T Hughes
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 8.961

Review 3.  PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-V. Head and Neck and Neuro Oncology.

Authors:  Richard H Wiggins; John M Hoffman; Gabriel C Fine; Matthew F Covington; Ahmed Ebada Salem; Bhasker R Koppula; Kathryn A Morton
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.