Literature DB >> 34018044

Routine prefeed gastric aspiration in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jogender Kumar1, Jitendra Meena1, Piyush Mittal1, Jeeva Shankar2, Praveen Kumar3, Arvind Shenoi4.   

Abstract

Despite lack of evidence, the practice of routine prefeed gastric residue aspiration before the next feed is common. Recent studies suggest that this practice might be even harmful. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effect of avoiding routine prefeed gastric residue aspiration as compared to routine aspiration, on various clinical outcomes in preterm infants. We searched five different electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library) until March 8, 2021. Only randomized controlled trials comparing the practice of routine prefeed gastric aspiration with no routine aspiration in preterm infants were considered eligible. The random-effects meta-analysis was done using RevMan 5.3 software. Of the 894 unique records identified by our search, we included 6 studies (451 participants) in the review. There was no significant difference in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.31 to 2.08; 421 participants in 5 trials). Avoiding routine prefeed aspiration was associated with achieving full enteral feeds earlier (MD - 3.19 days, 95% CI - 4.22 to - 2.16), shorter duration of hospitalization (MD - 5.32 days; 95% CI - 10.25 to - 0.38), and lower incidence of late-onset sepsis (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99). Time to regain birth weight, days of total parenteral nutrition or central venous line usage, culture-positive sepsis, and all-cause mortality did not differ between the two groups.
Conclusion: In the absence of other signs of feed intolerance, routine prefeed gastric residue aspiration should be avoided in preterm infants.Prospero registration number: CRD42020197657 What is Known: • Though, routine prefeed aspiration before next feed is a common practice in preterm gavage-fed infants. • Recent study suggests that the omission of routine gastric residual evaluation led to improved weight gain and earlier hospital discharge. What is New: • Low- to moderate-quality evidence suggest that avoiding routine prefeed gastric residue monitoring helps in the reduction of late-onset sepsis, achieving full enteral feeds earlier, and earlier discharge from the hospital. • Abandoning the practice of routine prefeed aspiration in absence of other signs of feed intolerance in preterm low birthweight neonates is safe.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feed intolerance; Gastric aspirates; Low birthweight; Necrotizing enterocolitis; Nutrition

Year:  2021        PMID: 34018044     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04122-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  17 in total

1.  Gastric residuals and their relationship to necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Bridget Arnold Cobb; Waldemar A Carlo; Namasivayam Ambalavanan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Routine monitoring of gastric residual for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants.

Authors:  Thangaraj Abiramalatha; Sivam Thanigainathan; Binu Ninan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 3.  Gastric residual evaluation in preterm neonates: a useful monitoring technique or a hindrance?

Authors:  Yue-Feng Li; Hung-Chih Lin; Roberto Murgas Torrazza; Leslie Parker; Elizabeth Talaga; Josef Neu
Journal:  Pediatr Neonatol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Abdominal circumference or gastric residual volume as measure of feed intolerance in VLBW infants.

Authors:  Avneet Kaur; Neelam Kler; Satish Saluja; Manoj Modi; Arun Soni; Anup Thakur; Pankaj Garg
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.839

5.  Evaluation of potential factors predicting attainment of full gavage feedings in preterm infants.

Authors:  Robert J Shulman; Ching-Nan Ou; E O'Brian Smith
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Gastric residual volume measurement in British neonatal intensive care units: a survey of practice.

Authors:  Jon Dorling; Lyvonne Tume; Barbara Arch; Kerry Woolfall; Lynne Latten; Louise Roper; Elizabeth Deja; Nazima Pathan; Helen Eccleson; Helen Hickey; Michaela Brown; Anne Beissel; Izabela Andrzejewska; Frederic Valla; Chris Gale
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2020-08-07

7.  Effect of Aspiration and Evaluation of Gastric Residuals on Intestinal Inflammation, Bleeding, and Gastrointestinal Peptide Level.

Authors:  Leslie A Parker; Michael Weaver; Roberto J Murgas Torrazza; Jonathon Shuster; Nan Li; Charlene Krueger; Josef Neu
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Necrotizing enterocolitis: risk factor analysis and role of gastric residuals in very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Enrico Bertino; Francesca Giuliani; Giovanna Prandi; Alessandra Coscia; Claudio Martano; Claudio Fabris
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.839

9.  Effect of Gastric Residual Evaluation on Enteral Intake in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Leslie A Parker; Michael Weaver; Roberto J Murgas Torrazza; Jonathon Shuster; Nan Li; Charlene Krueger; Josef Neu
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 10.  Guidelines for feeding very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Sourabh Dutta; Balpreet Singh; Lorraine Chessell; Jennifer Wilson; Marianne Janes; Kimberley McDonald; Shaneela Shahid; Victoria A Gardner; Aune Hjartarson; Margaret Purcha; Jennifer Watson; Chris de Boer; Barbara Gaal; Christoph Fusch
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 5.717

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of selective gastric residual monitoring on enteral intake in preterm infants.

Authors:  Serena Elia; Martina Ciarcià; Francesca Miselli; Giovanna Bertini; Carlo Dani
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.638

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.